A novel strategy to obtain quantitative data for modelling: combined enrichment and real-time PCR for enumeration of salmonellae from pig carcasses.

Salmonella is a major zoonotic pathogen which causes outbreaks and sporadic cases of gastroenteritis in humans worldwide. The primary sources for Salmonella are food-producing animals such as pigs and poultry. For risk assessment and hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) concepts, it is essential to produce large amounts of quantitative data, which is currently not achievable with the standard cultural based methods for enumeration of Salmonella. This study presents the development of a novel strategy to enumerate low numbers of Salmonella in cork borer samples taken from pig carcasses as a first concept and proof of principle for a new sensitive and rapid quantification method based on combined enrichment and real-time PCR. The novelty of the approach is in the short pre-enrichment step, where for most bacteria, growth is in the log phase. The method consists of an 8h pre-enrichment of the cork borer sample diluted 1:10 in non-selective buffered peptone water, followed by DNA extraction, and Salmonella detection and quantification by real-time PCR. The limit of quantification was 1.4 colony forming units (CFU)/20 cm(2) (approximately 10 g) of artificially contaminated sample with 95% confidence interval of ± 0.7 log CFU/sample. The precision was similar to the standard reference most probable number (MPN) method. A screening of 200 potentially naturally contaminated cork borer samples obtained over seven weeks in a slaughterhouse resulted in 25 Salmonella-positive samples. The analysis of salmonellae within these samples showed that the PCR method had a higher sensitivity for samples with a low contamination level (<6.7 CFU/sample), where 15 of the samples negative with the MPN method was detected with the PCR method and 5 were found to be negative by both methods. For the samples with a higher contamination level (6.7-310 CFU/sample) a good agreement between the results obtained with the PCR and MPN methods was obtained. The quantitative real-time PCR method can easily be applied to other food and environmental matrices by adaptation of the pre-enrichment time and media.

[1]  A. Lurette,et al.  Modelling Salmonella spread within a farrow-to-finish pig herd. , 2008, Veterinary research.

[2]  R. Knutsson,et al.  Rapid Quantification of Yersinia enterocolitica in Pork Samples by a Novel Sample Preparation Method, Flotation, Prior to Real-Time PCR , 2004, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  H. Korkeala,et al.  Factors related to the prevalence of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica on pig farms , 2011, Epidemiology and Infection.

[4]  A. Vidal,et al.  Salmonella enterica Infections in Spanish Swine Fattening Units , 2007, Zoonoses and public health.

[5]  D. Mossel,et al.  Impact on human health of Salmonella spp. on pork in The Netherlands and the anticipated effects of some currently proposed control strategies. , 1998, International journal of food microbiology.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[7]  Garrett Fitzmaurice,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement. , 2002, Nutrition.

[8]  Harry Philippeaux.  Emerging water borne pathogens , 1998 .

[9]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[10]  T. Oscar.  Simulation model for enumeration of Salmonella on chicken as a function of PCR detection time score and sample size: implications for risk assessment. , 2004, Journal of food protection.

[11]  Tine Hald,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Quantify the Contribution of Animal‐Food Sources to Human Salmonellosis , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[13]  J. Hoorfar,et al.  Optimization of a 12-Hour TaqMan PCR-Based Method for Detection of Salmonella Bacteria in Meat , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  W. Garthright.  Bias in the Logarithm of Microbial Density Estimates from Serial Dilutions , 1993 .

[15]  H. Korkeala,et al.  Variation in the prevalence of enteropathogenic Yersinia in slaughter pigs from Belgium, Italy, and Spain. , 2011, Foodborne pathogens and disease.

[16]  E. Reynisson,et al.  Evaluation of probe chemistries and platforms to improve the detection limit of real-time PCR. , 2006, Journal of microbiological methods.

[17]  B. Malorny,et al.  Evaluation of molecular typing methods for Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 isolated in Germany from healthy pigs. , 2001, Veterinary research.

[18]  K. Schneider,et al.  Detection of salmonella by flow-through immunocapture real-time PCR in selected foods within 8 hours. , 2007, Journal of food protection.

[19]  H. Argüello,et al.  Prevalence and serovars of Salmonella enterica on pig carcasses, slaughtered pigs and the environment of four Spanish slaughterhouses , 2012 .

[20]  E. Frost,et al.  Presence of Yersinia enterocolitica in tissues of orally-inoculated pigs and the tonsils and feces of pigs at slaughter. , 1999, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[21]  Peter Rådström,et al.  Culture-independent quantification of Salmonella enterica in carcass gauze swabs by flotation prior to real-time PCR. , 2011, International journal of food microbiology.

[22]  H. Stege,et al.  Herd-level risk factors for subclinical Salmonella infection in European finishing-pig herds. , 2004, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[23]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Simultaneous quantification of pathogenic Campylobacter and Salmonella in chicken rinse fluid by a flotation and real-time multiplex PCR procedure. , 2007, International journal of food microbiology.

[24]  L. Alban,et al.  Dynamics of Salmonella transmission on a British pig grower-finisher farm: a stochastic model , 2007, Epidemiology and Infection.

[25]  K Grijspeerdt,et al.  Salmonella on pig carcasses: positive pigs and cross contamination in the slaughterhouse , 2003, Journal of applied microbiology.

[26]  H. Fujikawa,et al.  Novel method for estimating viable Salmonella cell counts using real-time PCR. , 2006, Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi. Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan.

[27]  D. Werber,et al.  Epidemiology of reported Yersinia enterocolitica infections in Germany, 2001-2008 , 2010, BMC Public Health.

[28]  H. Marks,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative risk assessment , 1999 .

[29]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[30]  K. Seo,et al.  Detection and enumeration of Salmonella enteritidis in homemade ice cream associated with an outbreak: comparison of conventional and real-time PCR methods. , 2006, Journal of food protection.

[31]  E. Frost,et al.  Development of an ELISA procedure to detect swine carriers of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. , 2001, Veterinary microbiology.

[32]  R. Guy,et al.  A rapid molecular-based assay for direct quantification of viable bacteria in slaughterhouses. , 2006, Journal of food protection.

[33]  Truls Nesbakken,et al.  Occurrence of Yersinia enterocolitica and Campylobacter spp. in slaughter pigs and consequences for meat inspection, slaughtering, and dressing procedures. , 2003, International journal of food microbiology.

[34]  H. Korkeala,et al.  Transmission of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in the Pork Production Chain from Farm to Slaughterhouse , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[35]  P. Desmarchelier,et al.  Quantification and prevalence of Salmonella in beef cattle presenting at slaughter , 2004, Journal of applied microbiology.

[36]  S. Quessy,et al.  Epidemiological study of Yersinia enterocolitica in swine herds in Québec. , 2000, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[37]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Direct Quantitation and Detection of Salmonellae in Biological Samples without Enrichment, Using Two-Step Filtration and Real-Time PCR , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[38]  G. Salvat,et al.  CONVENIENT METHOD FOR RAPID AND QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF SALMONELLA ENTERICA CONTAMINATION: THE MINI‐MSRV MPN TECHNIQUE , 2003 .

[39]  B. Markey,et al.  Quantitative examination of Salmonella spp. in the lairage environment of a pig abattoir. , 2007, Foodborne pathogens and disease.

[40]  B. Cooper,et al.  Salmonella in slaughter pigs in Northern Ireland: prevalence and use of statistical modelling to investigate sample and abattoir effects. , 2007, International journal of food microbiology.

[41]  E. Skjerve,et al.  Control of Yersinia enterocolitica in pigs at herd level. , 1998, International journal of food microbiology.

[42]  J. Hartung,et al.  Validation of a method for the detection of virulent Yersinia enterocolitica and their distribution in slaughter pigs from conventional and alternative housing systems. , 2006, Veterinary microbiology.

[43]  Burkhard Malorny,et al.  Enumeration of Salmonella Bacteria in Food and Feed Samples by Real-Time PCR for Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[44]  B A Kenner,et al.  Detection and enumeration of salmonella and pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 1974, Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation.

[45]  Reiner Helmuth,et al.  Diagnostic Real-Time PCR for Detection of Salmonella in Food , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[46]  H. Korkeala,et al.  Contamination of carcasses with human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica 4/O:3 originates from pigs infected on farms. , 2009, Foodborne pathogens and disease.

[47]  A. Wingstrand,et al.  Time course of the serological response to Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 in experimentally infected pigs. , 1996, Veterinary microbiology.