Can Multiple-Choice Testing Induce Desirable Difficulties? Evidence from the Laboratory and the Classroom.

The term desirable difficulties (Bjork, 1994) refers to conditions of learning that, though often appearing to cause difficulties for the learner and to slow down the process of acquisition, actually improve long-term retention and transfer. One known desirable difficulty is testing (as compared with restudy), although typically it is tests that clearly involve retrieval--such as free and cued recall tests--that are thought to induce these learning benefits and not multiple-choice tests. Nonetheless, multiple-choice testing is ubiquitous in educational settings and many other high-stakes situations. In this article, we discuss research, in both the laboratory and the classroom, exploring whether multiple-choice testing can also be fashioned to promote the type of retrieval processes known to improve learning, and we speculate about the necessary properties that multiple-choice questions must possess, as well as the metacognitive strategy students need to use in answering such questions, to achieve this goal.

[1]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Altering memory representations through retrieval. , 1985 .

[3]  R. Bjork,et al.  Testing facilitates the regulation of subsequent study time , 2014 .

[4]  E. Bjork,et al.  Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning , 2014, Memory & Cognition.

[5]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Quizzing in Middle-School Science: Successful Transfer Performance on Classroom Exams , 2013 .

[6]  R. Bjork,et al.  Learning Versus Performance , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[7]  John A. Glover,et al.  The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. , 1989 .

[8]  D. Schacter,et al.  Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Test-enhanced learning in the classroom: long-term improvements from quizzing. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[10]  Kathleen B. McDermott,et al.  Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  H. Pashler,et al.  The influence of retrieval on retention , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Elizabeth Ligon Bjork,et al.  Multiple-choice testing as a desirable difficulty in the classroom , 2014 .

[13]  Nate Kornell,et al.  The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning? , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[14]  Katherine A Rawson,et al.  Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  K. Szpunar,et al.  Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Elizabeth Ligon Bjork,et al.  Pretesting with Multiple-choice Questions Facilitates Learning , 2011, CogSci.

[17]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Elizabeth Ligon Bjork,et al.  Misinformation : A Negative Consequence of Multiple-choice Testing , 2012 .

[19]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Learning Versus Performance , 2013, Perspectives on Psychological Science.

[20]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning in a Middle School Science Classroom: The Effects of Quiz Frequency and Placement. , 2011 .

[21]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  The interim test effect: Testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.