Three-dimensional numerical analysis of the stress transfer mechanism of XCC piled raft foundation

Abstract An X-section cast-in-place concrete (XCC) piled raft is a new type of foundation that uses piles with X-shaped cross-sections. Compared to a traditional circular cast-in-place concrete (CCC) pile, an XCC pile of the same cross-sectional area has a larger side resistance due to its larger cross-sectional perimeter. Although the pile capacity and load transfer mechanism of the XCC piled raft have been studied, the influence of this X-shaped geometry on the stress transfer between pile and surrounding soil is still not fully understood. To investigate the effects of the cross-sectional geometry, three-dimensional numerical analyses are conducted on an XCC and a traditional CCC piled rafts using the finite element method. The numerical results are verified by a field test of an XCC piled raft. Computed results reveal that lateral soil arching develops to a distance of approximately twice pile diameter surrounding the XCC pile, which can be demonstrated by the rotation of the principal stresses, leading to a non-uniform effective normal stress across a given cross-section and along the pile depth. The magnitude of the unit side resistance that acts on the concave surfaces of the XCC pile is up to twice the magnitude of the unit side resistance that acts on the flat surfaces. For a given applied load, the total side resistance mobilised on the XCC pile is usually larger than the total side resistance of the CCC pile, by a factor that ranges from 0.5 to 10, depending on the pile depth. Therefore, approximately 66% and 46% of the applied load is carried by the XCC and CCC piles respectively, and simultaneously, approximately 45% and 24% of the applied load is taken by the side resistance of the XCC and CCC piles, respectively. The larger effect of the XCC piled raft contributes to the cross-sectional geometry, which results in a larger perimeter and arching effects.

[1]  Michael W. O'Neill,et al.  Side resistance in piles and drilled shafts , 2001 .

[2]  Luca de Sanctis,et al.  Bearing Capacity of Piled Rafts on Soft Clay Soils , 2006 .

[3]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Influence of Laterally Loaded Sleeved Piles and Pile Groups on Slope Stability , 2001 .

[4]  Mahmoud Ghazavi,et al.  Analysis of kinematic seismic response of tapered piles , 2007 .

[5]  Harry G. Poulos,et al.  Piled raft foundations: design and applications , 2001 .

[6]  E I Robinsky,et al.  Sand Displacement and Compaction around Model Friction Piles , 1964 .

[7]  William G. Davids,et al.  Field-Measured Response of an Integral Abutment Bridge with Short Steel H-Piles , 2010 .

[8]  Mark Randolph,et al.  An approximate analysis procedure for piled raft foundations , 1993 .

[9]  K. Harrop‐Williams.  ARCH IN SOIL ARCHING , 1989 .

[10]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of Performance of Laterally Loaded Sleeved Piles in Sloping Ground , 2001 .

[11]  C. P. Wroth,et al.  Application of the failure state in undrained simple shear to the shaft capacity of driven piles , 1981 .

[12]  R. Handy.  The Arch in Soil Arching , 1985 .

[13]  Michael W. O'Neill.  Side Resistance in Piles and Drilled Shafts (The Thirty-Fourth Karl Terzaghi Lecture) , 2001 .

[14]  Widjojo A. Prakoso,et al.  Contribution to Piled Raft Foundation Design , 2001 .

[15]  E I Robinsky,et al.  Effect of Shape and Volume on the Capacity of Model Piles in Sand , 1964 .

[16]  Yaru Lv,et al.  Field Tests on Bearing Characteristics of X-Section Pile Composite Foundation , 2012 .

[17]  Jie Han,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Geosynthetic-Reinforced and Pile-Supported Earth Platforms over Soft Soil , 2002 .

[18]  Y. C. Kog,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF PILE SUBJECT TO NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION AND AXIAL LOAD , 2004 .

[19]  C. Juang,et al.  Geotechnical Special Publication , 2014 .

[20]  Y. K. Chow,et al.  Analysis of Piled Raft Foundations Using a Variational Approach , 2001 .

[21]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Side Resistance of Large Diameter Bored Piles Socketed into Decomposed Rocks , 2001 .

[22]  Pastsakorn Kitiyodom,et al.  Case study of a piled raft foundation constructed using a reverse construction method and its post-analysis , 2009 .

[23]  Rodrigo Salgado,et al.  Estimation of Load Capacity of Pipe Piles in Sand Based on Cone Penetration Test Results , 2003 .

[24]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Centrifuge and numerical modeling of axial load effects on piles in consolidating ground , 2009 .

[25]  Rw Cooke,et al.  SOME OBSERVATIONS OF THE FOUNDATION LOADING AND SETTLEMENT OF A MULTI-STOREY BUILDING ON A PILED RAFT FOUNDATION IN LONDON CLAY. DISCUSSION. , 1981 .

[26]  Yaru Lv,et al.  In-situ Tests on Cast-in-place Concrete X-section Pile for Bearing Capacity of Single-pile Composite Foundation , 2011 .

[27]  Nagaratnam Sivakugan,et al.  Can Soil Arching Be Insensitive to ϕ , 2010 .

[28]  C. F. Leung,et al.  Negative skin friction on end-bearing piles , 2006 .

[29]  Fa-Yun Liang,et al.  A modified variational approach for the analysis of piled raft foundation , 2004 .