Reduction of gait data variability using curve registration.

Timing in peak gait values shifts slightly between gait trials. When averaged, the standard deviation (S.D.) in gait data may increase due to this inter-trial variability unless normalization is carried out beforehand. The objective of this study was to determine how curve registration, an alignment technique, can reduce inter-subject variability in gait data without perturbing the curve characteristics. Twenty young, healthy men participated in this study each providing a single gait trial. Gait was assessed by means of a four-camera high-speed video system synchronized to a force plate. A rigid body three-segment model was used in an inverse dynamic approach to calculate three-dimensional muscle powers at the hip, knee and ankle. Curve registration was applied to each of the 20 gait trials to align the peak powers. The mean registered peak powers increased by an average of 0.10 +/- 0.13 W/kg with the highest increases in the sagittal plane at push-off. After performing curve registration, the RMS values decreased by 13.6% and the greatest reduction occurred at the hip and knee, both in the sagittal plane. No important discontinuities were reported in the first and second derivatives of the unregistered and registered curves. Curve registration did not have much effect on the harmonic content. This would be an appropriate technique for application prior to any statistical analysis using able-bodied gait patterns.

[1]  V. Vardaxis,et al.  Classification of able-bodied gait using 3-D muscle powers , 1998 .

[2]  B Landjerit,et al.  Bilateral gait patterns in subjects fitted with a total hip prosthesis. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  S. Olney,et al.  Multivariate examination of data from gait analysis of persons with stroke. , 1998, Physical therapy.

[4]  R. Aissaoui,et al.  Simultaneous bilateral 3-D able-bodied gait , 1996 .

[5]  W. Congress Purkn,et al.  The influence of walking speed on mechanical joint power during gait , 1997 .

[6]  Heydar Sadeghi,et al.  Functional gait asymmetry in , 1997 .

[7]  B. Silverman,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 1997 .

[8]  D. Kendall MORPHOMETRIC TOOLS FOR LANDMARK DATA: GEOMETRY AND BIOLOGY , 1994 .

[9]  D. Winter,et al.  Kinetic analysis of the lower limbs during walking: what information can be gained from a three-dimensional model? , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J. F. Yang,et al.  Electromyographic amplitude normalization methods: improving their sensitivity as diagnostic tools in gait analysis. , 1984, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  S. Olney,et al.  Work and power in gait of stroke patients. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  A E Patla,et al.  Altered kinetic strategy for the control of swing limb elevation over obstacles in unilateral below-knee amputee gait. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  A. Hof Scaling gait data to body size , 1996 .

[14]  B J McFadyen,et al.  Comparison of gait between young adults fitted with the space foot and nondisabled persons. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  T. Gasser,et al.  Statistical Tools to Analyze Data Representing a Sample of Curves , 1992 .

[16]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Normalization of temporal-distance parameters in pediatric gait. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  P. Allard,et al.  Gait pattern classification of healthy elderly men based on biomechanical data. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  T. Gasser,et al.  Alignment of curves by dynamic time warping , 1997 .