Using channelized Hotelling observers to quantify temporal effects of medical liquid crystal displays on detection performance

Clinical practice is rapidly moving in the direction of volumetric imaging. Often, radiologists interpret these images in liquid crystal displays at browsing rates of 30 frames per second or higher. However, recent studies suggest that the slow response of the display can compromise image quality. In order to quantify the temporal effect of medical displays on detection performance, we investigate two designs of a multi-slice channelized Hotelling observer (msCHO) model in the task of detecting a single-slice signal in multi-slice simulated images. The design of msCHO models is inspired by simplifying assumptions about how humans observe while viewing in the stack-browsing mode. For comparison, we consider a standard CHO applied only on the slice where the signal is located, recently used in a similar study. We refer to it as a single-slice CHO (ssCHO). Overall, our results confirm previous findings that the slow response of displays degrades the detection performance of the observers. More specifically, the observed performance range of msCHO designs is higher compared to the ssCHO suggesting that the extent and rate of degradation, though significant, may be less drastic than previously estimated by the ssCHO. Especially, the difference between msCHO and ssCHO is more significant for higher browsing speeds than for slow image sequences or static images. This, together with their design criteria driven by the assumptions about humans, makes the msCHO models promising candidates for further studies aimed at building anthropomorphic observer models for the stack-mode image presentation.

[1]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Temporal response of medical liquid crystal displays. , 2007, Medical physics.

[2]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Incorporating Human Contrast Sensitivity in Model Observers for Detection Tasks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Ewout Vansteenkiste,et al.  Channelized Hotelling observers for the assessment of volumetric imaging data sets. , 2011, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  C Abbey,et al.  Statistical texture synthesis of mammographic images with super-blob lumpy backgrounds. , 1999, Optics express.

[5]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[6]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Image browsing in slow medical liquid crystal displays. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[7]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Foundations of Image Science , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[10]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Using the Hotelling observer on multi-slice and multi-view simulated SPECT myocardial images , 2001 .

[11]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Megalopinakophobia: its symptoms and cures , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  P.H. Pretorius,et al.  Single-slice versus multi-slice display for human-observer lesion-detection studies , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[13]  Brandon D Gallas,et al.  One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[14]  Ljiljana Platisa,et al.  Channelized hotelling observers for the detection of 2D signals in 3D simulated images , 2009, 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).