A field experiment was conducted to test the self-perception explanation of the "foot-in-the-door" phenomenon of increased compliance with a substantial request after prior compliance with a smaller demand. In this study, some subjects were first approached with a small request (answer 8 questions in a telephone survey) the size of which was virtually certain to guarantee compliance. Other subjects were first approached with a request sufficiently large to guarantee noncompliance (answer 50 questions). Subjects in both of these conditions were subsequently approached with a moderately sized request (30 questions sponsored by a different public service organization). As predicted by self-perception theory, subjects in the small-initial-request condition showed a higher rate of compliance to the second request (.519), whereas subjects in the large-initial-request condition showed a lower rate of compliance (.219) than subjects in the no-initial-request control condition (.333).
[1]
H. Kelley.
The processes of causal attribution.
,
1973
.
[2]
Koch Sigmund Ed,et al.
Psychology: A Study of A Science
,
1962
.
[3]
Seymour W. Uranowitz.
Helping and self-attributions: A field experiment.
,
1975
.
[4]
Jacob Beck,et al.
Adaptation-level theory.
,
1974
.
[5]
H. Helson,et al.
Adaptation-level theory
,
1964
.
[6]
J. Freedman,et al.
Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique.
,
1966,
Journal of personality and social psychology.
[7]
D. Bem.
Self-Perception Theory
,
1972
.
[8]
Elliot Aronson,et al.
Effect of the severity of threat on the devaluation of forbidden behavior.
,
1963
.
[9]
M. Lepper.
Dissonance, self-perception, and honesty in children.
,
1973,
Journal of personality and social psychology.