A low-complexity soft output detection algorithm for spatial modulation systems

Spatial modulation (SM) is a promising multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) transmission technology, which exploits the indices of transmit antennas to encode information into the spatial dimension and needs less radio frequency chains. To detect the transmitted information, the maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm is often adopted which has high computational complexity. Some low-complexity detection algorithms only consider hard-decision cases with no channel coding. In this paper, a low-complexity soft output detection algorithm is proposed for coded spatial modulation systems. Its computational complexity doesn't increase with the modulation order and hence much lower than the soft output ML detection algorithm. Simulation results demonstrate that the bit error rate (BER) performance is near to the ML detection with obvious complexity reduction. By sorting the detection metrics and selecting less transmit antenna indices as search candidates to compute soft bit information, further reduction of computational complexity could be obtained.

[1]  Gerard J. Foschini,et al.  Layered space-time architecture for wireless communication in a fading environment when using multi-element antennas , 1996, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[2]  Yue Xiao,et al.  A New Low-Complexity Near-ML Detection Algorithm for Spatial Modulation , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[3]  Ali Ghrayeb,et al.  Spatial modulation: optimal detection and performance analysis , 2008, IEEE Communications Letters.

[4]  Harald Haas,et al.  Generalised Sphere Decoding for Spatial Modulation , 2013, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[5]  Yue Xiao,et al.  A Low-Complexity Detection Scheme for Differential Spatial Modulation , 2015, IEEE Communications Letters.

[6]  Harald Haas,et al.  Sphere Decoding for Spatial Modulation , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[7]  Harald Haas,et al.  Reduced Complexity Sphere Decoder for Spatial Modulation Detection Receivers , 2010, 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010.

[8]  Jinlong Wang,et al.  Low-Complexity ML Detection for Spatial Modulation MIMO With APSK Constellation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[9]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  Spatial Modulation for Generalized MIMO: Challenges, Opportunities, and Implementation , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  Jong-Soo Seo,et al.  Soft-output ML detector for spatial modulation OFDM systems , 2009, IEICE Electron. Express.

[11]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  Reduced-Complexity ML Detection and Capacity-Optimized Training for Spatial Modulation Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[12]  Harald Haas,et al.  Spatial Modulation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[13]  Siavash M. Alamouti,et al.  A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications , 1998, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[14]  P. Grant,et al.  Spatial modulation for multiple-antenna wireless systems: a survey , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[15]  Chang Wook Ahn,et al.  Spatial Modulation - A New Low Complexity Spectral Efficiency Enhancing Technique , 2006, 2006 First International Conference on Communications and Networking in China.

[16]  Minglu Jin,et al.  A Low-Complexity ML Detection Algorithm for Spatial Modulation Systems With $M$PSK Constellation , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.