Real-time estimation of break sizes during LOCA in nuclear power plants using NARX neural network
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Enrico Zio,et al. Identification of a line break by a neural network methodology , 1994 .
[2] Mohammad B. Ghofrani,et al. Accident management support tools in nuclear power plants: A post-Fukushima review , 2016 .
[3] Man Gyun Na,et al. Detection and Diagnostics of Loss of Coolant Accidents Using Support Vector Machines , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[4] Poong Hyun Seong,et al. A dynamic neural network based accident diagnosis advisory system for nuclear power plants , 2005 .
[5] Enrico Zio,et al. Remaining useful life prediction of degrading systems subjected to imperfect maintenance: Application to draught fans , 2018 .
[6] Man Gyun Na,et al. Prediction of Leak Flow Rate Using Fuzzy Neural Networks in Severe Post-LOCA Circumstances , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[7] César Queral,et al. Current Status and Applications of Integrated Safety Assessment and Simulation Code System for ISA , 2017 .
[8] Man Gyun Na,et al. ESTIMATION OF BREAK LOCATION AND SIZE FOR LOSS OF COOLANT ACCIDENTS USING NEURAL NETWORKS , 2004 .
[9] M. Saghafi,et al. Determination of PAR configuration for PWR containment design: A hydrogen mitigation strategy , 2017 .
[10] Caro Lucas,et al. Identification of a nuclear reactor core (VVER) using recurrent neural networks , 2002 .
[11] T. Takeda. ROSA/LSTF test and RELAP5 code analyses on PWR 1% vessel upper head small-break LOCA with accident management measure based on core exit temperature , 2018, Nuclear Engineering and Technology.
[12] Francesco Saverio D'Auria,et al. Application of FFTBM with signal mirroring to improve accuracy assessment of MELCOR code , 2016 .
[13] Tsungnan Lin,et al. What to remember: how memory order affects the performance of NARX neural networks , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98CH36227).
[14] A. Srivastava,et al. Diagnostic system for identification of accident scenarios in nuclear power plants using artificial neural networks , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..
[15] Davide Roverso,et al. Plant diagnostics by transient classification: The ALADDIN approach , 2002, Int. J. Intell. Syst..
[16] Man Gyun Na,et al. Diagnostics of Loss of Coolant Accidents Using SVC and GMDH Models , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[17] Takeshi Takeda,et al. Uncertainty analysis of ROSA/LSTF test by RELAP5 code and PKL counterpart test concerning PWR hot leg break LOCAs , 2018, Nuclear Engineering and Technology.
[18] Man Gyun Na,et al. Smart Sensing of the RPV Water Level in NPP Severe Accidents Using a GMDH Algorithm , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[19] Sung Won Bae,et al. ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION METHOD BY COMPARING MONTE-CARLO METHOD AND WILKS’ FORMULA , 2014 .
[20] Poong Hyun Seong,et al. A dynamic neural network aggregation model for transient diagnosis in nuclear power plants , 2007 .
[21] Enrico Zio,et al. Clustering for unsupervised fault diagnosis in nuclear turbine shut-down transients , 2015 .
[22] Peter Tiño,et al. Learning long-term dependencies in NARX recurrent neural networks , 1996, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.
[23] Alessandro Petruzzi,et al. Thirty Years’ Experience in RELAP5 Applications at GRNSPG & NINE , 2016 .
[24] Francesco Saverio D'Auria,et al. Development and qualification of a thermal-hydraulic nodalization for modeling station blackout accident in PSB-VVER test facility , 2016 .