Memory for mental models of spatial descriptions: An episodic-construction-trace hypothesis

Three experiments, based on Mani and Johnson-Laird’s (1982) study, tested memory for spatial descriptions. In Phase 1 of each experiment, subjects judged whether diagrams matched verbal descriptions that were either determinate or indeterminate. In Phase 2, subjects attempted to recognize the descriptions studied in Phase 1. Mani and Johnson-Laird reported a crossover: Gist memory was better for determinate descriptions and verbatim memory was better for indeterminate descriptions. This crossover suggests that mental models are remembered. All three new experiments failed to replicate the crossover, challenging whether models are preservedin episodic memory. It was hypothesized instead that episodic memory records the mental operations by which models are constructed. This hypothesis accounted for the findings of all three experiments. In Experiments 1 and 2, performance varied with the construction-trace overlap between-recognition test descriptions. In Experiment 3, performance was depressed if the order of sentences within descriptions was altered between study and test.

[1]  S. Morra Developmental differences in the use of verbatim versus spatial representations in the recall of spatial descriptions: A probabilistic model and an experimental analysis , 1989 .

[2]  S. Greenspan,et al.  Updating situation models during narrative comprehension , 1989 .

[3]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension , 1987 .

[4]  J. Bransford,et al.  Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach ☆ ☆☆ , 1972 .

[5]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Spatial Descriptions and Referential Continuity , 1982 .

[6]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[7]  B. Tversky,et al.  Switching points of view in spatial mental models , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Z. Pylyshyn Robot's Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence , 1987 .

[9]  John R. Anderson Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. , 1978 .

[10]  B. Tversky,et al.  Searching imagined environments. , 1990 .

[11]  S. Kosslyn Image and mind , 1982 .

[12]  S. Greenspan,et al.  Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension , 1987 .

[13]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Validating computational models: A critique of Anderson's indeterminacy of representation claim. , 1979 .

[14]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[15]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  What the Mind’s Eye Tells the Mind’s Brain: A Critique of Mental Imagery , 1973 .

[16]  John R. Anderson The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[17]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  The mental representation of spatial descriptions , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[18]  P. A. Kolers,et al.  Procedures of mind. , 1984 .

[19]  Michel Denis,et al.  Scanning visual images generated from verbal descriptions , 1989 .

[20]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[21]  John D. Bransford,et al.  The abstraction of linguistic ideas , 1971 .

[22]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[23]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models☆ , 1992 .