An International Comparison of Achievement Inequality in Within- and Between-School Tracking Systems

Secondary school tracking is organized in some countries on a course-by-course basis within schools and in other countries as explicit academic and vocational streaming, often in separate school buildings. This article is the first to compare these two forms of tracking, using student-level tracking data across the United States and 19 other developed countries. Results indicate that course-by-course tracking is less segregated by socioeconomic status (SES) than is academic/vocational streaming. Yet both forms of tracking have comparable achievement gaps between tracks. Among students in the same track, SES disparities in achievement are larger in course-by-course tracking than in academic/vocational streaming.

[1]  正弘 中舘 OECD (経済開発協力機構) : Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development , 1991 .

[2]  Adam Gamoran,et al.  Tracking and Inequality: New Directions for Research and Practice , 2009 .

[3]  Vincent Dupriez,et al.  How Do School Systems Manage Pupils’ Heterogeneity? , 2008, Comparative Education Review.

[4]  Robert D. Mare,et al.  Social Background and School Continuation Decisions , 1980 .

[5]  Guillermo Montt Cross-national Differences in Educational Achievement Inequality , 2011 .

[6]  J. Willms School Composition and Contextual Effects on Student Outcomes , 2010, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[7]  Claudia Buchmann,et al.  Stratification and the formation of expectations in highly differentiated educational systems , 2009 .

[8]  S. Kelly Do increased levels of parental involvement account for social class differences in track placement , 2004 .

[9]  William H. Schmidt,et al.  Facing the Consequences: Using TIMSS for a Closer Look at U.S. Mathematics and Science Education , 1999 .

[10]  Robert Crosnoe,et al.  Low-Income Students and the Socioeconomic Composition of Public High Schools , 2009, American sociological review.

[11]  B. Schneider,et al.  Social Capital, Information, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Math Course Work , 2010, American Journal of Education.

[12]  Ian Westbury Comparing American and Japanese Achievement: Is the United States Really a Low Achiever? , 1992 .

[13]  J. Straková,et al.  The role of the family and the school in the reproduction of educational inequalities in the post‐Communist Czech Republic , 2005 .

[14]  D. Baker,et al.  Mothers' Strategies for Children's School Achievement: Managing the Transition to High School. , 1986 .

[15]  D. Entwisle,et al.  Ability Group Effects: Instructional, Social, or Institutional?. , 1994 .

[16]  Rebecca Barr,et al.  Classroom Composition and the Design of Instruction. , 1988 .

[17]  R. Mare,et al.  Secondary School Tracking and Educational Inequality: Compensation, Reinforcement, or Neutrality? , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Barbara Schneider,et al.  Opportunities For Learning: Course Sequences and Positional Advantages , 1997 .

[19]  H. Gintis,et al.  Schooling in Capitalist America , 1976 .

[20]  A. Bryk,et al.  Curriculum Tracking as Mediating the Social Distribution of High School Achievement. , 1988 .

[21]  C. Lardy Mathematics and Science Education , 2011 .

[22]  T. Neville Postlethwaite,et al.  International encyclopedia of national systems of education , 1996 .

[23]  Ben Dalton,et al.  Interpersonal influences and educational aspirations in 12 countries: The importance of institutional context: , 2002 .

[24]  Daniele Checchi,et al.  Does School Tracking Affect Equality of Opportunity? New International Evidence , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  Sylke V. Schnepf,et al.  Social segregation in secondary schools: how does England compare with other countries? , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  C. Adelman Answers In The Tool Box: Academic Intensity, Attendance Patterns, And Bachelor's Degree Attainment , 1999 .

[27]  Michael L. Smith,et al.  The Determination of College Expectations in OECD Countries: The Role of Individual and Structural Factors , 2007 .

[28]  M. Duru-Bellat,et al.  Organisation and Context, Efficiency and Equity of Educational Systems: What PISA Tells Us , 2005 .

[29]  H. Oswald School Charter and Parental Management in West Germany. , 1988 .

[30]  S. Lamb,et al.  Classroom and School Factors Affecting Mathematics Achievement: A Comparative Study of Australia and the United States Using TIMSS , 2002 .

[31]  Samuel R. Lucas,et al.  Effectively Maintained Inequality: Education Transitions, Track Mobility, and Social Background Effects1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  A. Heidenheimer The Politics of Educational Reform: Explaining Different Outcomes of School Comprehensivization Attempts in Sweden and West Germany , 1974, Comparative Education Review.

[33]  Leland S. Cogan,et al.  Who Takes What Math and in Which Track? Using TIMSS to Characterize U.S. Students’ Eighth-Grade Mathematics Learning Opportunities , 2001 .

[34]  A. Manning,et al.  Comprehensive Versus Selective Schooling in England in Wales: What Do We Know? , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[35]  M. Duru-Bellat Social Inequalities in French Secondary Schools: From Figures to Theories. , 1996 .

[36]  Adam Gamoran,et al.  Instructional and Institutional Effects of Ability Grouping. , 1986 .

[37]  L. Mcdonnell Opportunity to Learn as a Research Concept and a Policy Instrument , 1995 .

[38]  Tihomir Asparouhov,et al.  Multilevel Modeling of Complex Survey Data , 2006 .

[39]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis , 1990 .

[40]  Koreny Ágnes Eurydice - The information network on education in Europe , 2007 .

[41]  David N. Figlio,et al.  School Choice and the Distributional Effects of Ability Tracking: Does Separation Increase Equality? , 2000 .

[42]  Barbara Schneider,et al.  The ambitious generation : America's teenagers, motivated but directionless , 2000 .

[43]  H. Blossfeld,et al.  Persisting Barriers: Changes in Educational Opportunities in Thirteen Countries. EUI Working Paper. , 1991 .

[44]  Judith Ireson,et al.  Academic self-concepts in adolescence: Relations with achievement and ability grouping in schools , 2009 .

[45]  G. Marks Cross-National Differences and Accounting for Social Class Inequalities in Education , 2005 .

[46]  R. Rubinson Class Formation, Politics, and Institutions: Schooling in the United States , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  C. Muller,et al.  Hidden Disparities: How Courses and Curricula Shape Opportunities in Mathematics During High School , 2010, Equity & excellence in education : University of Massachusetts School of Education journal.

[48]  H. Shimizu,et al.  What Is Tracking? Cultural Expectations in the United States, Germany, and Japan , 2003 .

[49]  Min-Hsiung Huang,et al.  Classroom homogeneity and the distribution of student math performance: A country-level fixed-effects analysis , 2009 .

[50]  G. Marks Are between- and within-school differences in student performance largely due to socio-economic background? Evidence from 30 countries , 2006 .

[51]  Samuel R. Lucas,et al.  Sociodemographic Diversity, Correlated Achievement, and De Facto Tracking , 2002 .

[52]  Ludger Woessmann,et al.  Education Policy and Equality of Opportunity , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[53]  U. Trautwein,et al.  Educational transitions and differential learning environments: How explicit between-school tracking contributes to social inequality in educational outcomes , 2008 .

[54]  Catherine Riegle-Crumb The Path through Math: Course Sequences and Academic Performance at the Intersection of Race‐Ethnicity and Gender , 2006, American Journal of Education.

[55]  A. Wells,et al.  The Politics of Culture: Understanding Local Political Resistance to Detracking in Racially Mixed Schools. , 1996 .

[56]  Barbara Schneider,et al.  Sequences of opportunities for learning , 1994 .

[57]  Herman G. van de Werfhorst,et al.  Achievement Inequality and the Institutional Structure of Educational Systems: A Comparative Perspective , 2010 .

[58]  Andreas Ammermüller Educational Opportunities and the Role of Institutions , 2005 .

[59]  D. Solorzano,et al.  in Public High Schools , 2016 .

[60]  J. Oakes Keeping Track: Structuring Equality and Inequality in an Era of Accountability , 2008, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[61]  A. Krueger,et al.  Evidence from Taiwan , 1994 .

[62]  Emma L. Smith,et al.  An international comparison of equity in education systems , 2004 .

[63]  Robert F. Boruch,et al.  Effects of Advanced Course-taking on Math and Science Achievement: Addressing Selection Bias Using Propensity Scores , 2004 .

[64]  David K. Cohen,et al.  Schooling in Capitalist America. , 1977 .

[65]  R. Turner Sponsored and Contest Mobility and the School System , 1960 .

[66]  S. Rabe-Hesketh,et al.  Multilevel modelling of complex survey data , 2006 .

[67]  William H. Schmidt,et al.  Why Schools Matter: A Cross-National Comparison of Curriculum and Learning , 2001 .

[68]  James Symons,et al.  Attainment in Secondary School , 1997 .

[69]  Ariane Baye,et al.  Measuring and Comparing the Equity of Education Systems in Europe , 2008 .

[70]  Samuel R. Lucas,et al.  Tracking Inequality: Stratification and Mobility in American High Schools , 2001 .

[71]  G. Brunello,et al.  Why is the Timing of School Tracking so Heterogeneous? , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[72]  Robert Bozick,et al.  Mathematics Coursetaking and Achievement at the End of High School: Evidence from the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS:2002). Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2008-319. , 2007 .

[73]  J. Eccles,et al.  Parental Influence on Students' Educational Choices in the United States and Germany: Different Ramifications—Same Effect? , 2002 .

[74]  John W. Meyer The Effects of Education as an Institution , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[75]  A. C. Kerckhoff,et al.  Effects of Ability Grouping in British Secondary Schools. , 1986 .

[76]  Frauke Kreuter,et al.  A Survey on Survey Statistics: What is Done and Can be Done in Stata , 2007 .

[77]  J. Oakes,et al.  Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. , 1986 .

[78]  Daniel A. McFarland Curricular Flows: Trajectories, Turning Points, and Assignment Criteria in High School Math Careers , 2006 .

[79]  C. Broaded The Limits and Possibilities of Tracking: Some Evidence from Taiwan. , 1997 .

[80]  Kenneth A. Frank,et al.  The Social Dynamics of Mathematics Coursetaking in High School1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[81]  M. Jakubowski Institutional Tracking and Achievement Growth: Exploring Difference-in-Differences Approach to PIRLS, TIMSS, and PISA Data , 2010 .