Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Velopharyngeal Structures in Chinese Children After Primary Palatal Repair

Background:Velopharyngeal inadequacy (VPI) after primary palatal repair remains a persistent problem despite advanced surgical techniques. Velopharyngeal inadequacy has significant negative impacts on patients' speech intelligibility and quality. Previous studies have produced conflicting results regarding the causes of VPI, which are likely due to limitations in two-dimensional imaging techniques used as well as failure to include matched groups with repaired cleft palate and differing velopharyngeal outcome. The present study aimed to investigate the characteristics of the velopharyngeal structures, including the levator veli palatini muscles, in children with repaired cleft palate and different speech outcomes. Methods:A prescan training was performed to help the child participants to finish scans successfully without general anesthesia. Multiple high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging scans covering the whole head and focusing on the velopharyngeal region, including the levator veli palatini muscles, were acquired in 3 matched groups of young children: children with cleft palate and VPI, children with cleft palate and adequate velopharyngeal closure, and children without cleft palate. Results:There were few significant differences between the 2 groups with cleft palate, although the functional pharyngeal dimensions were slightly greater in the children with VPI. More significant differences were found between the children with cleft palate and the control subjects. Conclusions:Anatomic characteristics of the velopharyngeal structures may be slightly less advantageous for velopharyngeal closure in children with VPI after palatal repair, but these structural differences alone cannot explain VPI.

[1]  J. Curran,et al.  Frequency of pharyngoplasty after primary repair of cleft palate. , 2002, Journal.

[2]  K. Sie Cleft palate speech and velopharyngeal insufficiency: surgical approach. , 2006, B-ENT.

[3]  D. Larossa,et al.  The state of the art in cleft palate surgery. , 2000, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[4]  K. Satoh,et al.  The effect of growth of nasopharyngeal structures in velopharyngeal closure in patients with repaired cleft palate and controls without clefts: a cephalometric study. , 2002, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[5]  Halil Arslan,et al.  Evaluation of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing Velopharyngeal Insufficiency During Phonation , 2008, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[6]  Noam Alperin,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Levator Veli Palatini Muscle in Speakers with Repaired Cleft Palate , 2007, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[7]  J. Marsh,et al.  The Evolution of Velopharyngeal Imaging , 2000, Annals of plastic surgery.

[8]  D P Kuehn,et al.  A cineradiographic investigation of velar movement variables in two normals. , 1976, The Cleft palate journal.

[9]  P. Gorman,et al.  Incidence of operative procedures on cleft lip and palate patients. , 1999, Annals of plastic surgery.

[10]  J. Mulliken,et al.  Velopharyngeal function in nonsyndromic cleft palate: relevance of surgical technique, age at repair, and cleft type. , 1998, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[11]  S. Sakoda,et al.  A cephalometric study by multivariate analysis of growth of the bony nasopharynx in patients with clefts and non-cleft controls. , 1998, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[12]  A. Jawad,et al.  Palatal Length in Cleft Palate as a Predictor of Speech Outcome , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  J. Fukuda,et al.  Velar ascent and morphological factors affecting velopharyngeal function in patients with cleft palate and noncleft controls: a cephalometric study. , 2005, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[14]  J. Pulkkinen,et al.  Craniofacial characteristics and velopharyngeal function in cleft lip/palate children with and without adenoidectomy , 2002, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[15]  Wei Tian,et al.  New Velopharyngeal Measurements at Rest and During Speech: Implications and Applications , 2009, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[16]  W. Tian,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the velopharyngeal mechanism at rest and during speech in Chinese adults and children. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[17]  K. Satoh,et al.  Comparison of nasopharyngeal growth between patients with clefts and noncleft controls. , 1997, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[18]  I. Jonas,et al.  Cephalometric assessment of the posterior airway space in patients with cleft palate after palatoplasty. , 2003, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[19]  M. S. Noordhoff,et al.  Nasopharyngoscopic Evaluation and Cephalometric Analysis of Velopharynx in Normal and Cleft Palate Patients , 1996, Annals of plastic surgery.

[20]  W. C. Trier,et al.  A comparison of palatoplasty techniques. , 1984, The Cleft palate journal.

[21]  Arun K Gosain,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Aid in the Dynamic Assessment of the Velopharyngeal Mechanism in Children , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  M. Omori,et al.  Cephalometric analysis in submucous cleft palate: comparison of cephalometric data obtained from submucous cleft palate patients with velopharyngeal competence and incompetence. , 2002, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[23]  T. Takato,et al.  The Outcome of Long‐Term Follow‐Up after Palatoplasty , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[24]  K. Gundlach,et al.  Incidence of velopharyngoplasty following various techniques of palatoplasty. , 1994, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[25]  David L. Jones,et al.  Efficacy of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Treatment of Hypernasality , 2002, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[26]  Sheng Li,et al.  Analysis of Velopharyngeal Morphology in Adults With Velopharyngeal Incompetence After Surgery of a Cleft Palate , 2006, Annals of plastic surgery.

[27]  A. Cila,et al.  Evaluation of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Nasoendoscopy , 2000, Annals of plastic surgery.

[28]  Jorma Rautio,et al.  Craniofacial cephalometric morphology in 6-year-old children with isolated cleft lip, isolated submucous cleft palate, and combined cleft lip and submucous cleft palate , 2007, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[29]  Robert Sader,et al.  Dynamic near‐real‐time magnetic resonance imaging for analyzing the velopharyngeal closure in comparison with videofluoroscopy , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[30]  K Klueber,et al.  Anatomy of musculus levator veli palatini in the 15-week human fetus. , 1979, Acta anatomica.

[31]  A. Stellzig-Eisenhauer The Influence of Cephalometric Parameters on Resonance of Speech in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients An Interdisciplinary Study , 2001, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[32]  M Fára,et al.  Abnormal anatomy of the muscles of palatopharyngeal closure in cleft palates: anatomical and surgical considerations based on the autopsies of 18 unoperated cleft palates. , 1970, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[33]  M. Haapanen,et al.  Hypernasality and the nasopharyngeal space. A cephalometric study. , 1991, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[34]  Y. Suzuki,et al.  Rapid magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of velopharyngeal muscle movement on phonation. , 1997, American journal of otolaryngology.

[35]  D P Kuehn,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Occult Submucous Cleft Palate , 2001, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[36]  H Y Kressel,et al.  Evaluation of Soft Palate Function with MRI: Application to the Cleft Palate Patient , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[37]  A. Athanasiou,et al.  Comparison of velopharyngeal growth patterns between cleft lip and/or palate patients requiring or not requiring pharyngeal flap surgery. , 1994, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[38]  J. D. Subtelny A CEPHALOMETRIC STUDY OF THE GROWTH OF THE SOFT PALATE , 1957, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[39]  F. Mehendale Surgical anatomy of the levator veli palatini: a previously undescribed tendinous insertion of the anterolateral fibers. , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[40]  David P Kuehn,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Levator Veli Palatini Muscle before and after Primary Palatoplasty , 2004, The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal.