Estimation of fundamental power quantities in single-phase systems under dynamic conditions

This paper deals with the estimation of the fundamental power quantities in single-phase system operating in dynamic conditions. To this aim, the TWLS-IpDFT algorithm is proposed. According to that algorithm, the parameters of the disturbing tones nearby the fundamental component are firstly estimated by the two-point Interpolated Discrete Fourier Transform (IpDFT) algorithm. Then these disturbances are removed from the original signal and the parameters of the fundamental component are estimated by applying the real-valued Taylor-based Weighted Least Squares (TWLS) algorithm to the residual signal. The effect of frequency uncertainty, wideband noise, and harmonics on the accuracy of the estimated fundamental power quantities is analyzed through computer simulations. Moreover, the accuracies of the TWLS-IpDFT, the classical two-point IpDFT and the three-point IpDFT algorithms are compared each other through extensive simulations under both steady-state and dynamic operating conditions.

[1]  Daniel Belega,et al.  Low-Complexity Least-Squares Dynamic Synchrophasor Estimation Based on the Discrete Fourier Transform , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[2]  Jalen Stremfelj,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation of Power Quantities in the Frequency Domain Using Rife-Vincent Windows , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[3]  Daniel Belega,et al.  Dynamic Phasor and Frequency Measurements by an Improved Taylor Weighted Least Squares Algorithm , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[4]  Roberto Langella,et al.  Unbalance Definition for Electrical Power Systems in the Presence of Harmonics and Interharmonics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[5]  A. Nuttall Some windows with very good sidelobe behavior , 1981 .

[6]  Daniel Belega,et al.  Performance of Synchrophasor Estimators in Transient Conditions: A Comparative Analysis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[7]  Alfredo Paolillo,et al.  Estimation of signal parameters in the frequency domain in the presence of harmonic interference: a comparative analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[8]  A.E. Emanuel,et al.  Summary of IEEE standard 1459: definitions for the measurement of electric power quantities under sinusoidal, nonsinusoidal, balanced, or unbalanced conditions , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[9]  Daniel Belega,et al.  Accuracy Analysis of the Multicycle Synchrophasor Estimator Provided by the Interpolated DFT Algorithm , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[10]  A.G. Phadke,et al.  Synchronized Phasor and Frequency Measurement Under Transient Conditions , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[11]  D. Belega,et al.  Multifrequency signal analysis by Interpolated DFT method with maximum sidelobe decay windows , 2009 .

[12]  A. E. Emanuel,et al.  On the assessment of harmonic pollution [of power systems] , 1995 .

[13]  José Antonio de la O. Serna,et al.  Dynamic Phasor and Frequency Estimates Through Maximally Flat Differentiators , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[14]  A. Testa,et al.  On the Processing of harmonics and interharmonics: using Hanning window in standard framework , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[15]  Carmine Landi,et al.  Accuracy Analysis of Algorithms Adopted in Voltage Dip Measurements , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[16]  Daniel Belega,et al.  Impact of harmonics on the interpolated DFT frequency estimator , 2016 .