Successful IT Outsourcing Engagement: Lessons from Malaysia

The literature on IT outsourcing is well‐developed with clear explanations of what may determine success. The context of IT outsourcing studies has primarily focused upon North American and European companies, seeking low‐cost economies from links with developing nations to gain competitive advantage. These studies may not be generalisable to companies based in developing economies, who may be trying to replicate successful outsourcing approaches. If the focus of outsourcing is primarily one of cost cutting, IT policy makers and managers in Malaysia cannot assume that successful outsourcing determinants are of any significance to them. This article therefore addresses the question of how generalisable the determinants of successful IT outsourcing are to a Malaysian context. The study is based upon a sample survey of companies in the Penang region of Malaysia. It presents and tests hypotheses on the nature of outsourcing relationships. In conclusion, Malaysian managers can take some comfort in that the lessons of outsourcing can be generalised to their context. Of particular note is the value of selective outsourcing in comparison to full outsourcing and the impacts of communication and management commitment.

[1]  Bandula Jayatilaka,et al.  Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature , 2004, DATB.

[2]  K. A. Gordon Outsourcing information technology , 1994 .

[3]  L. Willcocks,et al.  The Value of Selective IT Sourcing , 1996 .

[4]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The role of trust in outsourced IS development projects , 1999, CACM.

[5]  R. Klepper,et al.  Outsourcing information technology, systems and services , 1998 .

[6]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[7]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  REALIZING OUTSOURCING EXPECTATIONS Incredible Expectations, Credible Outcomes , 1994 .

[8]  A. Kadefors Trust in project relationships-inside the black box , 2004 .

[9]  James T. C. Teng,et al.  Theoretical perspectives on the outsourcing of information systems , 1995, J. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Mary Lacity,et al.  Lessons in Global Information Technology Sourcing , 2002, Computer.

[11]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Determinants of Information Technology Outsourcing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Anthony DiRomualdo,et al.  Strategic Intent for IT Outsourcing , 1998 .

[13]  Uma G. Gupta,et al.  Outsourcing the is function : it is necessary for your organization ? , 1992 .

[14]  Johan Lilliecreutz,et al.  Outsourcing—success or failure? , 1997 .

[15]  Joseph A. Yesulatitis Outsourcing for New Technology Adoption , 1997, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[16]  D. Bryde,et al.  Client versus contractor perspectives on project success criteria , 2005 .

[17]  R. Nolan,et al.  How to Manage an IT Outsourcing Alliance , 1995 .

[18]  Howard A. Rubin Using Metrics For Outsourcing Oversight , 1997, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[19]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  IT outsourcing as strategic partnering: the case of the UK Inland Revenue , 1998, ECIS.

[20]  Chris Fill,et al.  The outsourcing dilemma: a composite approach to the make or buy decision , 2000 .

[21]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Effect of Service Quality and Partnership on the Outsourcing of Information Systems Functions , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Uma G. Gupta,et al.  OUTSOURCING THE IS FUNCTION , 1992 .

[23]  Daniel Robey,et al.  A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships , 1992, MIS Q..