Research on pretensioned modular frame test and simulations

Abstract Corner supported modular system possess promising ability for high compression bearing which is suitable for high rise modular buildings. The economical approach to transfer forces and moments is to develop a more rigid connection between modules. This study investigated the seismic performance of a framed modular system with pretension assembled intermodular connections. A quasi-static loading test was performed on a full-scale pretension assembled framed modular system, with a loading process based on different earthquake design levels in China. Then, a simplified finite element modelling method was proposed to simulate the assembled compositions, and the effectiveness was verified with test data. Results showed that the pretension assembled connection had comparatively rigid connecting behavior. The modular frame had acceptable strength and stiffness within fortified intensity shake earthquake levels, and it satisfied ductility requirements without much structural failure. The frame exhibited self-centering deformation restoration after loading, and the strength degradation was mostly due to bonding loss within modular columns. Simulation results indicated that the pretension assembled framed modular system had different internal stress distribution from the traditional frame because of assembled compositions.

[1]  R. M. Lawson,et al.  Modular design for high-rise buildings , 2010 .

[2]  Rami A. Hawileh,et al.  Nonlinear finite element modeling of RC beams strengthened with NSM FRP rods , 2012 .

[3]  R. Mark Lawson,et al.  Application of Modular Construction in High-Rise Buildings , 2012 .

[4]  Habib Tabatabai,et al.  Nonlinear finite element analysis and modeling of a precast hybrid beam–column connection subjected to cyclic loads , 2010 .

[5]  Seungjae Lee,et al.  Verification of the Seismic Performance of a Rigidly Connected Modular System Depending on the Shape and Size of the Ceiling Bracket , 2017, Materials.

[6]  Maged A. Youssef,et al.  Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of modular steel-braced frames , 2009 .

[7]  M.A. Youssef,et al.  Effect of Directly Welded Stringer-To-Beam Connections on the Analysis and Design of Modular Steel Building Floors , 2009 .

[8]  Remo Pedreschi,et al.  Developments in pre-fabricated systems in light steel and modular construction , 2005 .

[9]  A. Fathieh,et al.  Three-Dimensional, Nonlinear, Dynamic Analysis of Modular Steel Buildings , 2014 .

[10]  Oya Mercan,et al.  Seismic evaluation of modular steel buildings , 2016 .

[11]  Jamal A. Abdalla,et al.  Modeling of nonlinear response of R/C shear deficient t-beam subjected to cyclic loading , 2012 .

[12]  Maged A. Youssef,et al.  ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION OF SEMI-RIGID FLOOR BEAMS CONNECTION IN MODULAR STEEL STRUCTURES , 2005 .

[13]  Maged A. Youssef,et al.  Seismic Overstrength in Braced Frames of Modular Steel Buildings , 2008 .

[14]  Bong-Ho Cho,et al.  Earthquake Resistance of Modular Building Units Using Load-Bearing Steel Stud Panels , 2013 .

[15]  Lin-Hai Han,et al.  Performance of concrete-filled thin-walled steel tubes under pure torsion , 2007 .

[16]  Chris I. Goodier,et al.  Design in Modular Construction , 2014 .

[17]  Charles W. Roeder,et al.  Embedded steel column-to-foundation connection for a modular structural system , 2016 .