Objective: This study aims to characterize and evaluate the NIH grant allocation pattern of COVID-19 research. Design: Cross sectional study Setting: COVID-19 NIH RePORTER Dataset was used to identify COVID-19 relevant grants. Participants: 1,108 grants allocated to COVID-19 research. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was to determine the number of grants and funding amount the NIH allocated for COVID-19 by research type and clinical/scientific area. The secondary outcome was to calculate the time from the funding opportunity announcement to the award notice date. Results: The NIH awarded a total of 56,169 grants in 2020, of which 2.0% (n=1,108) were allocated for COVID-19 research. The NIH had a $42 billion budget that year, of which 5.3% ($2.2 billion) was allocated to COVID-19 research. The most common clinical/scientific areas were social determinants of health (n=278, 8.5% of COVID-19 funding), immunology (n=211, 25.8%), and pharmaceutical interventions research (n=208, 47.6%). There were 104 grants studying COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions, of which 2 grants studied the efficacy of face masks and 6 studied the efficacy of social distancing. Of the 83 COVID-19 funded grants on transmission, 5 were awarded to study airborne transmission of COVID-19, and 2 grants on transmission of COVID-19 in schools. The average time from the funding opportunity announcement to the award notice date was 151 days (SD:57.9). Conclusion: In the first year of the pandemic, the NIH diverted a small fraction of its budget to COVID-19 research. Future health emergencies will require research funding to pivot in a timely fashion and funding levels to be proportional to the anticipated burden of disease in the population.
[1]
B. Sampat,et al.
The COVID-19 Innovation System.
,
2021,
Health affairs.
[2]
C. McCulloch,et al.
NIH Disease Funding Levels and Burden of Disease
,
2011,
PloS one.
[3]
N. Powe,et al.
The relation between funding by the National Institutes of Health and the burden of disease.
,
1999,
The New England journal of medicine.
[4]
S. Zieliński.
[For the public's health].
,
1974,
Pielegniarka i polozna.