Encapsulation and diagnosis with fault dictionaries

To date, test and diagnosis has been domain knowledge driven. However, as system complexity grows and we strive to develop reusable components, the concept of encapsulation becomes increasingly important. Encapsulation embodies the concepts of separation and partitioning. In this paper we deal with encapsulation by illustration of the fault dictionary approach to digital electronics. We then extend the concept of encapsulation to the system test approach as well as the development of maintenance systems. Finally we develop the concept that encapsulation is a key element in achieving general standardization open system architectures.

[1]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  John W. Sheppard,et al.  Improving the accuracy of diagnostics provided by fault dictionaries , 1996, Proceedings of 14th VLSI Test Symposium.

[3]  Kenneth R. Bowden,et al.  The Modern Fault Dictionary , 1985, ITC.

[4]  C.R. Unkle,et al.  Using dependency analysis to predict fault dictionary effectiveness , 1995, Conference Record AUTOTESTCON '95. 'Systems Readiness: Test Technology for the 21st Century'.

[5]  Rodham E. Tulloss,et al.  The Test Access Port and Boundary Scan Architecture , 1990 .

[6]  Melvin A. Breuer,et al.  Digital systems testing and testable design , 1990 .

[7]  Daniel G. Saab,et al.  Initialization of Sequential Circuits and its Application to ATPG , 1998, J. Electron. Test..

[8]  Matthew Goldstein,et al.  Kn -nearest Neighbor Classification , 1972, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  Bernd Becker,et al.  On the (non-)resetability of synchronous sequential circuits , 1996, Proceedings of 14th VLSI Test Symposium.