Trust Management for Software-Defined Heterogeneous Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks

Over the past few decades, a considerable amount of interest has been observed (in both academia and industry) for improving the overall road transportation across the globe, primarily to enhance the safety of vehicular passengers and vulnerable road pedestrians. Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (VANETs) are anticipated to play a critical role in smart cities and Internet of Things (IoT) domain. Instead, it is expected that a new paradigm of Internet of Vehicles (IoV) will soon become an important component of the IoT. Also, since the connected vehicles primarily disseminate safety-critical information, it is imperative to have an extremely secure and trusted network so that critical data information (or any other sort of sensory data information) could be traversed with extreme reliability and authenticity. Unlike conventional wired networks, vehicular networks are highly dynamic, distributed and of open nature, and are, therefore, susceptible to various attacks such as replay, spoofing, eavesdropping, man-in-the-middle, distributed denial-of-service, blackhole, grayhole, Sybil and other malware attacks. To address the same, numerous mechanisms have been proposed in the literature, mainly relying on traditional cryptography techniques. Nevertheless, cryptography-based solutions are not effective in VANETs since nodes in this network are highly dynamic and distributed across the network. Moreover, the network infrastructure cannot be guaranteed permanently, and cryptographic solutions may also get compromised due to insider attacks in a network. This chapter aims to provide an in-depth investigation of a diverse range of security attacks challenging the actual realisation of vehicular networks. In contrast to conventional security (cryptography-based) solutions, it brings forth the need for trust management for securing vehicular networks (a concept still in its early stages of development) for ensuring reliability, authenticity and relevance by revoking both malicious and selfish nodes. It also briefly highlights the need for trust models and illustrates the characteristics of data-oriented trust models, entity-oriented trust models and hybrid trust models. Furthermore, since the conventional networks are being transformed via the promising yet emerging notion of software-defined networking (SDN), a brief discussion is presented so as to illustrate how a reconfigurable, reprogrammable and agile infrastructure can help in guaranteeing more secure vehicular networking platforms which are indispensable for futuristic Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) applications and services.

[1]  Mohammad S. Obaidat,et al.  Securing vehicular networks: A reputation and plausibility checks-based approach , 2010, 2010 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[2]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  An Architecture for Hierarchical Software-Defined Vehicular Networks , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Fangyu Gai,et al.  Trust on the Ratee: A Trust Management System for Social Internet of Vehicles , 2017, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[4]  Wenjia Li,et al.  ART: An Attack-Resistant Trust Management Scheme for Securing Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  Antonella Molinaro,et al.  From Theory to Experimental Evaluation: Resource Management in Software-Defined Vehicular Networks , 2017, IEEE Access.

[6]  Virginia N. L. Franqueira,et al.  TEAM: A Trust Evaluation and Management Framework in Context-Enabled Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks , 2018, IEEE Access.

[7]  Daqiang Zhang,et al.  Cost-Efficient Sensory Data Transmission in Heterogeneous Software-Defined Vehicular Networks , 2016, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[8]  Junggab Son,et al.  A Hybrid Trust Management Framework for Vehicular Social Networks , 2016, CSoNet.

[9]  Rong Yu,et al.  Distributed Reputation Management for Secure and Efficient Vehicular Edge Computing and Networks , 2017, IEEE Access.

[10]  Anis Laouiti,et al.  VANet security challenges and solutions: A survey , 2017, Veh. Commun..

[11]  Sidi-Mohammed Senouci,et al.  A distributed detection and prevention scheme from malicious nodes in vehicular networks , 2016, Int. J. Commun. Syst..

[12]  Fernando Camacho,et al.  Emerging technologies and research challenges for intelligent transportation systems: 5G, HetNets, and SDN , 2017, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM).

[13]  Li Zhao,et al.  Support for vehicle-to-everything services based on LTE , 2016, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[14]  Sevil Sen,et al.  A survey of attacks and detection mechanisms on intelligent transportation systems: VANETs and IoV , 2017, Ad Hoc Networks.

[15]  Panagiotis Papadimitratos,et al.  On Data-Centric Trust Establishment in Ephemeral Ad Hoc Networks , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[16]  Fangyu Gai,et al.  Ratee-Based Trust Management System for Internet of Vehicles , 2017, WASA.

[17]  Shu Yang,et al.  Managing Trust for Intelligence Vehicles: A Cluster Consensus Approach , 2015, IOV.

[18]  Essaid Sabir,et al.  Meeting Always-Best-Connected paradigm in heterogeneous vehicular networks: A graph theory and a signaling game analysis , 2016, Veh. Commun..

[19]  Abdelhakim Hafid,et al.  Vehicle Software Updates Distribution with SDN and Cloud Computing , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[20]  Edison Pignaton de Freitas,et al.  On the impact of sybil attacks in cooperative driving scenarios , 2017, 2017 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops.

[21]  S. V. Kasmir Raja,et al.  Stimulating truth-telling and cooperation among nodes in VANETs through payment and punishment scheme , 2015, Ad Hoc Networks.

[22]  Wenchao Xu,et al.  Internet of vehicles in big data era , 2018, IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica.

[23]  Elisa Bertino,et al.  Information-Oriented Trustworthiness Evaluation in Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks , 2013, NSS.

[24]  N. Haddadou,et al.  Trust and exclusion in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks: An economic incentive model based approach , 2013, 2013 Computing, Communications and IT Applications Conference (ComComAp).

[25]  Abdul Hanan Abdullah,et al.  Trust management in vehicular ad hoc network: a systematic review , 2015, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[26]  Laizhong Cui,et al.  When big data meets software-defined networking: SDN for big data and big data for SDN , 2016, IEEE Network.

[27]  Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues,et al.  Secure and stable Vehicular Ad Hoc Network clustering algorithm based on hybrid mobility similarities and trust management scheme , 2018, Veh. Commun..

[28]  Kai Wang,et al.  Enabling Collaborative Edge Computing for Software Defined Vehicular Networks , 2018, IEEE Network.

[29]  Tie Qiu,et al.  Survey on fog computing: architecture, key technologies, applications and open issues , 2017, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[30]  Sidi-Mohammed Senouci,et al.  Predict and prevent from misbehaving intruders in heterogeneous vehicular networks , 2017, Veh. Commun..

[31]  Jiannong Cao,et al.  SDVN: enabling rapid network innovation for heterogeneous vehicular communication , 2016, IEEE Network.

[32]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Millimeter Wave Vehicular Communications: A Survey , 2016, Found. Trends Netw..

[33]  Ridha Soua,et al.  Enabling SDN in VANETs: What is the Impact on Security? , 2016, Sensors.

[34]  Sanjay Silakari,et al.  Detection of Malicious Nodes (DMN) in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks☆ , 2015 .

[35]  Xuemin Shen,et al.  Connected Vehicles: Solutions and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[36]  Miguel Morales-Sandoval,et al.  Multi-hop broadcast message dissemination in vehicular ad hoc networks: A security perspective review , 2017, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[37]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Internet of Vehicles: Architecture, Protocols, and Security , 2018, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[38]  Philippe J. Sartori,et al.  LTE evolution for vehicle-to-everything services , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[39]  Xinlei Zhang,et al.  Using trust model to ensure reliable data acquisition in VANETs , 2017, Ad Hoc Networks.

[40]  Sidi-Mohammed Senouci,et al.  An accurate and efficient collaborative intrusion detection framework to secure vehicular networks , 2015, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[41]  Muhammad Khurram Khan,et al.  Toward Secure Software Defined Vehicular Networks: Taxonomy, Requirements, and Open Issues , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[42]  Der-Jiunn Deng,et al.  Latency Control in Software-Defined Mobile-Edge Vehicular Networking , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[43]  Victor C. M. Leung,et al.  Blockchain-Based Decentralized Trust Management in Vehicular Networks , 2019, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[44]  Yacine Ghamri-Doudane,et al.  A Job Market Signaling Scheme for Incentive and Trust Management in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[45]  Xia Feng,et al.  A method for defensing against multi-source Sybil attacks in VANET , 2017, Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl..

[46]  Guozhu Liu,et al.  A Secure and Privacy-Preserving Navigation Scheme Using Spatial Crowdsourcing in Fog-Based VANETs , 2017, Sensors.

[47]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Millimeter-Wave Vehicular Communication to Support Massive Automotive Sensing , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[48]  David M. Eyers,et al.  Twenty Security Considerations for Cloud-Supported Internet of Things , 2016, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.