Reliability and validity of a brief physical activity assessment for use by family doctors

Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of a brief physical activity assessment tool suitable for doctors to use to identify inactive patients in the primary care setting. Methods: Volunteer family doctors (n  =  8) screened consenting patients (n  =  75) for physical activity participation using a brief physical activity assessment tool. Inter-rater reliability was assessed within one week (n  =  71). Validity was assessed against an objective physical activity monitor (computer science and applications accelerometer; n  =  42). Results: The brief physical activity assessment tool produced repeatable estimates of “sufficient total physical activity”, correctly classifying over 76% of cases (κ 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.72). The validity coefficient was reasonable (κ 0.40, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.69), with good percentage agreement (71%). Conclusions: The brief physical activity assessment tool is a reliable instrument, with validity similar to that of more detailed self report measures of physical activity. It is a tool that can be used efficiently in routine primary healthcare services to identify insufficiently active patients who may need physical activity advice.

[1]  Aun H Mirza,et al.  Posterior sternoclavicular dislocation in a rugby player as a cause of silent vascular compromise: a case report , 2005, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[2]  A. Bauman,et al.  Promoting physical activity in Australian general practices: a randomised trial of health promotion advice versus hypertension management. , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[3]  A. Manley Physical Activity And Health: A Report Of The Surgeon General , 2004 .

[4]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  Ben J. Smith,et al.  Promoting physical activity in general practice: a controlled trial of written advice and information materials , 2000, British journal of sports medicine.

[6]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Review of primary care-based physical activity intervention studies: effectiveness and implications for practice and future research. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[7]  J F Sallis,et al.  Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[8]  A. Bauman,et al.  Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians. , 1997, Preventive medicine.

[9]  B. Blanksby,et al.  Beliefs and behaviour of general practitioners regarding promotion of physical activity. , 2010, Australian journal of public health.

[10]  ROBERT W. Johnson,et al.  Healthy people. , 1985, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.