Prescriptive Knowledge in IS Research: Conceptualizing Design Principles in Terms of Materiality, Action, and Boundary Conditions

In the IS discipline, the formulation of design principles is an important vehicle to convey design knowledge that contributes beyond instantiations applicable in a limited context of use. However, their formulation still varies in terms of orientation, clarity, and precision. In this paper, we focus on the design of artifacts that are oriented towards human use, and we identify and analyze three orientations in the formulation of such design principles in IS journals -- action oriented, materiality oriented, and both action and materiality oriented. We propose an effective and actionable formulation of design principles that is both clear and precise.

[1]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Does Technology Use Enable Network Change in Organizations? A Comparative Study of Feature Use and Shared Affordances , 2013, MIS Q..

[2]  I. Niiniluoto.  The aim and structure of applied research , 1993 .

[3]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Design Principles for Competence Management Systems: A Synthesis of an Action Research Study , 2004, MIS Q..

[5]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Omar A. El Sawy,et al.  Assessing Information System Design Theory in Perspective: How Useful Was our 1992 Initial Rendition? , 2004 .

[7]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Information Technology, Materiality, and Organizational Change: A Professional Odyssey , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Jan van den Akker,et al.  Principles and Methods of Development Research , 1999 .

[9]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .

[10]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  A NeuroDesign Model for IS Research , 2014, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[11]  Roman Lukyanenko,et al.  Instantiation Validity in IS Design Research , 2014, DESRIST.

[12]  Michael S. H. Heng,et al.  From Habermas's communicative theory to practice on the internet , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[13]  Nikunj P. Dalal,et al.  Understanding Web home page perception , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[14]  M. Bunge,et al.  Scientific Research I: The Search for System , 1967 .

[15]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Can Software Influence Creativity? , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Paulo B. Góes,et al.  Editor's comments: design science research in top information systems journals , 2014 .

[17]  W. Orlikowski.  The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research , 2010 .

[18]  William Lidwell,et al.  Universal Principles of Design , 2003 .

[19]  A. Chemero.  An Outline of a Theory of Affordances , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[20]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[22]  Peter B. M. Vranas,et al.  New Foundations for Imperative Logic I: Logical Connectives, Consistency, and Quantifiers* , 2008 .

[23]  Johann Füller,et al.  Co-Creation in Virtual Worlds: The Design of the User Experience , 2011, MIS Q..

[24]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Reflection, Abstraction And Theorizing In Design And Development Research , 2013, ECIS.

[25]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[26]  R. Watson,et al.  Improving the Societal Effectiveness of IS Research: The Pursuit of Prescriptive Accuracy , 2014 .

[27]  Paul Portner,et al.  The Semantics of Imperatives within a Theory of Clause Types , 2004 .

[28]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[29]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  K. Popper.  Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography , 1976 .

[31]  J. J. Gibson.  The theory of affordances , 1977 .

[32]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[33]  Chetan S. Sankar,et al.  Tailoring Database Training for End Users , 1993, MIS Q..

[34]  Enid Mumford,et al.  The story of socio‐technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[35]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Toward "Third Wave" Information Systems Research: Linking Sociomaterial Practice with Broader Institutional Logics , 2013, ICIS.

[36]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[37]  Gerhard Schwabe,et al.  Communicating Nascent Design Theories on Innovative Information Systems through Multi-grounded Design Principles , 2014, DESRIST.

[38]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Julie Fisher,et al.  E-Commerce Research in Australia: Inviting a Comparative Analysis , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Research in Information Systems , 2010 .

[41]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  User involvement in developing mobile and temporarily interconnected systems , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..