To What Degree Does the Desire for Promotion Motivate Faculty to Perform Research? Testing the Expectancy Theory

Based on the rationale of expectancy theory, this article examines to what degree the desire for promotion motivates faculty to do research. Using Taiwanese faculty survey data, it is found that faculty members who show higher motivation for promotion display better research performance than their colleagues who show lower motivation for promotion. This article also indicates that different kinds of rewards have different motivating effects on various types of faculty research performance. After controlling for the effects of demographic, educational, and institutional variables, the results of logistic regressions show that faculty who think promotion and the satisfaction of curiosity are important tend to publish articles; faculty who want to demonstrate their mastery of their disciplines tend to publish books; and faculty who care about personal income are more likely to seek and receive the National Science Council Research Outcome Grant.

[1]  A. R. Ilersic,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1961 .

[2]  V. Vroom Work and motivation , 1964 .

[3]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  The influence of valence, instrumentality, and expectancy on effort and performance. , 1973 .

[4]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Expectancy models of job satisfaction, occupational preference and effort: A theoretical, methodological, and empirical appraisal. , 1974 .

[5]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Social Stratification in Science , 1974 .

[6]  H. Tuckman Publication, teaching, and the academic reward structure , 1976 .

[7]  J. W. Holley Tenure and research productivity , 1977 .

[8]  R. Beck,et al.  Motivation: Theories and Principles , 1978 .

[9]  S. Harter Effectance Motivation Reconsidered. Toward a Developmental Model , 1978 .

[10]  Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi,et al.  Intrinsic Rewards and Emergent Motivation , 1978 .

[11]  N. Schmitt,et al.  An evaluation of valence models of motivation to pursue various post high school alternatives , 1981 .

[12]  W. Becker,et al.  Academic Rewards in Higher Education. , 1981 .

[13]  J. A. Walsh,et al.  Pretenure and posttenure productivity trends of academic psychologists. , 1982 .

[14]  M. F. Fox Publication Productivity among Scientists: A Critical Review , 1983 .

[15]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[16]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Faculty Research Performance: Lessons from the Sciences and the Social Sciences. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1985. , 1985 .

[17]  Michael S. McPherson,et al.  The American Academic Profession: A Synthesis of Social Scientific Inquiry Since World War II , 1985 .

[18]  K. Ruscio The Distinctive Scholarship of the Selective Liberal Arts College , 1987 .

[19]  George D. Kuh,et al.  The "Writing Wing": Characteristics of Prolific Contributors to the Higher Education Literature , 1987 .

[20]  M. Csíkszentmihályi The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. , 1988 .

[21]  Martin J. Finkelstein The American Academic Profession: A Synthesis of Social Scientific Inquiry Since World War II , 1988 .

[22]  Philip M. Podsakoff,et al.  The effects of "intrinsic" and "extrinsic" reinforcement contingencies on task behavior. , 1988 .

[23]  John K. Butler,et al.  Extrinsic Reward Valences and Productivity of Business Faculty: A within-and between-Subjects Decision Modeling Experiment , 1989 .

[24]  R. Bentley Faculty research performance over time and its relationship to sources of grant support. , 1990 .

[25]  Kazuo Yamaguchi,et al.  Event History Analysis. , 1992 .

[26]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[27]  H. Zuckerman,et al.  The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community , 1991 .

[28]  F. Tien Promotion, motivation, and faculty research productivity: Theory testing and model construction for a Taiwanese setting. , 1994 .

[29]  Robert T. Blackburn,et al.  Faculty at Work: Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction , 1995 .

[30]  Flora F. Tien,et al.  Faculty Rank System, Research Motivation, and Faculty Research Productivity: Measure Refinement and Theory Testing , 1996 .