The Pedagogy of Mobility

Direct student experience of the real, live organism, object, place or environment is recognised by teachers and other educators as having powerful potential for high quality learning. Rendering this rich experience into explicit learning contexts for students remains an on-going pedagogical challenge. The use of mobile technologies as a way for students to capture their experience as it happens in the real world holds great promise as a vehicle to support authentic learning. This chapter presents a series of cases where different school groups were challenged with different mobile learning activities. The first two cases are derived from research studies in the local environment. In these two cases students were involved in inquiry-based learning where they used data collected in the field with handheld computer and digital cameras to assess the health of their local environment. The second two cases are derived from complementary geography tasks in the field. In one case students worked in pairs to navigate a given route, and in the fourth engaged in a debate about an issue pertaining to urban planning using textand picturemessaging technologies. The results of the cases are analysed with a view to generating some general principles around the technologies, the activities and the tools that comprise the pedagogies embodied in these cases. It is hoped that they will inform more effective professional practice, specifically when teaching spatially dependent tasks and, more generally, in mobile collaborative learning environments. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61692-849-0.ch014

[1]  M. Kent,et al.  Fieldwork in geography teaching: A critical review of the literature and approaches , 1997 .

[2]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[3]  Yuh-Shyan Chen,et al.  A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[4]  Erin Baumgartner,et al.  A case study of project‐based instruction in the ninth grade: a semester‐long study of intertidal biodiversity , 2008 .

[5]  Patrick J. Fahy Assessing Critical Thinking Processes in a Computer Conference. , 2007 .

[6]  Victoria Cook,et al.  The field as a ‘pedagogical resource’? A critical analysis of students’ affective engagement with the field environment , 2008 .

[7]  John Halocha,et al.  Developing a Research Tool to Enable Children to Voice their Experiences and Learning through Fieldwork , 2005 .

[8]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[9]  S. Grundy Curriculum: Product Or Praxis? , 1987 .

[10]  Karen Swan,et al.  Uses and Effects of Mobile Computing Devices in K–8 Classrooms , 2005 .

[11]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[12]  Kenneth Y. T. Lim,et al.  Pictures in Place: Adolescent Usage of Multimedia Messaging in the Negotiation, Construction and Sharing of Meaning about Local Environments , 2004 .

[13]  Baohui Zhang,et al.  Handheld Computers as Cognitive Tools: An Environmental Learning Project in Singapore , 2007, ICCE.

[14]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Conflict in the Classroom: Controversy And Learning , 1979 .

[15]  Edwin Chew,et al.  Views, Values and Perceptions in Geographical Fieldwork in Singapore Schools , 2008 .

[16]  Matt Bower,et al.  Affordance analysis – matching learning tasks with learning technologies , 2008 .

[17]  Greg Spellman,et al.  Geography fieldwork, fieldwork value and learning styles , 2009 .

[18]  Roy Ballantyne,et al.  Introducing a fifth pedagogy: experience‐based strategies for facilitating learning in natural environments , 2009 .

[19]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  Toward an agenda for advancing research on science learning in out-of-school settings , 2003 .