Innovation through virtual communities of Practice: motivation and constraints in the knowledge-creation process

Communities of Practice are places which provide a sound basis for organizational learning, enabling knowledge creation and acquisition thus improving organizational performance, leveraging innovation and consequently increasing competitively. Virtual Communities of Practice (VCoP"s) can perform a central role in promoting communication and collaboration between members who are dispersed in both time and space. The ongoing case study, described here, aims to identify both the motivations and the constraints that members of an organization experience when taking part in the knowledge creating processes of the VCoP"s to which they belong. Based on a literature review, we have identified several factors that influence such processes; they will be used to analyse the results of interviews carried out with the leaders of VCoP"s in four multinationals. As future work, a questionnaire will be developed and administered to the other members of these VCoP"s

[1]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[2]  Chun Wei Choo,et al.  Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related? , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[3]  Line Dubé,et al.  Towards a Typology of Virtual Communities of Practice , 2006 .

[4]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[5]  Joanne Roberts.  Limits to Communities of Practice , 2006 .

[6]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[7]  Lokman I. Meho.  E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Soonhee Kim,et al.  Employee Knowledge Sharing Capabilities in Public & Private Organizations: Does Organizational Context Matter? , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  M. Sharratt,et al.  Understanding Knowledge-Sharing in Online Communities of Practice , 2003 .

[10]  Geoff Foster,et al.  Fishing with the net fur research data , 1994, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[11]  L. Engwall,et al.  Introduction: Management Consulting as a Knowledge Industry , 2002 .

[12]  J. Lehu,et al.  Back to life! Why brands grow old and sometimes die and what managers then do: an exploratory qualitative research put into the French context , 2004 .

[13]  A. Amin,et al.  Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice , 2008 .

[14]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Using students' perceptions of participation in collaborative learning activities in the design of online learning environments , 2001, Educ. Inf..

[15]  K. Sheehan.  Response Variation in E-Mail Surveys: An Exploration , 1999 .

[16]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students (2nd edition) , 2000 .

[17]  L. Chung.  THE ROLE OF MANAGEMENT IN KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER , 2001 .

[18]  Simon Grand,et al.  From economic theory towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm: Conceptual building blocks , 2002 .

[19]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[20]  H. Kelley,et al.  Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence , 1978 .

[21]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Creation and recreation: motivating collaboration to generate knowledge capital in online communities , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Manag..