Embedded System Development Process: A Quest from Innovation to Adaption

This paper describes the findings of a case study that explores the improvisation and bricolage in a structured process management environment. The research focuses on software developers in an embedded system development project. This investigation adopts an interpretive approach, which involves the collection and analysis of qualitative data. The research offers insights into a range of dimensions, levels, and paradoxes of improvisation and bricolage that can be observed during a system development in a structured process environment. Furthermore, the paper addresses the question of how the structured process environment influences these dimensions, levels, and paradoxes. We observed various degrees of bricolage and improvisation with the movement of highly innovative practices towards a development phase of adaptive practices. This paper points out the value of structured processes as a scaffolding for improvisational and bricolage techniques and practices. The paper claims that within a turbulent environment, improvised and bricolage practices need pieces of structured processes reciprocity.

[1]  J. Innes,et al.  Consensus Building as Role Playing and Bricolage , 2007 .

[2]  M. Magnusson,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities in Early-Phase Entrepreneurship , 2006 .

[3]  Andrew C. Corbett,et al.  Proclivity for Improvisation as a Predictor of Entrepreneurial Intentions , 2006 .

[4]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[5]  M. Cunha Bricolage in Organizations , 2005 .

[6]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  The organizing vision of application service provision: a process-oriented analysis , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[7]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Improvising firms: bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process , 2003 .

[8]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[9]  Ali E. Akgün,et al.  New product development team improvisation and speed‐to‐market: an extended model , 2002 .

[10]  J. M. Macpherson,et al.  Global Competition, Institutions, and the Diffusion of Organizational Practices: The International Spread of ISO 9000 Quality Certificates , 2002 .

[11]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  The labyrinths of Information , 2002 .

[12]  H. V. D. Water,et al.  ISO 9000 series ‐ Certification and performance , 2001 .

[13]  S. Rahman A comparative study of TQM practice and organisational performance of SMEs with and without ISO 9000 certification , 2001 .

[14]  Gavin P. M. Dick ISO 9000 certification benefits, reality or myth? , 2000 .

[15]  Tore Dybå Improvisation in Small Software Organizations , 2000, IEEE Software.

[16]  Edward A. Lee,et al.  What's Ahead for Embedded Software? , 2000, Computer.

[17]  Mie Augier,et al.  Networks, cognition and management of tacit knowledge , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[18]  M. Cunha,et al.  Organizational improvisation: what, when, how, and why , 1999 .

[19]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory , 1998 .

[20]  K. Weick Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis , 1998 .

[21]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[22]  C. Ciborra The Platform Organization: Recombining Strategies, Structures, and Surprises , 1996 .

[23]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Jaideep Motwani,et al.  A roadmap to implementing ISO 9000 , 1996 .

[25]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[26]  David E. Avison,et al.  The discipline of information systems: Let many flowers bloom! , 1995, ISCO.

[27]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[28]  N. Guynn,et al.  Bricolage: An Interview With Michel Butor , 1994 .

[29]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[30]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[31]  K. Weick Organizational redesign as improvisation , 1993 .

[32]  James Backhouse,et al.  On the discipline of information systems , 1991, Inf. Syst. J..

[33]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations , 1988 .

[35]  A. Giddens The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[36]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[37]  E. Shils The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[38]  C. Lévi-Strauss The Savage Mind , 1967 .