A Machine-Learning Approach for the Reconstruction of Ground-Shaking Fields in Real Time

Real-time seismic monitoring is of primary importance for rapid and targeted emergency operations after potentially destructive earthquakes. A key aspect in determining the impact of an earthquake is the reconstruction of the ground-shaking field, usually expressed as the ground-motion parameter. Traditional algorithms compute the ground-shaking field from the punctual data at the stations relying on ground-motion prediction equations computed on estimates of the earthquake location and magnitude when the instrumental data are missing. The results of such algorithms are then subordinate to the evaluation of location and magnitude, which can take several minutes. To fill the temporal gap between the arrival of the data and the estimate of these parameters, a new data-driven algorithm that exploits the information from the station data only is introduced. This algorithm, consisting of an ensemble of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on a database of ground-shaking maps produced with traditional algorithms, can provide estimates of the ground-shaking maps and their associated uncertainties in real time. Because CNNs cannot handle sparse data, a Voronoi tessellation of a selected peak ground parameter recorded at the stations is computed and used as the input to the CNNs; site effects and network geometry are accounted for using a (normalized) VS30 map and a station location map, respectively. The developed method is robust to noise, can handle network geometry changes over time without the need for retraining, and can resolve multiple simultaneous events. Although having a lower resolution, the results obtained are statistically compatible with the ones from traditional methods. A fully operational version of the algorithm is running on the servers at the Department of Mathematics and Geosciences of the University of Trieste, showing real-time capabilities in handling stations from multiple Italian strong-motion networks and outputting results with a resolution of 0.05° × 0.05°.

[1]  D. Wald,et al.  ShakeMap operations, policies, and procedures , 2021, Earthquake Spectra.

[2]  Maria Concetta Lorenzino,et al.  Seismic Surveillance and Earthquake Monitoring in Italy , 2021 .

[3]  Kunihiko Taira,et al.  Global field reconstruction from sparse sensors with Voronoi tessellation-assisted deep learning , 2021, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[4]  H. Seligson,et al.  A domestic earthquake impact alert protocol based on the combined USGS PAGER and FEMA Hazus loss estimation systems , 2020 .

[5]  Rodolfo Puglia,et al.  The New ShakeMap in Italy: Progress and Advances in the Last 10 Yr , 2019, Seismological Research Letters.

[6]  Peter Gerstoft,et al.  Machine Learning in Seismology: Turning Data into Insights , 2018, Seismological Research Letters.

[7]  Nicholas Gregor,et al.  BC Hydro Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Subduction Earthquakes , 2016 .

[8]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[9]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[10]  H. Langer,et al.  Prediction of ground motion parameters for the volcanic area of Mount Etna , 2015, Journal of Seismology.

[11]  Giovanna Cultrera,et al.  Shakemaps uncertainties and their effects in the post-seismic actions for the 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquakes , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[12]  R. Puglia,et al.  Pan-European ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5 %-damped PSA at spectral periods up to 3.0 s using the RESORCE dataset , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[13]  D. Bindi,et al.  Ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian strong motion database , 2011 .

[14]  P. Suhadolc,et al.  ShakeMaps for three relevant earthquakes in the Southeastern Alps: Comparison between instrumental and observed intensities , 2011 .

[15]  P. Suhadolc,et al.  The Friuli Venezia Giulia Accelerometric Network: RAF , 2010 .

[16]  A. Gorini,et al.  The Italian strong motion network , 2010 .

[17]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines , 2010, ICML.

[18]  P. Suhadolc,et al.  Real-Time Generation of ShakeMaps in the Southeastern Alps , 2009 .

[19]  Kuo-Wan Lin,et al.  An Atlas of ShakeMaps and population exposure catalog for earthquake loss modeling , 2009 .

[20]  Simone Marzorati,et al.  Empirical ground motion prediction equations for northern italy using weak and strong motion amplitudes, frequency content and duration parameters , 2008 .

[21]  Kuo-Wan Lin,et al.  ShakeCast: Automating and Improving the Use of ShakeMap for Post-Earthquake Decision-Making and Response , 2008 .

[22]  Kuo-Wan Lin,et al.  Quantifying and Qualifying USGS ShakeMap Uncertainty , 2008 .

[23]  A. Zollo,et al.  The Irpinia Seismic Network: An Advanced Monitoring Infrastructure For Earthquake Early Warning in The Campania Region (Southern Italy) , 2007 .

[24]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[25]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Empirical Prediction Equations for Peak Ground Velocity Derived from Strong-Motion Records from Europe and the Middle East , 2007 .

[26]  Dario Slejko,et al.  Empirical Ground-Motion Attenuation Relations for the Eastern Alps in the Magnitude Range 2.5–6.3 , 2005 .

[27]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Empirical Ground-Motion Relations for Subduction-Zone Earthquakes and Their Application to Cascadia and Other Regions , 2003 .

[28]  Thomas G. Dietterich Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning , 2000, Multiple Classifier Systems.

[29]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  TriNet “ShakeMaps”: Rapid Generation of Peak Ground Motion and Intensity Maps for Earthquakes in Southern California , 1999 .

[30]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Relationships between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California , 1999 .

[31]  Paul W. Munro,et al.  Reducing Variance of Committee Prediction with Resampling Techniques , 1996, Connect. Sci..

[32]  F. Sabetta,et al.  Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[33]  Franz Aurenhammer,et al.  Voronoi diagrams—a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure , 1991, CSUR.

[34]  Lawrence D. Jackel,et al.  Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition , 1989, Neural Computation.