Noninducibility in Postinfarction Ventricular Tachycardia as an End Point for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation and Its Effects on Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis

Background—Although ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation is a widely used therapy for patients with VT, the ideal end points for this procedure are not well defined. We performed a meta-analysis of the published literature to assess the predictive value of noninducibility of postinfarction VT for long-term outcomes after VT ablation. Methods and Results—We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE (1950–2013), EMBASE (1988–2013), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Fourth Quarter, 2012), and reports presented at scientific meetings (1994–2013). Randomized controlled trials, case–control, and cohort studies of VT ablation were included. Outcomes reported in eligible studies were freedom from VT/ventricular fibrillation and all-cause mortality. Of the 3895 studies evaluated, we identified 8 cohort studies enrolling 928 patients for the meta-analysis. Noninducibility after VT ablation was associated with a significant increase in arrhythmia-free survival compared with partial success (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.29–0.84; P=0.009) or failed ablation procedure (odds ratio, 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.06–0.18; P<0.001). There was also a significant reduction in all-cause mortality if patients were noninducible after VT ablation compared with patients with partial success (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.36–0.98; P=0.04) or failed ablation (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.10–0.99; P=0.049). Conclusions—Noninducibility of VT after VT ablation is associated with improved arrhythmia-free survival and all-cause mortality.

[1]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Management of Ventricular Tachycardia in the Setting of a Dedicated Unit for the Treatment of Complex Ventricular Arrhythmias: Long-Term Outcome After Ablation , 2013, Circulation.

[3]  W. Stevenson,et al.  Catheter Ablation in Patients With Multiple and Unstable Ventricular Tachycardias After Myocardial Infarction: Short Ablation Lines Guided by Reentry Circuit Isthmuses and Sinus Rhythm Mapping , 2001, Circulation.

[4]  Stephan Willems,et al.  Catheter ablation of stable ventricular tachycardia before defibrillator implantation in patients with coronary heart disease (VTACH): a multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[5]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  C. Begg,et al.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. , 1994, Biometrics.

[7]  J. Ruskin,et al.  Treatment of ventricular tachycardia by transcatheter radiofrequency ablation in patients with ischemic heart disease. , 1994, Circulation.

[8]  C. Wyndham,et al.  Effect of increased current, multiple pacing sites and number of extrastimuli on induction of ventricular tachycardia. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  A. Mügge,et al.  Usefulness of a limited linear ablation of post-myocardial infarction ventricular tachycardia using a standardized approach based on sinus rhythm mapping. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  F. Veglia,et al.  Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Electrical Storm in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in a Prospective Single-Center Study , 2008, Circulation.

[11]  H. Calkins,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation in patients with ventricular tachycardia. , 2000, Circulation.

[12]  Warren M. Jackman,et al.  Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Guided by Electroanatomic Mapping for Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction: The Multicenter Thermocool Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Trial , 2008, Circulation.

[13]  Hubert Cochet,et al.  Elimination of Local Abnormal Ventricular Activities: A New End Point for Substrate Modification in Patients With Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia , 2012, Circulation.

[14]  A. Hero,et al.  The value of defibrillator electrograms for recognition of clinical ventricular tachycardias and for pace mapping of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  D. Callans Can We Eliminate Noninducibility by Programmed Stimulation as an Endpoint for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients with Structural Heart Disease? , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[16]  Michele Tarsilla Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[17]  Frank Bogun,et al.  Isolated potentials during sinus rhythm and pace-mapping within scars as guides for ablation of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  F. Marchlinski,et al.  Incidence and predictors of mortality following ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. , 2010, Heart rhythm.

[19]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. , 1994, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[20]  Jeremy N Ruskin,et al.  Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[22]  Giuseppe Maccabelli,et al.  Late Potentials Abolition as an Additional Technique for Reduction of Arrhythmia Recurrence in Scar Related Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[23]  D. Lin,et al.  Noninvasive programmed ventricular stimulation early after ventricular tachycardia ablation to predict risk of late recurrence. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Sanghamitra Mohanty,et al.  Endo-epicardial homogenization of the scar versus limited substrate ablation for the treatment of electrical storms in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  A. Mügge,et al.  Substrate-modification using electroanatomical mapping in sinus rhythm to treat ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy , 2005, Zeitschrift für Kardiologie.

[26]  F. Morady,et al.  A prospective comparison of triple extrastimuli and left ventricular stimulation in studies of ventricular tachycardia induction. , 1984, Circulation.

[27]  C. Klersy,et al.  Incidence and significance of pleomorphism in patients with postmyocardial infarction ventricular tachycardia. Acute and long-term outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation. , 2004, European heart journal.

[28]  D. Moher,et al.  Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews , 1996, The Lancet.

[29]  Frank Bogun,et al.  Comparison of mapping criteria for hemodynamically tolerated, postinfarction ventricular tachycardia. , 2006, Heart rhythm.

[30]  B. Desjardins,et al.  Reasons for recurrent ventricular tachycardia after catheter ablation of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  J. Ruskin,et al.  Short-term results of substrate mapping and radiofrequency ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia using a saline-irrigated catheter. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.