Investigation of the influence of keloid-derived keratinocytes on fibroblast growth and proliferation in vitro.

Keloids are disfiguring, proliferative scars that represent a pathological response to cutaneous injury. The overabundant extracellular matrix formation, largely from collagen deposition, is characteristic of these lesions and has led to investigations into the role of the fibroblast in its pathogenesis. Curiously, the role of the epidermis in extracellular matrix collagen deposition of normal skin has been established, but a similar hypothesis in keloids has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of keloid epithelial keratinocytes on the growth and proliferation of normal fibroblasts in an in vitro serum-free co-culture system. A permeable membrane separated two chambers; the upper chamber contained a fully differentiated stratified epithelium derived from the skin of excised earlobe keloid specimens, whereas the lower chamber contained a monolayer of normal or keloid fibroblasts. Both cell types were nourished by serum-free medium from the lower chamber. Epithelial keratinocytes from five separate earlobe keloid specimens were investigated. Four sets of quadruplicates were performed for each specimen co-cultured with normal fibroblasts or keloid-derived fibroblasts. Controls consisted of (1) normal keratinocytes co-cultured with normal fibroblasts, and (2) fibroblasts grown in serum-free media in the absence of keratinocytes in the upper chamber. Fibroblasts were indirectly quantified by 3- (4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide colorimetric assay, with results confirmed by DNA content measurement, at days 1 and 5 after the co- culture initiation.Significantly, increased proliferation was seen in fibroblasts co-cultured with keloid keratinocytes, as compared with the normal keratinocyte controls at day 5 (analysis of variance, p < 0.001). These results strongly suggest that the overlying epidermal keratinocytes of the keloid may have an important, previously unappreciated role in keloid pathogenesis using paracrine or epithelial-mesenchymal signaling.

[1]  N. Fusenig,et al.  Keratinocyte growth regulation in fibroblast cocultures via a double paracrine mechanism. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[2]  M J Banda,et al.  Large induction of keratinocyte growth factor expression in the dermis during wound healing. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  K. Yamada,et al.  Evidence that beta1 integrins in keratinocyte cell-cell junctions are not in the ligand-occupied conformation. , 1997, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[4]  S. M. Alhady KELOIDS IN VARIOUS RACES A Review of 175 Cases , 1969, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  L. Taichman,et al.  A partial catalog of proteins secreted by epidermal keratinocytes in culture. , 1999, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[6]  H. Green,et al.  Seria cultivation of strains of human epidemal keratinocytes: the formation keratinizin colonies from single cell is , 1975, Cell.

[7]  E. Peacock,et al.  Biologic basis for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. , 1970 .

[8]  M. Hansen,et al.  Re-examination and further development of a precise and rapid dye method for measuring cell growth/cell kill. , 1989, Journal of immunological methods.

[9]  C. Ware,et al.  Rapid colorimetric assay for cell viability: application to the quantitation of cytotoxic and growth inhibitory lymphokines. , 1984, Journal of immunological methods.

[10]  M Kon,et al.  On the nature of hypertrophic scars and keloids: a review. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  E Bell,et al.  The reconstitution of living skin. , 1983, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[12]  S. Boyce Epidermis as a secretory tissue. , 1994, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[13]  L. Taichman,et al.  Epidermis as a secretory tissue: an in vitro tissue model to study keratinocyte secretion. , 1994, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[14]  N. Fusenig,et al.  Organotypic and epidermal-dermal co-cultures of normal human keratinocytes and dermal cells: Regulation of transforming growth factor α, β1 and β2 mRNA levels , 1994 .

[15]  S. Jee,et al.  Hydration, not silicone, modulates the effects of keratinocytes on fibroblasts. , 1995, The Journal of surgical research.

[16]  M. Longaker,et al.  Hypoxia upregulates VEGF production in keloid fibroblasts. , 1999, Annals of plastic surgery.

[17]  N. Fusenig,et al.  Mutual induction of growth factor gene expression by epidermal-dermal cell interaction , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  M. Longaker,et al.  Expression of transforming growth factor beta 1, 2, and 3 proteins in keloids. , 1999, Annals of plastic surgery.

[19]  J. Murray Scars and keloids. , 1993, Dermatologic clinics.

[20]  D. Willoughby,et al.  Apoptosis, necrosis, and proliferation: possible implications in the etiology of keloids. , 1996, The American journal of pathology.

[21]  T. Mosmann Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. , 1983, Journal of immunological methods.

[22]  A. J. Nemeth,et al.  Keloids and hypertrophic scars. , 1993, The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology.

[23]  T. Tuan,et al.  The molecular basis of keloid and hypertrophic scar formation. , 1998, Molecular medicine today.

[24]  M. M. Ghosh,et al.  A Comparison of Methodologies for the Preparation of Human Epidermal‐Dermal Composites , 1997, Annals of plastic surgery.

[25]  M. Robson,et al.  Effect of TGF-beta2 on proliferative scar fibroblast cell kinetics. , 1999, Annals of plastic surgery.

[26]  T. Kupper,et al.  The human burn wound as a primary source of interleukin-1 activity. , 1986, Surgery.

[27]  W. Garner,et al.  Epidermal Regulation of Dermal Fibroblast Activity , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.