How leader and follower prototypical and antitypical attributes influence ratings of transformational leadership in an extreme context

Leadership is a process where leaders enact certain behaviors to influence followers. Yet, each follower may view the leader’s enactment differently, owing to differences in disposition and context. Here we examine leadership as a property attributed by followers to their leader, influenced by both the leader and followers’ personal attributes and the situation in which leaders and followers interact. Guiding this study, we asked: how do followers’ affect (negative and positive traits), motivation (regulatory focus), and cognitions (identity) and their congruence with their leader’s corresponding attributes influence their ratings of transformational leadership? Participants operated in extreme situations where their lives were often at risk because of exposure to combat. Results based on a sample of 1587 US Army soldiers operating in 262 units show that when there is a higher congruence between leaders’ and followers’ positive affect, promotion focus, relational identity, and collective identity, follower ratings of transformational leadership are higher, whereas a higher level of incongruence between followers’ and leaders’ positive and negative affect predicted lower ratings of transformational leadership. These findings differed based on the soldiers’ time spent in deployment and the level of combat exposure they experienced.

[1]  Roseanne J. Foti,et al.  Implicit Leadership Theories, Implicit Followership Theories, and Dynamic Processing of Leadership Information , 2020, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior.

[2]  Mark J. Martinko,et al.  An Exploration of the Role of Subordinate Affect in Leader Evaluations , 2018, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Fadel K. Matta,et al.  Examining Follower Responses to Transformational Leadership from a Dynamic, Person–Environment Fit Perspective , 2017, Academy of Management Journal.

[4]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social identifications in organizational behavior , 2017 .

[5]  Roseanne J. Foti,et al.  Dynamic viewpoints on implicit leadership and followership theories : approaches, findings, and future directions. , 2017 .

[6]  F. Luthans,et al.  Psychological Capital: An Evidence-Based Positive Approach , 2017 .

[7]  Eean R. Crawford,et al.  Turning their Pain to Gain: Charismatic Leader Influence on Follower Stress Appraisal and Job Performance , 2016 .

[8]  Zhonglin Wen,et al.  Leader-follower congruence in loneliness, LMX and turnover intention , 2016 .

[9]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  “I Identify with Her,” “I Identify with Him”: Unpacking the Dynamics of Personal Identification in Organizations , 2016 .

[10]  Lindsay Y. Dhanani,et al.  Is a happy leader a good leader? A meta-analytic investigation of leader trait affect and leadership , 2015 .

[11]  Roseanne J. Foti,et al.  If You’re Not With Me You’re . . . ? Examining Prototypes and Cooperation in Leader–Follower Relationships , 2015 .

[12]  B. Schyns,et al.  Reconsidering the accuracy of follower leadership ratings , 2015 .

[13]  Roseanne J. Foti,et al.  Special issue: Dynamic viewpoints on Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories , 2014 .

[14]  B. Shamir,et al.  The Dual Effect of Transformational Leadership: Priming Relational and Collective Selves and Further Effects on Followers , 2013 .

[15]  S. Hannah,et al.  Leadership in the Profession of Arms , 2012 .

[16]  Mo Wang,et al.  Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchange , 2012 .

[17]  J. Bono,et al.  Impact of Rater Personality on Transformational and Transactional Leadership Ratings , 2012 .

[18]  Kai Sassenberg,et al.  Transformational-transactional leadership styles and followers’ regulatory focus: Fit reduces followers’ turnover intentions. , 2011 .

[19]  Sebastian Fuchs,et al.  The impact of manager and top management identification on the relationship between perceived organizational justice and change‐oriented behavior , 2011 .

[20]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  Person-Organization Value Congruence: How Transformational Leaders Influence Work Group Effectiveness , 2011 .

[21]  Jessica E. Dinh,et al.  Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: Applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership , 2010 .

[22]  J. K. Roberts,et al.  Explained Variance in Multilevel Models , 2010 .

[23]  Enno Siemsen,et al.  Common Method Bias in Regression Models With Linear, Quadratic, and Interaction Effects , 2010 .

[24]  R. Lord,et al.  Implicit effects of justice on self-identity. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  Angelo J. Kinicki,et al.  Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups , 2010 .

[26]  Eric D. Heggestad,et al.  Polynomial Regression with Response Surface Analysis: A Powerful Approach for Examining Moderation and Overcoming Limitations of Difference Scores , 2010 .

[27]  B. Avolio,et al.  A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts , 2009 .

[28]  J. Lyons,et al.  The effects of leadership style on stress outcomes , 2009 .

[29]  J. Edwards,et al.  The value of value congruence. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  H. Tseng.  COMMITMENT ? TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP AS A MEDIATOR , 2009 .

[31]  H. Tseng,et al.  Regulatory Focus, Transformational Leadership, Uncertainty towards Organizational Change, and Job Satisfaction: In a Taiwan's Cultural Setting , 2009 .

[32]  Stefano Livi,et al.  A social relations analysis of leadership , 2008 .

[33]  C. Frith.  Social cognition , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Ceo Transformational Leadership: The Role of Goal Importance Congruence in Top Management Teams , 2008 .

[35]  C. Hoge,et al.  Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems and barriers to care. , 2004, U.S. Army Medical Department journal.

[36]  B. Bass,et al.  The Bass handbook of leadership : theory, research, and managerial applications , 2008 .

[37]  Léo F. C. Bruno,et al.  LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 2008 .

[38]  Michael R. Mullen,et al.  Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit , 2008 .

[39]  R. Kark,et al.  Motivation to Lead, Motivation to Follow: The Role of the Self-Regulatory Focus in Leadership Processes , 2007 .

[40]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Relational Identity and Identification: Defining Ourselves Through Work Relationships , 2007 .

[41]  J. Bono,et al.  Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion , 2006 .

[42]  M. Wesson,et al.  Psychological collectivism: a measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[43]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  When organizational justice and the self-concept meet: Consequences for the organization and its members ☆ , 2006 .

[44]  William H. Bommer,et al.  Leading from Within: The Effects of Emotion Recognition and Personality on Transformational Leadership Behavior , 2005 .

[45]  Karen J. Jansen,et al.  Marching to the beat of a different drummer: Examining the impact of pacing congruence , 2005 .

[46]  A. Kristof-brown,et al.  CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS' FIT AT WORK: A META-ANALYSIS OF PERSON-JOB, PERSON-ORGANIZATION, PERSON-GROUP, AND PERSON-SUPERVISOR FIT , 2005 .

[47]  Douglas J. Brown,et al.  Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect , 2005 .

[48]  Robin Martin,et al.  Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  R. Davidson.  Affective neuroscience and psychophysiology: toward a synthesis. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[50]  E. Higgins,et al.  Transfer of value from fit. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  Gilad Chen,et al.  The two faces of transformational leadership: empowerment and dependency. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  Christian H. Jordan,et al.  Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  E. Kelloway,et al.  Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  J. Edwards.  Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. , 2002 .

[55]  Paul D. Bliese,et al.  Multilevel random coefficient modeling in organizational research: Examples using SAS and S-PLUS. , 2002 .

[56]  M. Platow,et al.  The Link between Leadership and Followership: How Affirming Social Identity Translates Vision into Action , 2001 .

[57]  M. Platow,et al.  A Social Identity Analysis of Leadership Endorsement: The Effects of Leader Ingroup Prototypicality and Distributive Intergroup Fairness , 2001 .

[58]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Regulatory Focus Theory: Implications for the Study of Emotions at Work , 2001 .

[59]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  A Social Identity Theory of Leadership , 2001 .

[60]  Katherine J. Klein,et al.  Predicting followers' preferences for charismatic leadership: the influence of follower values and personality , 2001 .

[61]  B. Avolio,et al.  Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. , 2000 .

[62]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box: Extending the cognitive revolution in leadership research , 2000 .

[63]  T. Judge,et al.  Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[64]  Brown,et al.  Understanding the Dynamics of Leadership: The Role of Follower Self-Concepts in the Leader/Follower Relationship. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[65]  J. Vaidya,et al.  The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence , 1999 .

[66]  N. Rothbard,et al.  Work and Family Stress and Well-Being: An Examination of Person-Environment Fit in the Work and Family Domains. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[67]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[68]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[69]  M. Popper,et al.  Correlates of Charismatic Leader Behavior in Military Units: Subordinates' Attitudes, Unit Characteristics, And Superiors' Appraisals of Leader Performance , 1998 .

[70]  Nancy G. Boyd,et al.  A developmental approach to the examination of friendship in leader-follower relationships , 1998 .

[71]  E. Higgins,et al.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[72]  M. Brewer,et al.  Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. , 1996 .

[73]  B. Bass.  Theory of transformational leadership redux , 1995 .

[74]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[75]  W. Mischel,et al.  A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. , 1995, Psychological review.

[76]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. , 1994 .

[77]  J. Edwards.  The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative , 1994 .

[78]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  On the Use of Polynomial Regression Equations As An Alternative to Difference Scores in Organizational Research , 1993 .

[79]  P. Salovey,et al.  The intelligence of emotional intelligence , 1993 .

[80]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[81]  M. Brewer.  The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[82]  B. Bass.  From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. , 1990 .

[83]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[84]  A. Aron,et al.  Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. , 1988 .

[85]  J. Russell,et al.  Leader prototypes and prototype-contingent consensus in leader behavior descriptions. , 1988 .

[86]  J. Dietch.  Anxiety Disorders and Phobias: A Cognitive Perspective , 1986 .

[87]  R. Lord.  Accuracy in behavioral measurement: An alternative definition based on raters' cognitive schema and signal detection theory. , 1985 .

[88]  J. S. Phillips.  The accuracy of leadership ratings: A cognitive categorization perspective☆ , 1984 .

[89]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social Cognition, from Brains to Culture , 1984 .

[90]  Arthur G. Jago,et al.  Leadership: Perspectives in Theory and Research , 1982 .