Optimal Robot Localization in Trees

The problem of localization, that is, of a robot finding its position on a map, is an important task for autonomous mobile robots. It has applications in numerous areas of robotics ranging from aerial photography to autonomous vehicle exploration. In this paper we present a new strategy LPS (Localize-by-Placement-Separation) for a robot to find its position on a map, where the map is represented as a geometric tree of bounded degree. Our strategy exploits to a high degree the self-similarities that may occur in the environment. We use the framework of competitive analysis to analyze the performance of our strategy. In particular, we show that the distance traveled by the robot is at most O (√n) times longer than the shortest possible route to localize the robot, where n is the number of vertices of the tree. This is a significant improvement over the best known previous bound of O(n2/3). Moreover, since there is a lower bound of Ω(√n), our strategy is optimal up to a constant factor. Using the same approach we can also show that the problem of searching for a target in a geometric tree, where the robot is given a map of the tree and the location of the target but does not know its own position, can be solved by a strategy with a competitive ratio of O(√n), which is again optimal up to a constant factor. 2001 Elsevier Science

[1]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  The robot localization problem in two dimensions , 1992, SODA '92.

[2]  Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates,et al.  Searching in the Plane , 1993, Inf. Comput..

[3]  Mona Singh,et al.  Piecemeal Learning of an Unknown Environment , 1993, COLT.

[4]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  Computational ground and airborne localization over rough terrain , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[5]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The localization problem for mobile robots , 1994, Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[6]  Gregory Dudek,et al.  Localizing a robot with minimum travel , 1995, SODA '95.

[7]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Amortized efficiency of list update and paging rules , 1985, CACM.

[8]  Avrim Blum,et al.  An on-line algorithm for improving performance in navigation , 1993, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE 34th Annual Foundations of Computer Science.

[9]  Mihalis Yannakakis,et al.  Shortest Paths Without a Map , 1989, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[10]  Amos Fiat,et al.  Online Navigation in a Room , 1992, J. Algorithms.

[11]  Baruch Schieber,et al.  Navigating in Unfamiliar Geometric Terrain , 1997, SIAM J. Comput..

[12]  Bala Kalyanasundaram,et al.  A Competitive Analysis of Algorithms for Searching Unknown Scenes , 1993, Comput. Geom..

[13]  Kurt Mehlhorn,et al.  LEDA: a platform for combinatorial and geometric computing , 1997, CACM.

[14]  C. N. Shen,et al.  Autonomous navigation to provide long-distance surface traverses for Mars Rover Sample Return Mission , 1989, Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control 1989.

[15]  Piotr Berman,et al.  On-line Searching and Navigation , 1996, Online Algorithms.