Mastering Yield Stress Evolution and Formwork Friction for Smart Dynamic Casting

The construction industry is a slow adopter of new technologies and materials. However, interdisciplinary research efforts in digital fabrication methods with concrete aim to make a real impact on the way we build by showing faster production, higher quality and enlarged freedom of design. In this paper, the potential and constraints of a specific digital slip-forming process, smart dynamic casting (SDC), are investigated with a material-focused approach in the complex task of producing thin folded structures. Firstly, the workability and the strength evolution of different material compositions are studied to achieve the constant processing rate for SDC. Secondly, friction between the formwork walls and the concrete, a key aspect in slip-casting, is studied with a simplified experimental setup to identify if any of these mixes would provide an advantage for processing. Finally, a theoretical framework is constructed to link the material properties, the process conditions and the designed geometry. This framework introduces the ‘SDC number’ as a simplified approach to formulate the process window, the suitable conditions for slip-forming. The experimental results prove the assumption of the model that friction is proportional to yield stress for all base compositions and acceleration methods regardless of the filling history. The results are evaluated in the context of the narrow process window of thin folded structures as well as the wider process window of columns. The necessity of consistent strength evolution is underlined for narrow windows. Further, friction is shown to be the highest initially, thus with both narrow and wide process windows, after a successful start-up the continuation of slipping is less prone to failure. The proposed theoretical model could provide material and geometry-specific slipping strategy for start time and slipping rate during production.

[1]  Andrew Charleson,et al.  Structure as Architecture: A Source Book for Architects and Structural Engineers , 2005 .

[2]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  Digital Concrete: Opportunities and Challenges , 2016 .

[3]  Robert J. Flatt,et al.  Relating early hydration, specific surface and flow loss of cement pastes , 2019, Materials and Structures.

[4]  Fabio Gramazio,et al.  Adaptive Control System for Smart Dynamic Casting , 2018 .

[5]  Ena Lloret Fritschi Smart Dynamic Casting - A digital fabrication method for non-standard concrete structures , 2016 .

[6]  Kazuo Yamada,et al.  RHEOLOGY AND EARLY AGE PROPERTIES OF CEMENT SYSTEMS , 2008 .

[7]  T. T. Le,et al.  Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete , 2012 .

[8]  Richard A. Buswell,et al.  3D printing using concrete extrusion: A roadmap for research , 2018, Cement and Concrete Research.

[9]  Ammar Yahia,et al.  Measuring Rheological Properties of Cement Pastes: Most common Techniques, Procedures and Challenges , 2017 .

[10]  Heino Engel,et al.  Tragsysteme = Structure systems , 1968 .

[11]  Lex Reiter,et al.  The role of early age structural build-up in digital fabrication with concrete , 2018, Cement and Concrete Research.

[12]  Fabio Gramazio,et al.  Processing of Set on Demand Solutions for Digital Fabrication in Architecture , 2019 .

[13]  Fabio Gramazio,et al.  Challenges of Real-Scale Production with Smart Dynamic Casting , 2018, RILEM Bookseries.

[14]  Emmanuel Denarié,et al.  Next generation UHPFRC for sustainable structural applications , 2018 .

[15]  Florian Müller,et al.  Potential benefits of digital fabrication for complex structures: Environmental assessment of a robotically fabricated concrete wall , 2017 .

[16]  Patrick Juilland,et al.  Early hydration of cementitious systems , 2009 .

[17]  Robert J. Flatt,et al.  Yield Stress During Setting of Cement Pastes From Penetration Tests , 2009 .

[18]  GramazioFabio,et al.  Complex concrete structures , 2015 .

[19]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  Rheology of fresh concrete: from measurements to predictions of casting processes , 2007 .

[20]  Fabio Gramazio,et al.  Revisiting Folded Forms with Digital Fabrication , 2019 .

[21]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  “Fifty-cent rheometer” for yield stress measurements: From slump to spreading flow , 2005 .

[22]  Falk K. Wittel,et al.  Evolution of strength and failure of SCC during early hydration , 2016, 1609.02293.

[23]  Sara Mantellato,et al.  Flow Loss in Superplasticized Cement Pastes , 2017 .

[24]  Fabio Gramazio,et al.  Adapting Smart Dynamic Casting to Thin Folded Geometries , 2018 .

[25]  Freek Bos,et al.  Early age mechanical behaviour of 3D printed concrete: Numerical modelling and experimental testing , 2018 .

[26]  Lex Reiter,et al.  Putting Concrete to Sleep and Waking It Up with Chemical Admixtures , 2015 .

[27]  Lex Reiter,et al.  Setting on demand for digital concrete – Principles, measurements, chemistry, validation , 2020 .

[28]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  Rheological requirements for printable concretes , 2018, Cement and Concrete Research.

[29]  Fabio Gramazio,et al.  Complex concrete structures: Merging existing casting techniques with digital fabrication , 2015, Comput. Aided Des..

[30]  Bernhard Middendorf,et al.  Microstructural investigations on the skinning of ultra-high performance concrete , 2015 .

[31]  Fabio Gramazio,et al.  Smart Dynamic Casting: Slipforming with Flexible Formwork - Inline Measurement and Control , 2017 .