Discourse Representation in the Two Cerebral Hemispheres

Readers construct at least two interrelated representations when they comprehend a text: (a) a propositional representation containing the individual ideas that are derived from each sentence and the relations among them and (b) a discourse model, a representation of the context or situation to which the text refers. We used a paradigm called item priming in recognition to examine how these representations are stored in the cerebral hemispheres. In Experiment 1, the priming paradigm was used in combination with a lateralized visual field (VF) procedure. We found evidence that readers' representations were structured according to propositional relations, but only in the left hemisphere. Item recognition was facilitated when a concept was preceded by another concept from the same proposition when targets were presented to the left, but not to the right, hemisphere. We found priming in both hemispheres, however, when targets were context-appropriate senses of ambiguous words or topics of passages. In Experiment 2, we replicated the priming effects in three callosotomy patients. We argue that the distinction between a propositional representation and a discourse model is important with respect to how discourse is represented in the brain. The propositional representation appears to reside in the left hemisphere, whereas aspects of the discourse model appear to be represented in both hemispheres.

[1]  R. Sperry,et al.  Language after section of the cerebral commissures. , 1967, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  H. Kuypers,et al.  Cerebral control of contralateral and ipsilateral arm, hand and finger movements in the split-brain rhesus monkey. , 1973, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The representation of meaning in memory , 1974 .

[4]  H. Gardner,et al.  The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. , 1977, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[6]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Priming in item recognition: Evidence for the propositional structure of sentences , 1978 .

[7]  H. Gardner,et al.  Sensitivity to Emotional Expressions and Situations in Organic Patients , 1980, Cortex.

[8]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Priming in item recognition: The organization of propositions in memory for text , 1980 .

[9]  H. Gardner,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials , 1981, Brain and Language.

[10]  Howard Gardner,et al.  The Contribution of the Right Hemisphere to the Organization of Paragraphs , 1983, Cortex.

[11]  C. Mateer,et al.  Right hemisphere appreciation of prosodic and linguistic indications of implicit attitude , 1985, Brain and Language.

[12]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Comprehension of humorous and nonhumorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[13]  H. Gardner,et al.  Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Language.

[14]  Roger Wales,et al.  An investigation of the ability to process inferences in language following right hemisphere brain damage , 1986, Brain and Language.

[15]  R. Gur,et al.  Contralateral and ipsilateral control of fingers following callosotomy , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  D. Lancker,et al.  Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients , 1987, Brain and Language.

[17]  Right hemisphere language: insights into normal language mechanisms? , 1988, Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease.

[18]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Y. Joanette,et al.  Right Hemisphere and Verbal Communication , 1989 .

[20]  Kathleen Baynes,et al.  Language and Reading in the Right Hemisphere: Highways or Byways of the Brain? , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  M. Hough.  Narrative comprehension in adults with right and left hemisphere brain-damage: Theme organization , 1990, Brain and Language.

[22]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[23]  C. Tompkins,et al.  Redundancy enhances emotional inferencing by right- and left-hemisphere-damaged adults. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[24]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension : a construction-integration model , 1991 .

[25]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Pronoun resolution and discourse models. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Sensitivity to conversational deviance in right-hemisphere-damaged patients , 1992, Brain and Language.

[27]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992, Psychological review.

[28]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Reading with a limited lexicon in the right hemisphere of a callosotomy patient , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  M. Beeman.  Semantic Processing in the Right Hemisphere May Contribute to Drawing Inferences from Discourse , 1993, Brain and Language.

[30]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994, Psychological review.

[31]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Subcortical transfer of higher order information: More illusory than real? , 1995 .

[32]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The emergence of the capacity to name left visual field stimuli in a callosotomy patient: Implications for functional plasticity , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Debra L. Long,et al.  Individual differences in readers' sentence- and text-level representations , 1997 .

[34]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Modular organization of cognitive systems masked by interhemispheric integration. , 1998, Science.

[35]  K. Baynes,et al.  The visual lexicon: Its access and organization in commissurotomy patients. , 1998 .

[36]  Mark Beeman,et al.  Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. , 1998 .

[37]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Memory-based language processing: psycholinguistic research in the 1990s. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  M. Faust,et al.  Levels of Sentence Constraint and Lexical Decision in the Two Hemispheres , 1998, Brain and Language.

[39]  E. Kaan.  Left hemisphere discourse? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Hemispheric differences in semantic-relatedness judgments , 2003, Cognition.