Regulation of the H4 tail binding and folding landscapes via Lys-16 acetylation

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDP) are a broad class of proteins with relatively flat energy landscapes showing a high level of functional promiscuity, which are frequently regulated through posttranslational covalent modifications. Histone tails, which are the terminal segments of the histone proteins, are prominent IDPs that are implicated in a variety of signaling processes, which control chromatin organization and dynamics. Although a large body of work has been done on elucidating the roles of posttranslational modifications in functional regulation of IDPs, molecular mechanisms behind the observed behaviors are not fully understood. Using extensive atomistic molecular dynamics simulations, we found in this work that H4 tail mono-acetylation at LYS-16, which is a key covalent modification, induces a significant reorganization of the tail’s conformational landscape, inducing partial ordering and enhancing the propensity for alpha-helical segments. Furthermore, our calculations of the potentials of mean force between the H4 tail and a DNA fragment indicate that contrary to the expectations based on simple electrostatic reasoning, the Lys-16 mono-acetylated H4 tail binds to DNA stronger than the unacetylated protein. Based on these results, we propose a molecular mechanism for the way Lys-16 acetylation might lead to experimentally observed disruption of compact chromatin fibers.

[1]  Alan P. Wolffe,et al.  A positive role for histone acetylation in transcription factor access to nucleosomal DNA , 1993, Cell.

[2]  G. Hummer,et al.  Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix-coil transition of polypeptides. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[3]  H Jane Dyson,et al.  Expanding the proteome: disordered and alternatively folded proteins , 2011, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[4]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The physics and bioinformatics of binding and folding—an energy landscape perspective , 2003, Biopolymers.

[5]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of Protein Folding This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Folding and Binding Edited Basic Concepts Perfect Funnel Landscapes and Common Features of Folding Mechanisms , 2022 .

[6]  A. Fersht.  Structure and mechanism in protein science , 1998 .

[7]  Gennady M Verkhivker,et al.  Energy landscape theory, funnels, specificity, and optimal criterion of biomolecular binding. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[8]  Controlled DNA compaction within chromatin: The tail-bridging effect , 2005, q-bio/0503007.

[9]  W. Gu,et al.  Acetylation of p53 augments its site-specific DNA binding both in vitro and in vivo. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  M. Karplus,et al.  Dynamics of folded proteins , 1977, Nature.

[11]  Garegin A Papoian,et al.  Deconstructing the native state: energy landscapes, function, and dynamics of globular proteins. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[12]  T. H. Dunning.  Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen , 1989 .

[13]  P. Kollman,et al.  Settle: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models , 1992 .

[14]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.

[15]  T. Cheatham,et al.  Determination of Alkali and Halide Monovalent Ion Parameters for Use in Explicitly Solvated Biomolecular Simulations , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[16]  Peter G. Wolynes,et al.  Energy Landscape Analysis of Protein Dimers , 2004 .

[17]  Andrew J. Bannister,et al.  Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications , 2011, Cell Research.

[18]  Diego U Ferreiro,et al.  Experimental snapshots of a protein-DNA binding landscape , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  Fuzziness: linking regulation to protein dynamics. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.

[20]  D Thirumalai,et al.  The nature of folded states of globular proteins , 1992, Biopolymers.

[21]  G. Papoian.  Proteins with weakly funneled energy landscapes challenge the classical structure–function paradigm , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Antoine M. van Oijen,et al.  A single-molecule characterization of p53 search on DNA , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  J. Ausió,et al.  Acetylation Increases the α-Helical Content of the Histone Tails of the Nucleosome* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  C. Allis,et al.  The language of covalent histone modifications , 2000, Nature.

[25]  J. Hansen,et al.  Conformational dynamics of the chromatin fiber in solution: determinants, mechanisms, and functions. , 2002, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[26]  Kevin J. McHale,et al.  Single-Molecule Fluorescence Experiments Determine Protein Folding Transition Path Times , 2012, Science.

[27]  Andrey G. Cherstvy.  Positively charged residues in DNA-binding domains of structural proteins follow sequence-specific positions of DNA phosphate groups. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[28]  M. Grunstein,et al.  Functions of site-specific histone acetylation and deacetylation. , 2007, Annual review of biochemistry.

[29]  Nathalie Brun,et al.  Chromatin compaction at the mononucleosome level. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[30]  R. S. Spolar,et al.  Coupling of local folding to site-specific binding of proteins to DNA. , 1994, Science.

[31]  J. Widom,et al.  Effects of histone acetylation on the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  Giorgio Parisi,et al.  Order parameter for spin-glasses , 1983 .

[33]  P. Tompa,et al.  Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[34]  M. Pazin,et al.  Histone H4-K16 Acetylation Controls Chromatin Structure and Protein Interactions , 2006, Science.

[35]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Fly-casting in protein-DNA binding: frustration between protein folding and electrostatics facilitates target recognition. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[36]  T. Kouzarides.  Chromatin Modifications and Their Function , 2007, Cell.

[37]  J. Marko,et al.  How do site-specific DNA-binding proteins find their targets? , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  J. Langowski,et al.  Structural variability of nucleosomes detected by single-pair Förster resonance energy transfer: histone acetylation, sequence variation, and salt effects. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[39]  J. Šponer,et al.  Refinement of the AMBER Force Field for Nucleic Acids: Improving the Description of α/γ Conformers , 2007 .

[40]  Daniel Svozil,et al.  Refinement of the AMBER force field for nucleic acids: improving the description of alpha/gamma conformers. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[41]  A. Sigalov.  Uncoupled binding and folding of immune signaling-related intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[42]  B Honig,et al.  On the magnitude of the electrostatic contribution to ligand-DNA interactions. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  J. Widom,et al.  Effects of Histone Tail Domains on the Rate of Transcriptional Elongation through a Nucleosome , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[44]  N. Korolev,et al.  The effects of histone H4 tail acetylations on cation-induced chromatin folding and self-association , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[45]  A. Fersht,et al.  Acetylation of lysine 120 of p53 endows DNA-binding specificity at effective physiological salt concentration , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  T. Richmond,et al.  Chromatin fiber folding: requirement for the histone H4 N-terminal tail. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  A. Dunker,et al.  Understanding protein non-folding. , 2010, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[48]  Alan M. Ferrenberg,et al.  Optimized Monte Carlo data analysis. , 1989, Physical Review Letters.

[49]  Alexey Savelyev,et al.  Counterion atmosphere and hydration patterns near a nucleosome core particle. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[50]  Davit A Potoyan,et al.  Energy landscape analyses of disordered histone tails reveal special organization of their conformational dynamics. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[51]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: the fly-casting mechanism. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  A. Becke.  A New Mixing of Hartree-Fock and Local Density-Functional Theories , 1993 .

[53]  R. Joseph,et al.  T-cell signaling regulated by the Tec family kinase, Itk. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[54]  T. Richmond,et al.  Solvent mediated interactions in the structure of the nucleosome core particle at 1.9 a resolution. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[55]  R. Ghosh,et al.  Chromatin higher-order structure and dynamics. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[56]  J. Banères,et al.  The N tails of histones H3 and H4 adopt a highly structured conformation in the nucleosome. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[57]  D. Angelov,et al.  Preferential interaction of the core histone tail domains with linker DNA , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.