Social capital selection framework of public-private partnership project of electrochemical storage power station under linguistic environment

Abstract The social capital selection is one of the most important issues in public-private partnership project of electrochemical storage power station. However, two problems reducing the decision-making rationality and accuracy exist in the present multi-criteria decision analysis. First, the existing evaluation index system does not can reflect the technological characteristics of electrochemical storage power station; second, some information distortion and loss are caused by the uncertainty in the evaluation values and the criteria weights. In order to overcome these deficiencies, the innovations of this paper are as follows: ①this paper built a social capital selection evaluation index system specifically targeted at electrochemical storage power station, the results of social capital selection are more in line with the actual needs of power station construction and operation; ② trapezoidal interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy number as the mathematics symbol of linguistic terms are used to established a evaluation model, which can balance the convenience of opinion expression and the accuracy of evaluation value; ③ the maximizing deviations principle was used to handle the interval weights under the linguistic environment, it not only allowed the experts to express subjective weights as possible as they can, but also realized objective weights’ information mining by using the deviations of evaluation data. The aforementioned innovations together constitute a social capital selection framework of electrochemical storage power station. Finally, the effectiveness of decision framework was verified based on a case study of China.

[1]  Peide Liu,et al.  The multi-attribute group decision-making method based on the interval grey uncertain linguistic generalized hybrid averaging operator , 2014, Neural Computing and Applications.

[2]  Tianyu Tang,et al.  Nanostructured Anode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries: Progress, Challenge and Perspective , 2016 .

[3]  Xiaohong Chen,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy information measures and their applications in multi-criteria decision making , 2016, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[4]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations , 2004, Inf. Sci..

[5]  L. A. ZADEH,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - I , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[6]  Chung-Li Tseng,et al.  Managing Project Performance Risks under Uncertainty: Using a Dynamic Capital Structure Approach in Infrastructure Project Financing , 2017 .

[7]  Xueqing Zhang,et al.  Failure Path Analysis with Respect to Private Sector Partners in Transportation Public-Private Partnerships , 2016 .

[8]  Chien-Jung Chen,et al.  Developing a systematic approach to evaluate and predict building service life , 2017 .

[9]  Graeme Bowles,et al.  Public–private partnerships and contract negotiations: an empirical study , 2004 .

[10]  Ian D Williams,et al.  Public perception of odour and environmental pollution attributed to MSW treatment and disposal facilities: a case study. , 2013, Waste management.

[11]  Xueqing Zhang,et al.  CONCESSIONAIRE SELECTION: METHODS AND CRITERIA , 2004 .

[12]  Vipul Jain,et al.  Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS: a case study in the Indian automotive industry , 2018, Neural Computing and Applications.

[13]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[14]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Sidong Xian,et al.  Fuzzy linguistic induced OWA Minkowski distance operator and its application in group decision making , 2014, Pattern Analysis and Applications.

[16]  Risks in PPP Water Projects in China: Perspective of Local Governments , 2017 .

[17]  Adel Azar,et al.  Assessing and understanding the key risks in a PPP power station projects , 2013 .

[18]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  N. Vajdic,et al.  Use of key performance indicators for PPP transport projects to meet stakeholders’ performance objectives , 2013 .

[20]  Heap-Yih Chong,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Firms’ Willingness to Participate in Infrastructure PPP Projects , 2018 .

[21]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  Models for Green Supplier Selection in Green Supply Chain Management With Pythagorean 2-Tuple Linguistic Information , 2018, IEEE Access.

[22]  Li De-qing Method for ranking interval numbers based on possibility degree , 2008 .

[23]  Champika Lasanthi Liyanage,et al.  Measuring Success of PPP Transport Projects: A Cross-Case Analysis of Toll Roads , 2015 .

[24]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information , 2011, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[25]  Xiaohong Chen,et al.  Interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy set and its application in multi-criteria decision making , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[26]  Mohammadreza Bemanian,et al.  Increasing VFM in PPP power station projects – Case study: Rudeshur gas turbine power station , 2009 .

[27]  Vicenç Torra,et al.  On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[28]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems Made Simple , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[29]  İhsan Kaya,et al.  Prioritization of renewable energy alternatives by using an integrated fuzzy MCDM model: A real case application for Turkey , 2017 .