Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Optimization Approaches for Aircraft Conceptual D esign
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Sobieszczanski Jaroslaw,et al. Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS) , 1998 .
[2] John E. Dennis,et al. On Alternative Problem Formulations for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization , 1992 .
[3] Srinivas Kodiyalam,et al. Initial Results of an MDO Method Evaluation Study , 1998 .
[4] Yuan Charles,et al. Evaluation of Methods for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO), Part II , 2000 .
[5] Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al. OPTIMIZATION OF COUPLED SYSTEMS: A CRITICAL OVERVIEW OF APPROACHES , 1994 .
[6] Christina Bloebaum,et al. A COMPARISON OF SOLUTION STRATEGIES FOR SIMULATION-BASED MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1998 .
[7] Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: An Emerging New Engineering Discipline , 1995 .
[8] S. Chen,et al. EVALUATION OF THREE DECOMPOSITION MDO ALGORITHMS , 2002 .
[9] R. Haftka,et al. On options for interdisciplinary analysis and design optimization , 1992 .
[10] Jaroslaw Sobieszczanskisobieski,et al. On the sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems , 1988 .
[11] Ilan Kroo,et al. Implementation and Performance Issues in Collaborative Optimization , 1996 .
[12] John E. Dennis,et al. Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization , 1994, SIAM J. Optim..
[13] John E. Renaud,et al. Response surface based, concurrent subspace optimization for multidisciplinary system design , 1996 .