Evaluation of MOPITT version 7 joint TIR-NIR XCO retrievals with TCCON

Abstract. Observations of carbon monoxide (CO) from the Measurements Of Pollution In The Troposphere (MOPITT) instrument onboard the Terra spacecraft were expected to have an accuracy of 10 % prior to launch in 1999. Here we evaluate MOPITT version 7 joint TIR-NIR (V7J) accuracy and precision, and suggest ways to further improve the accuracy of the observations. We take five steps involving filtering or bias corrections to reduce scatter and bias in the data relative to other MOPITT soundings, and ground based measurements. 1) We apply a preliminary filtering scheme in which measurements over snow and ice are removed. 2) We find a systematic pairwise bias among the four MOPITT along-track detectors (pixels) on the order of 3–4 ppb with a small temporal trend, which we remove on a global scale using a temporally trended bias correction. 3) Using a small region approximation (SRA) a new filtering scheme is developed and applied based on additional quality indicators such as signal-to-noise. After applying these new filters, the root mean squared error computed using the local median from the SRA over 16 years of global observations decreases from 3.84 ppb to 2.55 ppb. 4) We also use the SRA to find variability in MOPITT retrieval anomalies that relates to retrieval parameters. We apply a bias correction to one parameter from this analysis. 5) After applying the previous bias corrections and filtering, we compare the MOPITT results with the GGG2014 ground-based Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) observations to obtain an overall global bias correction. These comparisons show that MOPITT V7J is biased high by about 6–8 %, which is similar to past studies using independent validation datasets on V6J. When using TCCON spectrometric column retrievals without the standard airmass correction or scaling to aircraft (WMO scale), the ground and satellite based observations overall agree to better than 0.5 %. GEOS-Chem data assimilations are used to estimate the influence of filtering and scaling to TCCON on global CO, and tend to pull concentrations away from the prior, and closer to the truth. We conclude with suggestions for further improving the MOPITT data products.

[1]  Annmarie Eldering,et al.  How bias correction goes wrong: measurement of XCO2 affected by erroneous surface pressure estimates , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[2]  H. Worden,et al.  Radiance-based retrieval bias mitigation for the MOPITT instrument: the version 8 product , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[3]  Haili Hu,et al.  Mapping carbon monoxide pollution from space down to city scales with daily global coverage , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[4]  David Crisp,et al.  Improved retrievals of carbon dioxide from Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 with the version 8 ACOS algorithm , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[5]  Franz Schreier,et al.  Validation of Carbon Monoxide Total Column Retrievals from SCIAMACHY Observations with NDACC/TCCON Ground-Based Measurements , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[6]  John Robinson,et al.  The Total Carbon Column Observing Network site description for Lauder, New Zealand , 2017 .

[7]  Yukio Yoshida,et al.  TCCON Philippines: First Measurement Results, Satellite Data and Model Comparisons in Southeast Asia , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[8]  C. Sweeney,et al.  A climate-scale satellite record for carbon monoxide: the MOPITT Version 7 product , 2017 .

[9]  D. Wunch,et al.  Emissions and topographic effects on column CO2 ( XCO2 ) variations, with a focus on the Southern California Megacity , 2017 .

[10]  C. Crevoisier,et al.  Mean age of stratospheric air derived from AirCore observations , 2017 .

[11]  Merritt N. Deeter,et al.  A 15-year record of CO emissions constrained by MOPITT CO observations , 2016 .

[12]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  Global tropospheric hydroxyl distribution, budget and reactivity , 2016 .

[13]  C. Sweeney,et al.  AirCore-HR: a high-resolution column sampling to enhance the vertical description of CH 4 and CO 2 , 2016 .

[14]  E. Mahieu,et al.  Validation of MOPITT carbon monoxide using ground-based Fourier transform infrared spectrometer data from NDACC , 2016 .

[15]  E. Mahieu,et al.  Seasonal variability of surface and column carbon monoxide over the megacity Paris, high-altitude Jungfraujoch and Southern Hemispheric Wollongong stations , 2016 .

[16]  David Crisp,et al.  Comparisons of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) X CO 2 measurements with TCCON , 2016 .

[17]  M. Deeter,et al.  Validation and analysis of MOPITT CO observations of the Amazon Basin , 2016 .

[18]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Bias corrections of GOSAT SWIR XCO2 and XCH4 with TCCON data and their evaluation using aircraft measurement data , 2016 .

[19]  Pauli Heikkinen,et al.  Fourier transform spectrometer measurements of column CO 2 at Sodankylä, Finland , 2016 .

[20]  D. Wunch,et al.  Improved retrieval of gas abundances from near-infrared solar FTIR spectra measured at the Karlsruhe TCCON station , 2016 .

[21]  H. Worden,et al.  Information content of MOPITT CO profile retrievals: Temporal and geographical variability , 2015 .

[22]  N. Pankratova,et al.  Comparison results of satellite and ground-based spectroscopic measurements of CO, CH4, and CO2 total contents , 2015 .

[23]  Brian J. Connor,et al.  GFIT2: an experimental algorithm for vertical profile retrieval from near-IR spectra , 2015 .

[24]  V. Natraj,et al.  Accounting for aerosol scattering in the CLARS retrieval of column averaged CO2 mixing ratios , 2015 .

[25]  John Robinson,et al.  Consistent evaluation of ACOS-GOSAT, BESD-SCIAMACHY, CarbonTracker, and MACC through comparisons to TCCON , 2015 .

[26]  Zhe Jiang,et al.  Sensitivity of top-down CO source estimates to the modeled vertical structure in atmospheric CO , 2015 .

[27]  C. Sweeney,et al.  The MOPITT Version 6 product: algorithm enhancements and validation , 2014 .

[28]  D. Wunch,et al.  A method for colocating satellite X CO 2 data to ground-based data and its application to ACOS-GOSAT and TCCON , 2014 .

[29]  Jay R. Herman,et al.  Multiscale observations of CO2, 13CO2, and pollutants at Four Corners for emission verification and attribution , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  David D. Nelson,et al.  Evaluation of the airborne quantum cascade laser spectrometer (QCLS) measurements of the carbon and greenhouse gas suite – CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 O, and CO – during the CalNex and HIPPO campaigns , 2013 .

[31]  Christopher W. O'Dell,et al.  Semi-autonomous sounding selection for OCO-2 , 2013 .

[32]  Dylan B. A. Jones,et al.  Impact of model errors in convective transport on CO source estimates inferred from MOPITT CO retrievals , 2013 .

[33]  J. Lamarque,et al.  CAM-chem: description and evaluation of interactive atmospheric chemistry in the Community Earth System Model , 2012 .

[34]  J. Randerson,et al.  Daily and 3‐hourly variability in global fire emissions and consequences for atmospheric model predictions of carbon monoxide , 2011 .

[35]  Rebecca Castano,et al.  A method for evaluating bias in global measurements of CO 2 total columns from space , 2011 .

[36]  Shamil Maksyutov,et al.  TransCom model simulations of CH4 and related species: linking transport, surface flux and chemical loss with CH4 variability in the troposphere and lower stratosphere , 2011 .

[37]  Justus Notholt,et al.  The Total Carbon Column Observing Network , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[38]  Colm Sweeney,et al.  AirCore: An Innovative Atmospheric Sampling System , 2010 .

[39]  James B. Abshire,et al.  Calibration of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network using aircraft profile data , 2010 .

[40]  Merritt N. Deeter,et al.  The MOPITT version 4 CO product: Algorithm enhancements, validation, and long‐term stability , 2010 .

[41]  F. Nichitiu,et al.  A review of 9-year performance and operation of the MOPITT instrument , 2010 .

[42]  M. Buchwitz,et al.  Global Estimates of CO Sources with High Resolution by Adjoint Inversion of Multiple Satellite Datasets (MOPITT, AIRS, SCIAMACHY, TES) , 2009 .

[43]  G. Carmichael,et al.  Asian emissions in 2006 for the NASA INTEX-B mission , 2009 .

[44]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Orbiting Carbon Observatory: Inverse method and prospective error analysis , 2008 .

[45]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[46]  Margarita López Martínez,et al.  Unified equations for the slope, intercept, and standard errors of the best straight line , 2004 .

[47]  Jennifer A. Logan,et al.  An assessment of biofuel use and burning of agricultural waste in the developing world , 2003 .

[48]  P. M. Lang,et al.  Reanalysis of tropospheric CO trends: Effects of the 1997–1998 wildfires , 2003 .

[49]  Clive D Rodgers,et al.  Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[50]  B. Connor,et al.  Intercomparison of remote sounding instruments , 1999 .

[51]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1998 .

[52]  D. Gatz,et al.  The standard error of a weighted mean concentration—I. Bootstrapping vs other methods , 1995 .

[53]  C. Rodgers.  Characterization and Error Analysis of Profiles Retrieved From Remote Sounding Measurements , 1990 .

[54]  B. Efron,et al.  A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and , 1983 .

[55]  M. Deeter.  MOPITT ( Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere ) Version 5 Product User ' s Guide , 2011 .

[56]  J. Overpeck,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[57]  Eric Delhez,et al.  A spline interpolation technique that preserves mass budgets , 2003, Appl. Math. Lett..

[58]  M. Buchwitz,et al.  Initial validation of ENVISAT/SCIAMACHY columnar CO by FTIR profile retrievals at the Ground-Truthing Station Zugspitze , 2005 .