A glossary of theories for understanding policymaking

Public health practitioners and researchers often seek to influence public policies in order to improve population health and/or reduce health inequalities. However, these efforts frequently appear to be uninformed by the many empirically-based theories about policymaking that have been developed within political science. This glossary provides a brief overview of some of the most popular of these theories, describing how each: frames the policymaking process; portrays the relationships and influence of specific policy actors; and depicts the potential for policy change (or inertia). Examples of their application to public health are provided to help improve understanding of the material presented. Throughout the article, the implications of the different theories for public health researchers and advocates seeking to inform policy decisions are emphasised. The glossary aims to provide an accessible overview to key theories about policy and decision-making, with a view to supporting public health efforts to achieve healthier public policies.

[1]  農林水産奨励会農林水産政策情報センター,et al.  The green book : appraisal and evaluation in central government , 2003 .

[2]  D. Moynihan.  Normative and Instrumental Perspectives on Public Participation , 2003 .

[3]  H. Davies,et al.  What works to promote evidence-based practice? A cross-sector review , 2005 .

[4]  Peter John,et al.  Agendas and Instability in American Politics , 2013 .

[5]  T. McDonald.  The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences , 1996 .

[6]  A. Grant Jordan,et al.  Iron Triangles, Woolly Corporatism and Elastic Nets: Images of the Policy Process , 1981, Journal of Public Policy.

[7]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[8]  A. Kay.  A Critique of the Use of Path Dependency in Policy Studies , 2005 .

[9]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[10]  D. Hunter,et al.  The Challenge of Joined-Up Government in Tackling Health Inequalities , 2011 .

[11]  P. Cairney.  A ‘Multiple Lenses’ Approach to Policy Change: The Case of Tobacco Policy in the UK , 2007 .

[12]  J. Weiss.  The powers of problem definition: The case of government paperwork , 1989 .

[13]  Robert E. Goodin,et al.  The Public and its Policies , 2008 .

[14]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[15]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[16]  H. Bergeron,et al.  Policy Paradigms, Ideas, and Interests: The Case of the French Public Health Policy toward Drug Abuse , 2002 .

[17]  Andy Haines,et al.  Use of research to inform public policymaking , 2004, The Lancet.

[18]  Donley T. Studlar,et al.  Federalism and Multilevel Governance in Tobacco Policy: the European Union, the United Kingdom, and Devolved UK Institutions , 2009, Journal of Public Policy.

[19]  P. Hall.  Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .

[20]  N. Milio.  Glossary: healthy public policy* , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[21]  Katherine E. Smith.  Institutional Filters: The Translation and Re-circulation of Ideas about Health Inequalities Within Policy , 2013 .

[22]  C. Hay,et al.  Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism , 1998 .

[23]  Sharon Friel,et al.  Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health , 2008, The Lancet.

[24]  F. Thompson.  Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services , 1983 .

[25]  H. Graham,et al.  Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 1: The reality according to policymakers , 2004, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[26]  J. Boase.  Institutions, Institutionalized Networks and Policy Choices: Health Policy in the US and Canada , 1996 .

[27]  C. Lindblom.  Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. , 1979 .

[28]  F. R. Eisele,et al.  Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. , 1975 .

[29]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature , 1996 .

[30]  J. Shiffman,et al.  The emergence of global disease control priorities. , 2002, Health policy and planning.

[31]  Katherine E. Smith,et al.  Health inequalities in Scotland and England: the contrasting journeys of ideas from research into policy. , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[32]  Chad Raphael,et al.  Interpersonal divide: The search for community in a technological age ‐ by Michael Bugeja , 2006 .

[33]  F. Baumgartner.  EU LOBBYING: A VIEW FROM THE US , 2007 .

[34]  V. Schmidt.  Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’ , 2010, European Political Science Review.

[35]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Analysing documentary realities , 2011 .

[36]  David Wilsford,et al.  Path Dependency, or Why History Makes It Difficult but Not Impossible to Reform Health Care Systems in a Big Way , 1994, Journal of Public Policy.

[37]  Katherine E. Smith,et al.  Capturing complex realities: understanding efforts to achieve evidence-based policy and practice in public health , 2012 .

[38]  C. Lindblom.  THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[39]  Rosamond Rhodes,et al.  Policy Networks , 1990 .

[40]  J. Lomas.  The in-between world of knowledge brokering , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[41]  D. Fox,et al.  A politics of health glossary , 2007, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[42]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models , 2007 .

[43]  Katherine E. Smith.  Health inequalities in Scotland and England : the translation of ideas between research and policy , 2008 .

[44]  E. Sam Overman,et al.  Iron triangles and issue networks of information policy , 1986 .

[45]  Brian W. Hogwood,et al.  Policy Analysis For The Real World , 1984 .

[46]  D. Stone.  Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy , 2004 .

[47]  M. Marmot,et al.  Tackling health inequalities in the United Kingdom: the progress and pitfalls of policy. , 2003, Health services research.

[48]  I. Sanderson.  Complexity, 'practical rationality' and evidence-based policy making , 2006 .

[49]  Tanja A. Börzel,et al.  Organizing Babylon ‐ On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks , 1998 .

[50]  D. Yates,et al.  Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services , 1982 .

[51]  Jennifer Sass.  Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research , 2008, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[52]  D. Béland.  Ideas and Social Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective , 2005 .

[53]  E. Immergut.  The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism , 1998 .

[54]  Mark Exworthy,et al.  Policy to tackle the social determinants of health: using conceptual models to understand the policy process. , 2008, Health policy and planning.

[55]  Kathryn Sikkink,et al.  "Any More Bright Ideas?" The Ideational Turn of Comparative Political Economy@@@Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change@@@Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Argentina and Brazil , 1997 .

[56]  I. Greener,et al.  Understanding NHS reform : the policy-transfer, social learning and path dependency perspectives. , 2002 .

[57]  J. Mackenbach.  Tackling inequalities in health: the need for building a systematic evidence base , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.