Metaphoric extension, relational categories, and abstraction

ABSTRACT We propose that concepts exist along a continuum of abstraction, from highly concrete to highly abstract, and we explore a critical kind of abstract category: relational abstractions. We argue that these relational categories emerge gradually from concrete concepts through a process of progressive analogical abstraction that renders their common structure more salient. This account is supported by recent findings in historical linguistics, language acquisition and neuroscience. We suggest that analogical abstraction provides a major route for the development of abstractions in language and cognition.

[1]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Why Nouns Are Learned before Verbs: Linguistic Relativity Versus Natural Partitioning. Technical Report No. 257. , 1982 .

[2]  W. Bruce Croft Syntactic categories and grammatical relations : the cognitive organization of information , 1993 .

[3]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming , 2006, Cognition.

[4]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Language Helps Children Succeed on a Classic Analogy Task , 2014, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[6]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  The Body's Contribution to Language , 2003 .

[7]  R. Gibbs Embodiment and Cognitive Science: Concepts , 2005 .

[8]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  WHAT'S IN A WORD? ON THE CHILD'S ACQUISITION OF SEMANTICS IN HIS FIRST LANGUAGE , 1973 .

[9]  D. Gentner,et al.  Language and the career of similarity. , 1991 .

[10]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Differences in interconcept organization between nouns and verbs , 1987 .

[11]  Micah B. Goldwater,et al.  Categorizing entities by common role , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Anja Jamrozik,et al.  Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[13]  Claudia Brugman The Story of over : polysemy, semantics, and the structure of the lexicon , 1988 .

[14]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  Visual motion interferes with lexical decision on motion words , 2008, Current Biology.

[15]  S. Cappa,et al.  Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[16]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  From novel to familiar: Tuning the brain for metaphors , 2012, NeuroImage.

[17]  Nina K Simms,et al.  Analogy, higher order thinking, and education. , 2015, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[18]  Marlone D. Henderson,et al.  There Are Many Ways to See the Forest for the Trees , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[19]  William Croft,et al.  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective , 2001 .

[20]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Relational Categories are More Mutable than Entity Categories , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  L. Boroditsky Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors , 2000, Cognition.

[22]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Cognition as coordinated non-cognition , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[23]  V. Sloutsky,et al.  Are natural kinds psychologically distinct from nominal kinds? Evidence from Learning and Development , 2004 .

[24]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  The Role of Suppression and Enhancement in Understanding Metaphors. , 2001, Journal of memory and language.

[25]  D. Gentner The development of relational category knowledge , 2005 .

[26]  A. Chatterjee Disembodying cognition , 2010, Language and Cognition.

[27]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Reuniting perception and conception , 1998, Cognition.

[28]  L. Tyler,et al.  Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  D. Gentner,et al.  SOME INTERESTING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN VERBS AND NOUNS , 1981 .

[30]  D. Gentner,et al.  Where Hypotheses Come From: Learning New Relations by Structural Alignment , 2010 .

[31]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Specificity of Action Representations in the Lateral Occipitotemporal Cortex , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  S. Goldin‐Meadow The Resilience of Language : What Gesture Creation in Deaf Children Can Tell Us About How All Children Learn Language , 2005 .

[34]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  Evidence from an emerging sign language reveals that language supports spatial cognition , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Shannon M. Pruden,et al.  Children's spatial thinking: does talk about the spatial world matter? , 2011, Developmental science.

[36]  Frank Boers Spatial prepositions and metaphor: A cognitive semantic journey along the up-down and the front-back dimensions , 1996 .

[37]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  Understanding Metaphorical Comparisons: Beyond Similarity. , 1990 .

[38]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Perception of motion affects language processing , 2005, Cognition.

[39]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mutual bootstrapping between language and analogical processing , 2010, Language and Cognition.

[40]  Stavroula Kousta,et al.  Toward a theory of semantic representation , 2009, Language and Cognition.

[41]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Sensitivity to Relational Similarity and Object Similarity in Apes and Children , 2016, Current Biology.

[42]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Why do metaphors seem deeper than similes? , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[43]  Alan W. Kersten,et al.  Semantic context influences memory for verbs more than memory for nouns , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[44]  Alan W. Kersten,et al.  An examination of the distinction between nouns and verbs: Associations with two different kinds of motion , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[45]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Non-verbal thematic proto-roles. , 1993 .

[46]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Bootstrapping the Mind: Analogical Processes and Symbol Systems , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[47]  D. Gentner,et al.  Learning and Transfer: A General Role for Analogical Encoding , 2003 .

[48]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Role-governed categories , 2001, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[49]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Cross-linguistic analysis of vocabulary in young children: spanish, dutch, French, hebrew, italian, korean, and american english. , 2004, Child development.

[50]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Spatial language facilitates spatial cognition: Evidence from children who lack language input , 2013, Cognition.

[51]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  A cross-linguistic study of early lexical development , 1995 .

[52]  D. Gentner,et al.  Comparison and Categorization in the Development of Relational Similarity , 1996 .

[53]  D. Gentner,et al.  Comparison in the Development of Categories , 1999 .

[54]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Cognitive effects of language on human navigation , 2011, Cognition.

[55]  Frank H Durgin,et al.  Mixing metaphors in the cerebral hemispheres: what happens when careers collide? , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  Bernd Heine,et al.  Cognitive Foundations of Grammar , 1997 .

[57]  D. Medin,et al.  Categorization and Reasoning among Tree Experts: Do All Roads Lead to Rome? , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[58]  Micah B. Goldwater,et al.  The Linguistic Distribution of Relational Categories , 2010 .

[59]  Rachel Giora,et al.  On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language , 1999 .

[60]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  A piece of the action: Modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors , 2013, NeuroImage.

[61]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Why we’re so smart , 2003 .

[62]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  The Neural Career of Sensory-motor Metaphors , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  R. Giora Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis , 1997 .

[64]  Дедсе Сеп Alignment in the Processing of Metaphor , 2004 .

[65]  Jennifer A. Asmuth,et al.  Context Sensitivity of Relational Nouns , 2005 .

[66]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction , 2008 .

[67]  Derek C. Penn,et al.  Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[68]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[69]  D. Gentner,et al.  Language acquisition and conceptual development: Individuation, relativity, and early word learning , 2001 .

[70]  D. Gentner Language as cognitive tool kit: How language supports relational thought. , 2016, The American psychologist.

[71]  B. Heine,et al.  Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework , 1991 .

[72]  Glenn D. Blank,et al.  Metaphors in the Lexicon , 1988 .

[73]  D. Gentner,et al.  Similarity and the development of rules , 1998, Cognition.

[74]  D. Gentner,et al.  Relational language and the development of relational mapping , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[75]  Page Widick,et al.  Functional–anatomical organization of predicate metaphor processing , 2008, Brain and Language.

[76]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  The Verb Mutability Effect: Studies of the Combinatorial Semantics of Nouns and Verbs , 1990 .

[77]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Literal Bases for Metaphor and Simile , 2001 .

[78]  Helge Svare THE RELATIONAL CATEGORIES , 2006 .

[79]  Micah B. Goldwater,et al.  Relational categories as a bridge between cognitive and educational research. , 2016, Psychological bulletin.

[80]  Brian F. Bowdle,et al.  The career of metaphor. , 2005, Psychological review.

[81]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Nouns and Verbs , 1987 .

[82]  A. Markman,et al.  Categorization inside and outside the laboratory : essays in honor of Douglas L. Medin , 2005 .