Prognosis of Six-Month Glasgow Outcome Scale in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using Hospital Admission Characteristics, Injury Severity Characteristics, and Physiological Monitoring during the First Day Post-Injury.

Gold standard prognostic models for long-term outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) use admission characteristics and are considered useful in some areas but not for clinical practice. In this study, we aimed to build prognostic models for 6-month Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) in patients with severe TBI, combining baseline characteristics with physiological, treatment, and injury severity data collected during the first 24 h after injury. We used a training dataset of 472 TBI subjects and several data mining algorithms to predict the long-term neurological outcome. Performance of these algorithms was assessed in an independent (test) sample of 158 subjects. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) led to the highest prediction accuracy (area under the receiving operating characteristic curve = 0.86) in the test set. The most important post-baseline predictor of GOS was the best motor Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) recorded in the first day post-injury. The LASSO model containing the best motor GCS and baseline variables as predictors outperformed a model with baseline data only. TBI patient physiology of the first day-post-injury did not have a major contribution to patient prognosis six months after injury. In conclusion, 6-month GOS in patients with TBI can be predicted with good accuracy by the end of the first day post-injury, using hospital admission data and information on the best motor GCS achieved during those first 24 h post-injury. Passed the first day after injury, important physiological predictors could emerge from landmark analyses, leading to prediction models of higher accuracy than the one proposed in the current research.

[1]  Jose-Miguel Yamal,et al.  A joint logistic regression and covariate‐adjusted continuous‐time Markov chain model , 2017, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  Jui-Chang Tsai,et al.  Predicting Long-Term Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury Using Repeated Measurements of Glasgow Coma Scale and Data Mining Methods , 2015, Journal of Medical Systems.

[3]  Julia S. Benoit,et al.  Effect of erythropoietin and transfusion threshold on neurological recovery after traumatic brain injury: a randomized clinical trial. , 2014, JAMA.

[4]  G. Van den Berghe,et al.  Novel Methods to Predict Increased Intracranial Pressure During Intensive Care and Long-Term Neurologic Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and Validation in a Multicenter Dataset* , 2013, Critical care medicine.

[5]  T. Scalea,et al.  Dynamic three-dimensional scoring of cerebral perfusion pressure and intracranial pressure provides a brain trauma index that predicts outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  Bizhan Aarabi,et al.  Automated measurement of "pressure times time dose" of intracranial hypertension best predicts outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[8]  C.J.H. Mann,et al.  Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation and Updating , 2009 .

[9]  G. Manley,et al.  Relationship of "dose" of intracranial hypertension to outcome in severe traumatic brain injury. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  Juan Lu,et al.  Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission Characteristics , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[11]  Ewout Steyerberg,et al.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  H. Zou The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties , 2006 .

[13]  J. Pickard,et al.  Predictive value of initial computerized tomography scan, intracranial pressure, and state of autoregulation in patients with traumatic brain injury. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  Rodney X. Sturdivant,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression: Hosmer/Applied Logistic Regression , 2005 .

[15]  C. Robertson,et al.  Patterns of energy substrates during ischemia measured in the brain by microdialysis. , 2004, Journal of neurotrauma.

[16]  C. Robertson,et al.  Dynamic autoregulatory response after severe head injury. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[17]  C. Robertson,et al.  The relation between acute physiological variables and outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale following severe traumatic brain injury. , 2001, Journal of neurotrauma.

[18]  M Uzura,et al.  Prevention of secondary ischemic insults after severe head injury. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[19]  N. Stocchetti,et al.  Intracranial hypertension in head injury: management and results , 1999, Intensive Care Medicine.

[20]  C. Robertson,et al.  Relationship of brain tissue PO2 to outcome after severe head injury. , 1998, Critical care medicine.

[21]  R G Grossman,et al.  Jugular venous desaturation and outcome after head injury. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  B. Jennett,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE A Practical Scale , 1975, The Lancet.

[23]  Juan Lu,et al.  Edinburgh Research Explorer Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury , 2022 .

[24]  Konstantinos Kalpakis,et al.  Permutation entropy analysis of vital signs data for outcome prediction of patients with severe traumatic brain injury , 2015, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[25]  C. Kirkness,et al.  Intracranial pressure variability and long-term outcome following traumatic brain injury. , 2008, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[26]  C. Robertson,et al.  Significance of a reduced cerebral blood flow during the first 12 hours after traumatic brain injury , 2004, Neurocritical care.

[27]  R G Grossman,et al.  Cerebral blood flow, AVDO2, and neurologic outcome in head-injured patients. , 1992, Journal of neurotrauma.

[28]  H. Kontos,et al.  Endothelium-dependent responses after experimental brain injury. , 1992, Journal of neurotrauma.