Developing user involvement in a UK cancer network: professionals’ and users’ perspectives

This paper explores the results of a consensus development exercise that explored diverse perspectives and sought to identify key principles for the development of user involvement in a cancer network. The exercise took place within one of 34 UK cancer networks and was a collaboration between the NHS, two universities and two voluntary sector organizations. The paper explores professionals’ and users’ perspectives on user involvement with reference to the current sociopolitical context of user participation. British policy documents have placed increasing emphasis on issues of patient and public participation in the evaluation and development of health services, and the issue of lay participation represents an important aspect of a critical public health agenda. The project presented here shows that developing user involvement may be a complex task, with lack of consensus on key issues representing a significant barrier. Further, the data suggest that professional responses can partly be understood in relation to specific occupational standpoints and strategies that potentially allow professionals to define and limit users’ involvement. The implications of these findings and the impact of the consensus development process itself are discussed.

[1]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[2]  J. E. Jameson Inverse care law. , 1971, Lancet.

[3]  Kilbourn Jp Letter: Cystic fibrosis. , 1974 .

[4]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .

[5]  N. Blake The Nominal Group , 1983 .

[6]  Eugene Vayda,et al.  Inequalities in Health: The Black Report , 1988 .

[7]  D. Beevers Health, Race and Ethnicity , 1986 .

[8]  P. Beresford,et al.  User-involvement, citizenship and social policy , 1989 .

[9]  J. Evetts,et al.  Professions and Patriarchy , 1993 .

[10]  Agnes Miles,et al.  Women, health, and medicine , 1991 .

[11]  P. Townsend,et al.  Inequalities in Health: The Black Report & the Health Divide (new third edition) , 1999 .

[12]  M. Gallagher,et al.  The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice? , 1993, Family practice.

[13]  D. Hunter,et al.  Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research , 1995 .

[14]  M. Whitehouse,et al.  A policy framework for commissioning cancer services , 1995, BMJ.

[15]  P. Beresford,et al.  Whose empowerment? Equalizing the competing discourses in community care , 1995 .

[16]  C. Smaje Health, Race and Ethnicity , 1995 .

[17]  Oyin Ogunbiyi MSc BSc Mcsp Health Race and Ethnicity: Making sense of the evidence , 1996 .

[18]  Oyin Ogunbiyi,et al.  Health ‘Race’ and Ethnicity: Making sense of the evidence , 1996 .

[19]  D. Edwards Face to face : patient, family and professional perspectives of head and neck cancer care , 1997 .

[20]  S. Payne Hit and miss: the success and failure of psychiatric services for women , 1998 .

[21]  Sir Donald Acheson Independent inquiry into inequalities in health report , 1998 .

[22]  B Sibbald,et al.  Indicators of the appropriateness of long-term prescribing in general practice in the United Kingdom: consensus development, face and content validity, feasibility, and reliability. , 1998, Quality in health care : QHC.

[23]  A. S. Baker,et al.  Curriculum revision: reaching faculty consensus through the Nominal Group Technique. , 1998, The Journal of nursing education.

[24]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[25]  C. Drinkwater,et al.  Involving Patients and the Public , 1999 .

[26]  Ann McPherson,et al.  Women and Health Services: An Agenda for Change , 1999, BMJ.

[27]  J. Dixon,et al.  The NHS plan , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  Annette MacKay Rossignol,et al.  Gender Inequalities in Health , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  N. Daykin,et al.  ‘They’ll still get the bodily care’. Discourses of care and relationships between nurses and health care assistants in the NHS , 2000 .

[30]  N. Small,et al.  Too Ill to Talk?: User Involvement in Palliative Care , 2001 .

[31]  G. Levvy Too Ill to Talk? User Involvement and Palliative Care. , 2002 .

[32]  P. Smaglik Shifting the balance , 2004, Nature.

[33]  Robert C. Vipond,et al.  The virus of consumerism , 2005 .

[34]  D Acheson,et al.  Independent inquiry into inequalities in health , 2005 .