Prophet Inequalities with Limited Information

In the classical prophet inequality, a gambler observes a sequence of stochastic rewards V1, ..., Vn and must decide, for each reward Vi, whether to keep it and stop the game or to forfeit the reward forever and reveal the next value Vi. The gambler's goal is to obtain a constant fraction of the expected reward that the optimal offline algorithm would get. Recently, prophet inequalities have been generalized to settings where the gambler can choose k items, and, more generally, where he can choose any independent set in a matroid. However, all the existing algorithms require the gambler to know the distribution from which the rewards V1, ..., Vn are drawn. The assumption that the gambler knows the distribution from which V1, ..., Vn are drawn is very strong. Instead, we work with the much simpler assumption that the gambler only knows a few samples from this distribution. We construct the first single-sample prophet inequalities for many settings of interest, whose guarantees all match the best possible asymptotically, even with full knowledge of the distribution. Specifically, we provide a novel single-sample algorithm when the gambler can choose any k elements whose analysis is based on random walks with limited correlation. In addition, we provide a black-box method for converting specific types of solutions to the related secretary problem to single-sample prophet inequalities, and apply it to several existing algorithms. Finally, we provide a constant-sample prophet inequality for constant-degree bipartite matchings. In addition, we apply these results to design the first posted-price and multi-dimensional auction mechanisms with limited information in settings with asymmetric bidders. Connections between prophet inequalities and posted-price mechanisms are already known, but applying the existing framework requires knowledge of the underlying distributions, as well as the so-called "virtual values" even when the underlying prophet inequalities do not. We therefore provide an extension of this framework that bypasses virtual values altogether, allowing our mechanisms to take full advantage of the limited information required by our new prophet inequalities.

[1]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1967 .

[2]  U. Krengel,et al.  Semiamarts and finite values , 1977 .

[3]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[4]  T. Hill,et al.  Stop rule inequalities for uniformly bounded sequences of random variables , 1983 .

[5]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Truthful mechanisms for one-parameter agents , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing.

[6]  Robert D. Kleinberg A multiple-choice secretary algorithm with applications to online auctions , 2005, SODA '05.

[7]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  Matroids, secretary problems, and online mechanisms , 2007, SODA '07.

[8]  C. Greg Plaxton,et al.  Competitive Weighted Matching in Transversal Matroids , 2008, ICALP.

[9]  Martin Pál,et al.  Algorithms for Secretary Problems on Graphs and Hypergraphs , 2008, ICALP.

[10]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Simple versus optimal mechanisms , 2009, EC '09.

[11]  Shuchi Chawla,et al.  The power of randomness in bayesian optimal mechanism design , 2010, EC '10.

[12]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Revenue maximization with a single sample , 2010, EC '10.

[13]  Shuchi Chawla,et al.  Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing , 2010, BQGT.

[14]  Nikhil R. Devanur,et al.  Prior-Independent Multi-parameter Mechanism Design , 2011, WINE.

[15]  José A. Soto,et al.  Matroid secretary problem in the random assignment model , 2010, SODA '11.

[16]  Saeed Alaei,et al.  Bayesian Combinatorial Auctions: Expanding Single Buyer Mechanisms to Many Buyers , 2011, 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[17]  Jan Vondrák,et al.  On Variants of the Matroid Secretary Problem , 2011, ESA.

[18]  Nikhil R. Devanur,et al.  Near optimal online algorithms and fast approximation algorithms for resource allocation problems , 2011, EC '11.

[19]  Nikhil R. Devanur,et al.  Asymptotically optimal algorithm for stochastic adwords , 2012, EC '12.

[20]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  Matroid prophet inequalities , 2012, STOC '12.

[21]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Supply-limiting mechanisms , 2012, EC '12.

[22]  Patrick Jaillet,et al.  Advances on Matroid Secretary Problems: Free Order Model and Laminar Case , 2012, IPCO.

[23]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  Optimal and Efficient Parametric Auctions , 2013, SODA.