Adjacency Externalities and Forest Fire Prevention

This paper models landowner behavior on timberland subject to damage by fire. We examine how management decisions by adjacent landowners yield outcomes that diverge from the social optimum, and consider how this divergence depends on landowner preferences and information. We conduct a numerical simulation in which landowners interact through the effects of their fire prevention activities on a common risk of fire. The results reveal significant social inefficiencies related to externalities associated with private fuel treatment decisions. We consider a policy for aligning social and private decisions by requiring landowners to share the government’s cost of fire suppression. (JEL Q23, Q28)

[1]  James K. Brown,et al.  Managing Fire in Our Forests--Time for a New Initiative , 1989, Journal of Forestry.

[2]  Richard Hartman,et al.  THE HARVESTING DECISION WHENA STANDING FOREST HAS VALUEA , 1976 .

[3]  John V. Krutilla,et al.  Multiple use management of public forestlands , 1985 .

[4]  William F. Watson,et al.  Costs and cost trends for forestry practices in the South , 1987 .

[5]  D. V. Lear,et al.  Long-Term Studies of Prescribed Burning in Loblolly Pine Forests of the Southeastern Coastal Plain , 1987 .

[6]  M. Boscolo,et al.  Promoting Better Logging Practices in Tropical Forests , 1998 .

[7]  J. Yoder,et al.  Playing with Fire: Endogenous Risk in Resource Management , 2004 .

[8]  David R. Weise,et al.  An Evaluation of the Economic Tradeoffs of Fuel Treatment and Fire Suppression on the Angeles National Forest Using the Fire Effects Tradeoff Model 1 , 2004 .

[9]  Dr. Yulia Maleta,et al.  Playing with fire , 2009 .

[10]  S. Chang.  A simple production function model for variable density growth and yield modeling , 1984 .

[11]  M. Ollikainen,et al.  FOREST ROTATIONS AND STAND INTERDEPENDENCY: OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE AND TIMING OF DECISIONS , 2002 .

[12]  Peter C. Boxall,et al.  An Empirical Examination of Optimal Rotations in a Multiple-Use Forest in the Presence of Fire Risk , 2000 .

[13]  J. Kline,et al.  Land use changes involving forestry in the United States: 1952 to 1997, with projections to 2050. , 2003 .

[14]  Paulo M. Fernandes,et al.  A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction , 2003 .

[15]  William J. Reed,et al.  Protecting a forest against fire: optimal protection patterns and harvest policies , 1987 .

[16]  T. Waldrop.  Four Site-Preparation Techniques for Regenerating Pine-Hardwood Mixtures in the Piedmont , 1997 .

[17]  Robert G. Haight,et al.  Not Getting Burned: The Importance of Fire Prevention in Forest Management , 2005, Land Economics.

[18]  Robert G. Haight,et al.  Reducing Social Losses from Forest Fires , 2006, Land Economics.

[19]  R. Berrens,et al.  Inducing private wildfire risk mitigation: Experimental investigation of measures on adjacent public lands , 2011 .

[20]  D. R. Betters,et al.  A variational solution technique for determining optimal thinning and rotational schedules , 1984 .

[21]  William J. Reed,et al.  The effects of the risk of fire on the optimal rotation of a forest , 1984 .

[22]  R. Lipsey,et al.  The General Theory of Second Best , 1956 .

[23]  M. Lei,et al.  Hedges and Trees: Incorporating Fire Risk into Optimal Decisions in Forestry Using a No-Arbitrage Approach , 2007 .

[24]  S. Swallow,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Specialization in Forest Ecosystem Management Under Sole Ownership , 1997 .

[25]  S. Swallow,et al.  Spatial Interactions in Multiple-Use Forestry and Substitution and Wealth Effects for the Single Stand , 1993 .

[26]  Richard Hartman,et al.  The Harvesting Decision When a Standing Forest Has Value , 1976 .