A big picture: bibliometric study of academic publications from post-Soviet countries

The world’s largest community of scientists disintegrated following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. With extremely scarce resources and limited academic freedom as starting points, researchers in this region have been creating new knowledge; they have been building on rich scientific traditions in selected disciplines and, at times, paving new paths in non-traditional disciplines. At present, the cumulative contribution of post-Soviet countries to global research output is only three percent, indicating that these countries are not key players on the global research scene. This study uses bibliometric methods to offer novel empirical insight into the quantity and impact of academic publications; it also looks at the quality of journals in which the output is published. The findings reveal that fifteen post-Soviet countries differ considerably in terms of how much they have prioritised research, as well as the quantity, quality, and impact of their publications. The research productivity across the region has not been high and, taken together, these countries have produced publications of considerably lower quality and lower impact when viewed in the context of global research output. At the same time, researchers from post-Soviet countries tap into international collaborative networks actively, resulting in an exceptionally large proportion of publications from this region being internationally co-authored. In the historical context of Soviet research being known as one of the least collaborative globally, this finding indicates that researchers in the region are attractive to international collaborators and may be seeking such partnerships due to relatively modest research capacity at home.

[1]  Martin Szomszor,et al.  Interpreting CNCIs on a country-scale: The effect of domestic and international collaboration type , 2020, J. Informetrics.

[2]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Scientific publications released in the Baltic States , 2011, Scientometrics.

[3]  Creso M. Sá,et al.  Highly Cited in the South: International Collaboration and Research Recognition Among Brazil’s Highly Cited Researchers , 2020 .

[4]  R. P. Dickenson The level of research in advanced composite materials in the countries of the former Soviet Union , 2005, Scientometrics.

[5]  Jenny M. Lewis,et al.  The how and why of academic collaboration: disciplinary differences and policy implications , 2012 .

[6]  Simone Raudino,et al.  The Tyranny of Metrics , 2019, The European Legacy.

[7]  Vladimir Pislyakov,et al.  Measuring excellence in Russia: Highly cited papers, leading institutions, patterns of national and international collaboration , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Yuriy M. Brumshteyn,et al.  Russia and post-Soviet countries compared: coverage of papers by Scopus and Web of Science, languages, and productivity of researchers , 2020 .

[9]  J. Choi,et al.  On the drivers of international collaboration: The impact of informal communication, motivation, and research resources , 2014 .

[10]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators , 2004, Scientometrics.

[11]  Alexander I. Terekhov,et al.  Bibliometric spectroscopy of Russia’s nanotechnology: 2000–2014 , 2017, Scientometrics.

[12]  J. Allik,et al.  A Puzzle of Estonian Science: How to Explain Unexpected Rise of the Scientific Impact , 2018 .

[13]  M. Yudkevich,et al.  The post-Soviet publication landscape for higher education research , 2020 .

[14]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science , 2018, Scientometrics.

[15]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact , 2013, Science.

[16]  Léa Velho,et al.  The “meaning” of citation in the context of a scientifically peripheral country , 2005, Scientometrics.

[17]  E. Weinberg Sociology in the Soviet Union and Beyond: Social Enquiry and Social Change , 2004 .

[18]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations , 2004, Scientometrics.

[19]  Alexander Varshavsky,et al.  Trends in Russian research output in post-Soviet era , 2009, Scientometrics.

[20]  Mark Akoev,et al.  Russian Index of Science Citation: Overview and review , 2018, Scientometrics.

[21]  F. Collyer Global patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge: Global North, global South , 2018 .

[22]  Marek Kwiek,et al.  What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe: changing national patterns in global contexts , 2020, Studies in Higher Education.

[23]  S. Kyvik,et al.  The Exchange of Knowledge , 1997 .

[24]  Jennifer Dusdal,et al.  Science Production in Germany, France, Belgium, and Luxembourg: Comparing the Contributions of Research Universities and Institutes to Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Health , 2017, Minerva.

[25]  Dalibor Fiala,et al.  Computer science in Eastern Europe 1989-2014: a bibliometric study , 2015, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[26]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Changes in publication languages and citation practices and their effect on the scientific impact of Russian science (1993-2010) , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Vladimir Pislyakov,et al.  Citation expectations: are they realized? Study of the Matthew index for Russian papers published abroad , 2009, Scientometrics.

[28]  F. Linkov,et al.  Publication Productivity in Central Asia and Countries of the Former Soviet Union , 2016, Central Asian journal of global health.

[29]  Bekaidar Nurmashev,et al.  A Scopus-Based Analysis of Publication Activity in Kazakhstan from 2010 to 2015: Positive Trends, Concerns, and Possible Solutions , 2015, Journal of Korean medical science.

[30]  Marek Kwiek,et al.  International Research Collaboration and International Research Orientation: Comparative Findings About European Academics , 2018 .

[31]  J. Allik Quality of Estonian science estimated through bibliometric indicators (1997–2007) , 2008 .

[32]  Philip Shapira,et al.  Science system path-dependencies and their influences: nanotechnology research in Russia , 2016, Scientometrics.

[33]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science , 2019, J. Data Inf. Sci..

[34]  Jenny M. Lewis Academic Governance: Disciplines and Policy , 2013 .

[35]  Olle Persson,et al.  Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.

[36]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[37]  Edita G. Gzoyan,et al.  Comparative analysis of the scientific output of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia , 2014, Scientometrics.

[38]  Tibor Braun,et al.  International collaboration in the sciences 1981–1985 , 1990, Scientometrics.

[39]  Jüri Allik,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS OF SCIENTIFIC QUALITY , 2012 .

[40]  Stefan Skupien Searching for Macro-Meso-Micro-Level Links in Studies of North-South Research Collaborations , 2019, Minerva.

[41]  Concepción S. Wilson,et al.  Changes in the scientific output of Russia from 1980 to 2000, as reflected in the Science Citation Index, in relation to national politico-economic changes , 2004, Scientometrics.

[42]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study , 2013, Scientometrics.

[43]  I. Yegorov Post-Soviet science: Difficulties in the transformation of the R&D systems in Russia and Ukraine , 2009 .

[44]  Andrey Lovakov,et al.  Bibliometric analysis of publications from post-Soviet countries in psychological journals in 1992–2017 , 2019, Scientometrics.

[45]  M. Sales-Pardo,et al.  Effectiveness of Journal Ranking Schemes as a Tool for Locating Information , 2008, PloS one.

[46]  Weishu Liu,et al.  The changing role of non‐English papers in scholarly communication: Evidence from Web of Science's three journal citation indexes , 2017, Learn. Publ..

[47]  María Bordons,et al.  The influence of R&D intensity of countries on the impact of international collaborative research: evidence from Spain , 2014, Scientometrics.

[48]  M. Chankseliani The politics of student mobility: Links between outbound student flows and the democratic development of post-Soviet Eurasia , 2018, International Journal of Educational Development.

[49]  Alexei Kojevnikov The Great War, the Russian Civil War, and the Invention of Big Science , 2002, Science in Context.

[50]  Jonathan Adams Collaborations: The fourth age of research , 2013, Nature.

[51]  L. Graham Big Science in the Last Years of the Big Soviet Union , 1992, Osiris.

[52]  P. Seglen,et al.  Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.