Comparison of denture models by means of micro computed tomography

The production of dental inlays and crowns requires precise information on patients’ teeth morphology. The conventional method is the preparation of impressions using mold materials, e.g. a silicone impression material. The disadvantage of this technique is the human choke impulse and the flavor of the material. These discomforts can be avoided by methods where a three-dimensional scanner is used for recording the teeth morphology. The present study reveals the accuracy of three model types, namely conventional impression, rapid prototyping using an oral scanner C.O.S., 3M (Schweiz) AG and milling from a proprietary resin using the oral scanner iTero, Straumann Holding AG. For each method five models were fabricated from a steel reference (standard). Using a nanotom m (phoenixǀx-ray, GE Sensing and Inspection Technologies GmbH), three-dimensional micro computed tomography data sets of the standard and the 15 models were recorded and landmark distances within the data sets were measured with sub-pixel accuracy. To verify these results a coordinate measuring machine (Leitz PMM 864, Hexagon Metrology GmbH) based on tactile detection was used for the measurement of the landmark distances, and a correction of the distances measured by the nanotom m was arranged. The nanotom data sets of the 15 models were also compared to the standard by means of a non-rigid registration algorithm. The calculated deformation field exhibited mean pixel displacement values of (0.19 ± 0.09) mm for the C.O.S. models, (0.12 ± 0.07) mm for the gypsum models and (0.19 ± 0.12) mm for the i-Tero models.

[1]  Bert Müller,et al.  Evaluation of oral scanning in comparison to impression using three-dimensional registration , 2012, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[2]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Non-destructive three-dimensional evaluation of a polymer sponge by micro-tomography using synchrotron radiation. , 2002, Biomolecular engineering.

[3]  S Quaas,et al.  Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. , 2005, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[4]  Andreas Syrek,et al.  Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[5]  János Rohály The development of the Lava chairside oral scanner C.O.S. technology--masterstroke of a legion of talented and committed people. Interview by Laslo Faith. , 2009, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[6]  Arun K Garg Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty? , 2008, Dental implantology update.

[7]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Three-dimensional strain fields in human brain resulting from formalin fixation , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  Terry E Donovan,et al.  A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. , 2004, Dental clinics of North America.

[9]  Sears Aw,et al.  Hydrocolloid impression technique for inlays and fixed bridges. , 1970 .

[10]  A W Sears,et al.  Hydrocolloid impression technique for inlays and fixed bridges. , 1975, The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa = Die Tydskrif van die Tandheelkundige Vereniging van Suid-Afrika.

[11]  Peter Ottl,et al.  In vitro study on the dimensional accuracy of selected materials for monophase elastic impression making. , 2002, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[12]  R. Lakes,et al.  Effect of storage time on the viscoelastic properties of elastomeric impression materials. , 2012, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[13]  A. Mehl,et al.  Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study. , 2011, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[14]  Vollmer,et al.  Klinik- und Praxisführer Zahnmedizin , 2003 .

[15]  T. Bormann,et al.  Three-dimensional registration of tomography data for quantification in biomaterials science , 2012 .

[16]  Roberto Scotti,et al.  WITHDRAWN: Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. , 2011, Journal of dentistry.

[17]  P. Thurner,et al.  An optimization procedure for spatial and density resolution in hard X-ray micro-computed tomography , 2004 .

[18]  Parag R. Kachalia,et al.  Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. , 2010, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[19]  Werner H. Moörmann The evolution of the CEREC system , 2006 .

[20]  Giuseppe Varvara,et al.  Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  Daniel Jeanmonod,et al.  Strain fields in histological slices of brain tissue determined by synchrotron radiation-based micro computed tomography , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  W. Mörmann The evolution of the CEREC system. , 2006, Journal of the American Dental Association.