Spatial Bistability Generates hunchback Expression Sharpness in the Drosophila Embryo

During embryonic development, the positional information provided by concentration gradients of maternal factors directs pattern formation by providing spatially dependent cues for gene expression. In the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, a classic example of this is the sharp on–off activation of the hunchback (hb) gene at midembryo, in response to local concentrations of the smooth anterior–posterior Bicoid (Bcd) gradient. The regulatory region for hb contains multiple binding sites for the Bcd protein as well as multiple binding sites for the Hb protein. Some previous studies have suggested that Bcd is sufficient for properly sharpened Hb expression, yet other evidence suggests a need for additional regulation. We experimentally quantified the dynamics of hb gene expression in flies that were wild-type, were mutant for hb self-regulation or Bcd binding, or contained an artificial promoter construct consisting of six Bcd and two Hb sites. In addition to these experiments, we developed a reaction–diffusion model of hb transcription, with Bcd cooperative binding and hb self-regulation, and used Zero Eigenvalue Analysis to look for multiple stationary states in the reaction network. Our model reproduces the hb developmental dynamics and correctly predicts the mutant patterns. Analysis of our model indicates that the Hb sharpness can be produced by spatial bistability, in which hb self-regulation produces two stable levels of expression. In the absence of self-regulation, the bistable behavior vanishes and Hb sharpness is disrupted. Bcd cooperative binding affects the position where bistability occurs but is not itself sufficient for a sharp Hb pattern. Our results show that the control of Hb sharpness and positioning, by hb self-regulation and Bcd cooperativity, respectively, are separate processes that can be altered independently. Our model, which matches the changes in Hb position and sharpness observed in different experiments, provides a theoretical framework for understanding the data and in particular indicates that spatial bistability can play a central role in threshold-dependent reading mechanisms of positional information.

[1]  G. Struhl,et al.  RNA regulatory elements mediate control of Drosophila body pattern by the posterior morphogen nanos , 1991, Cell.

[2]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Cooperative DNA‐binding by Bicoid provides a mechanism for threshold‐dependent gene activation in the Drosophila embryo , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[3]  W. Bialek,et al.  Stability and Nuclear Dynamics of the Bicoid Morphogen Gradient , 2007, Cell.

[4]  D. Tautz,et al.  A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback , 1989, Chromosoma.

[5]  John Reinitz,et al.  Removal of background signal from in situ data on the expression of segmentation genes in Drosophila , 2005, Development Genes and Evolution.

[6]  Hsing-Ya Li,et al.  Subnetwork analysis for the determination of multiple steady states in complex reaction networks , 2000 .

[7]  T. Scarborough,et al.  The Drosophila morphogenetic protein Bicoid binds DNA cooperatively. , 1996, Development.

[8]  J. Posakony,et al.  Posterior stripe expression of hunchback is driven from two promoters by a common enhancer element. , 1995, Development.

[9]  Hsing-Ya Li Determination of Multiple Steady States in an Active Membrane Transport Model , 1999 .

[10]  D Kosman,et al.  Thoracic patterning by the Drosophila gap gene hunchback. , 2001, Developmental biology.

[11]  Ruth Lehmann,et al.  The Drosophila posterior-group gene nanos functions by repressing hunchback activity , 1989, Nature.

[12]  Qing Nie,et al.  Do morphogen gradients arise by diffusion? , 2002, Developmental cell.

[13]  F. Horn Necessary and sufficient conditions for complex balancing in chemical kinetics , 1972 .

[14]  P. Bisch,et al.  Oscillations and multiple steady states in active membrane transport models , 2004, European Biophysics Journal.

[15]  Daniel St Johnston,et al.  Seeing Is Believing The Bicoid Morphogen Gradient Matures , 2004, Cell.

[16]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Determination of anteroposterior polarity in Drosophila. , 1987, Science.

[17]  G. Struhl,et al.  Differing strategies for organizing anterior and posterior body pattern in Drosophila embryos , 1989, Nature.

[18]  S. Leibler,et al.  Establishment of developmental precision and proportions in the early Drosophila embryo , 2002, Nature.

[19]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. , 1999, Science.

[20]  W. Bialek,et al.  Probing the Limits to Positional Information , 2007, Cell.

[21]  E Seifert,et al.  Differential regulation of the two transcripts from the Drosophila gap segmentation gene hunchback. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[22]  Hamid Kellay,et al.  Bistability in non-Newtonian flow: Rheology of lyotropic liquid crystals , 1998 .

[23]  Ethel Nicholson Browne,et al.  The production of new hydranths in Hydra by the insertion of small grafts , 1909 .

[24]  W. Bialek,et al.  Diffusion and scaling during early embryonic pattern formation. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Diethard Tautz,et al.  Regulation of the Drosophila segmentation gene hunchback by two maternal morphogenetic centres , 1988, Nature.

[26]  A. Caneschi,et al.  Magnetic bistability in a metal-ion cluster , 1993, Nature.

[27]  Hsing-Ya Li Determination of multiple steady states in a family of allosteric models for glycolysis , 1998 .

[28]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos , 1988, Cell.

[29]  Wolfgang Driever,et al.  Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen , 1989, Nature.

[30]  M. Feinberg Chemical reaction network structure and the stability of complex isothermal reactors—I. The deficiency zero and deficiency one theorems , 1987 .

[31]  A. Goldbeter,et al.  A Model for Circadian Rhythms in Drosophila Incorporating the Formation of a Complex between the PER and TIM Proteins , 1998, Journal of biological rhythms.

[32]  R. Jackson,et al.  General mass action kinetics , 1972 .

[33]  Diethard Tautz,et al.  Posterior segmentation of the Drosophila embryo in the absence of a maternal posterior organizer gene , 1989, Nature.

[34]  M. Feinberg,et al.  Dynamics of open chemical systems and the algebraic structure of the underlying reaction network , 1974 .

[35]  K. Struhl,et al.  The gradient morphogen bicoid is a concentration-dependent transcriptional activator , 1989, Cell.

[36]  David M. Umulis,et al.  Robust, bistable patterning of the dorsal surface of the Drosophila embryo. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Alexander V. Spirov,et al.  Singular Spectrum Analysis of Gene Expression Profiles of Early Drosophila embryo: Exponential-in-Distance Patterns , 2008, J. Electr. Comput. Eng..

[38]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Dynamic control of positional information in the early Drosophila embryo , 2004, Nature.

[39]  E. Winfree,et al.  Construction of an in vitro bistable circuit from synthetic transcriptional switches , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[40]  Peter A. Lawrence,et al.  Control of Drosophila body pattern by the hunchback morphogen gradient , 1992, Cell.

[41]  Yu-Chiun Wang,et al.  Spatial bistability of Dpp–receptor interactions during Drosophila dorsal–ventral patterning , 2005, Nature.

[42]  Martin Feinberg,et al.  Multiple Equilibria in Complex Chemical Reaction Networks: I. the Injectivity Property * , 2006 .

[43]  D. Tautz,et al.  Differential regulation of target genes by different alleles of the segmentation gene hunchback in Drosophila. , 1994, Genetics.

[44]  N. Dostatni,et al.  Bicoid Determines Sharp and Precise Target Gene Expression in the Drosophila Embryo , 2005, Current Biology.

[45]  David M. Holloway,et al.  Making the body plan: Precision in the genetic hierarchy of Drosophila embryo segmentation , 2003, Silico Biol..

[46]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[47]  Nicholas T Ingolia,et al.  Topology and Robustness in the Drosophila Segment Polarity Network , 2004, PLoS biology.

[48]  Claude Desplan,et al.  Synergy between the hunchback and bicoid morphogens is required for anterior patterning in Drosophila , 1994, Cell.

[49]  Carlos E Vanario-Alonso,et al.  A kinetic mechanism for Drosophila bicoid cooperative binding. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[50]  Lewis Wolpert,et al.  Principles of Development , 1997 .

[51]  R. Lehmann,et al.  hunchback, a gene required for segmentation of an anterior and posterior region of the Drosophila embryo. , 1987, Developmental biology.

[52]  L. Wolpert Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[53]  John Reinitz,et al.  A database for management of gene expression data in situ , 2004, Bioinform..

[54]  Hsing-Ya Li Zero Eigenvalue Analysis for the Determination of Multiple Steady States in Reaction Networks , 1998 .

[55]  L Wolpert,et al.  Thresholds in development. , 1977, Journal of theoretical biology.

[56]  An-Chong Chao,et al.  Computational multiple steady states in enzymatically catalyzed oxidation of monophenols by tyrosinase in an isothermal CFSTR , 2004 .

[57]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila , 1980, Nature.

[58]  Keagan Moodley,et al.  A colour-map plugin for the open source, Java based, image processing package, ImageJ , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[59]  Tsonis,et al.  Wavelet analysis of DNA sequences. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[60]  A Goldbeter,et al.  Oscillations and bistability predicted by a model for a cyclical bienzymatic system involving the regulated isocitrate dehydrogenase reaction. , 2000, Biophysical chemistry.

[61]  C. Desplan,et al.  Bicoid-independent formation of thoracic segments in Drosophila. , 2000, Science.

[62]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner , 1988, Cell.

[63]  Bret J. Pearson,et al.  Drosophila Neuroblasts Sequentially Express Transcription Factors which Specify the Temporal Identity of Their Neuronal Progeny , 2001, Cell.

[64]  D Bopp,et al.  The role of localization of bicoid RNA in organizing the anterior pattern of the Drosophila embryo. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[65]  S. Hanes,et al.  Isolation of mutations that disrupt cooperative DNA binding by the Drosophila bicoid protein. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[66]  Anatoly A. Zhigljavsky,et al.  Analysis of Time Series Structure - SSA and Related Techniques , 2001, Monographs on statistics and applied probability.

[67]  Diethard Tautz,et al.  Finger protein of novel structure encoded by hunchback, a second member of the gap class of Drosophila segmentation genes , 1987, Nature.

[68]  Wolfgang Driever,et al.  The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryo , 1989, Nature.

[69]  Serge Tabachnikov,et al.  Mathematical Omnibus: Thirty Lectures on Classic Mathematics , 2007 .

[70]  Arthur D Lander,et al.  Morpheus Unbound: Reimagining the Morphogen Gradient , 2007, Cell.

[71]  Ruth Lehmann,et al.  Nanos is the localized posterior determinant in Drosophila , 1991, Cell.

[72]  Johannes Jaeger,et al.  A high-throughput method for quantifying gene expression data from early Drosophila embryos , 2005, Development Genes and Evolution.

[73]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Cross-regulatory interactions among the gap genes of Drosophila , 1986, Nature.

[74]  E. Wieschaus,et al.  Requirements for autosomal gene activity during precellular stages of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1988, Development.

[75]  A Goldbeter,et al.  Dissipative structures for an allosteric model. Application to glycolytic oscillations. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[76]  Claude Desplan,et al.  The products of the Drosophila gap genes hunchback and Krüppel bind to the hunchback promoters , 1989, Nature.

[77]  John Reinitz,et al.  Bicoid cooperative DNA binding is critical for embryonic patterning in Drosophila. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[78]  L Wolpert,et al.  Principles of Development, 2nd Edition , 2002 .

[79]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  Organization of anterior pattern in the Drosophila embryo by the maternal gene bicoid , 1986, Nature.

[80]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Dynamical modeling of syncytial mitotic cycles in Drosophila embryos , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[81]  Diethard Tautz,et al.  Regulatory and coding regions of the segmentation gene hunchback are functionally conserved between Drosophila virilis and Drosophila melanogaster , 1994, Mechanisms of Development.

[82]  David Kosman,et al.  Analysis of pattern precision shows that Drosophila segmentation develops substantial independence from gradients of maternal gene products , 2006, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.