Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources

Abstract Emergence of autonomous machines is a hotly debated topic in mass-media. However, previous research has not empirically investigated whether the perceived autonomy of robots affects their social acceptance. In this study we examined the impact of perceived robot autonomy on realistic threats (threats to human jobs, resources and safety) and identity threats (threats to human identity and distinctiveness), attitude toward robots, and support for robotics research. US based participants watched a video of robots performing various tasks – these robots were presented as either autonomous and capable of disregarding human commands or non-autonomous and only capable of following human commands. Participants who watched videos of supposedly autonomous robots perceived robots in general to be significantly more threatening to humans (both realistic and identity threats) than those who watched a video of non-autonomous robots. Furthermore, exposure to autonomous robots evoked stronger negative attitude towards robots in general and more opposition to robotics research than exposure to non-autonomous robots. Both realistic and identity threats mediated the increase in negative attitudes toward robots and opposition to robotics research, although realistic threats were often the stronger mediator of the two. Our findings have practical implications for research on AI and open new questions on the relationship between robot autonomy and their social impact.

[1]  T. Kanda,et al.  Psychology in human-robot communication: an attempt through investigation of negative attitudes and anxiety toward robots , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[2]  N. Dasgupta,et al.  The devil is in the details: abstract versus concrete construals of multiculturalism differentially impact intergroup relations. , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  N. Dasgupta,et al.  A new American dilemma? The effect of ethnic identification and public service on the national inclusion of ethnic minorities , 2012 .

[4]  David J. Calverley,et al.  Android science and animal rights, does an analogy exist? , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[5]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  The Evaluation of Empathy, Autonomy and Touch to Inform the Design of an Environmental Monitoring Robot , 2010, ICSR.

[6]  S Lewandowsky,et al.  The dynamics of trust: comparing humans to automation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[7]  Ana Guinote,et al.  Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility , 2007 .

[8]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  Defining dimensions of distinctiveness: Group variability makes a difference to differentiation , 1998 .

[9]  Carsten Zoll,et al.  The Social Role of Robots in the Future—Explorative Measurement of Hopes and Fears , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[10]  Anthony Jameson,et al.  Pros and Cons of Controllability: An Empirical Study , 2002, AH.

[11]  S. Kobasa,et al.  Stressful life events, personality, and health: an inquiry into hardiness. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  R. Baumeister,et al.  High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[13]  John P. Sullins.  When Is a Robot a Moral Agent , 2006 .

[14]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion , 2006 .

[15]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status , 2008 .

[16]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  How might people interact with agents , 1994, CACM.

[17]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Who Should I Blame? Effects of Autonomy and Transparency on Attributions in Human-Robot Interaction , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[18]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world. , 2015, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Shelley E. Taylor.  Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. , 1983 .

[20]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  The interactive effects of robot anthropomorphism and robot ability on perceived threat and support for robotics research , 2016 .

[21]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  The Nonconscious Nature of Power: Cues and Consequences , 2010 .

[22]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Autonomous vs. tele-operated: How people perceive human-robot collaboration with HRP-2 , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[23]  R. Sparrow.  Killer robots , 2019, Political Minefields.

[24]  Jaap Ham,et al.  Trust in Smart Systems , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[25]  D. Wegner,et al.  Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley , 2012, Cognition.

[26]  Melissa McKenzie,et al.  Psychological research in the internet age: The quality of web-based data , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  Generous Paupers and Stingy Princes: Power Drives Consumer Spending on Self versus Others , 2011 .

[28]  D. Campbell,et al.  Ethnocentrism: theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior , 1973 .

[29]  Walter G. Stephan,et al.  Prejudice toward immigrants. , 1999 .

[30]  D. Kelly.  The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: An Enquiry into the Functions of the Septo-Hippocampel System. By Jeffrey A. Gray Oxford University Press. 1982. Pp 548. £27.50 , 1982, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[31]  N. Epley,et al.  The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle , 2014 .

[32]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[33]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. , 2015 .

[34]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  What is a Human? - Toward Psychological Benchmarks in the Field of Human-Robot Interaction , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[35]  S. Gaertner,et al.  Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: a meta-analytic review. , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[36]  M. van vugt,et al.  Leadership, followership, and evolution: some lessons from the past. , 2008, The American psychologist.

[37]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[38]  D. Tingley,et al.  “Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents , 2015 .

[39]  Frédéric Kaplan,et al.  Who is Afraid of the Humanoid? Investigating Cultural Differences in the Acceptance of Robots , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[40]  C. Bartneck,et al.  Comparing the Similarity of Responses Received from Studies in Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to Studies Conducted Online and with Direct Recruitment , 2015, PloS one.

[41]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Lethality and Autonomous Robots: An Ethical Stance , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society.

[42]  Ben Beck,et al.  Regions of High Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Incidence and Low Bystander CPR Rates in Victoria, Australia , 2015, PloS one.

[43]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[44]  J. Gray,et al.  Précis of The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[45]  Robert Pepperell,et al.  What is a Human? , 1994, Intell. Tutoring Media.

[46]  Jaap Ham,et al.  The Dominant Robot: Threatening Robots Cause Psychological Reactance, Especially When They Have Incongruent Goals , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[47]  S. Worchel,et al.  Aggression and power restoration: The effects of identifiability and timing on aggressive behavior , 1978 .

[48]  Arjan Kuijper,et al.  Ambient Intelligence from Senior Citizens' Perspectives: Understanding Privacy Concerns, Technology Acceptance, and Expectations , 2015, AmI.

[49]  Nir Halevy,et al.  A functional model of hierarchy , 2011 .

[50]  A. Manstead,et al.  Distinctiveness threat and prototypicality : combined effects on intergroup discrimination and collective self-esteem , 1997 .

[51]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Does the Robot Have a Mind? Mind Perception and Attitudes Towards Robots Predict Use of an Eldercare Robot , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.