A reaction-diffusion model to study RNA motion by quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a powerful technique to study molecular dynamics inside living cells. During the past years, several laboratories have used FRAP to image the motion of RNA-protein and other macromolecular complexes in the nucleus and cytoplasm. In the case of mRNAs, there is growing evidence indicating that these molecules assemble into large ribonucleoprotein complexes that diffuse throughout the nucleus by Brownian motion. However, estimates of the corresponding diffusion rate yielded values that differ by up to one order of magnitude. In vivo labeling of RNA relies on indirect tagging with a fluorescent probe, and here we show how the binding affinity of the probe to the target RNA influences the effective diffusion estimates of the resulting complex. We extend current reaction-diffusion models for FRAP by allowing for diffusion of the bound complex. This more general model can be used to fit any fluorescence recovery curve involving two interacting mobile species in the cell (a fluorescent probe and its target substrate). The results show that interpreting FRAP data in light of the new model reconciles the discrepant mRNA diffusion-rate values previously reported.

[1]  M. Carmo-Fonseca,et al.  Photobleaching microscopy reveals the dynamics of mRNA-binding proteins inside live cell nuclei. , 2004, Progress in molecular and subcellular biology.

[2]  George H Patterson,et al.  Photobleaching and photoactivation: following protein dynamics in living cells. , 2003, Nature cell biology.

[3]  H. Tanke,et al.  Kinetics of HCMV immediate early mRNA expression in stably transfected fibroblasts. , 2002, Journal of cell science.

[4]  James G McNally,et al.  FRAP analysis of binding: proper and fitting. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[5]  O. Uhlenbeck,et al.  A thermodynamic analysis of the sequence-specific binding of RNA by bacteriophage MS2 coat protein. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  W. Webb,et al.  Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. , 1976, Biophysical journal.

[7]  J. McNally,et al.  The glucocorticoid receptor: rapid exchange with regulatory sites in living cells. , 2000, Science.

[8]  Robert H Singer,et al.  Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S8 References and Notes Dynamics of Single Mrnps in Nuclei of Living Cells , 2022 .

[9]  K Ribbeck,et al.  Kinetic analysis of translocation through nuclear pore complexes , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[10]  Adel Shirmohammadi,et al.  Identification of biomolecule mass transport and binding rate parameters in living cells by inverse modeling , 2006, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[11]  C. Murphy,et al.  Steady-state dynamics of Cajal body components in the Xenopus germinal vesicle , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  T. Martin,et al.  Nuclear Transport of Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)-Related Protein Is Dependent on Microtubules , 2002 .

[13]  Maria Carmo-Fonseca,et al.  Intracellular macromolecular mobility measured by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching with confocal laser scanning microscopes. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[14]  T Misteli,et al.  Protein dynamics: implications for nuclear architecture and gene expression. , 2001, Science.

[15]  Hiroshi Kimura,et al.  The transcription cycle of RNA polymerase II in living cells , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  H. Kuthan Temporal fluctuation of nuclear pore complex localization by single diffusing mRNP complexes. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  Wedekind,et al.  Three‐dimensional diffusion measurements by scanning microphotolysis , 1998 .

[18]  D. E. Wolf,et al.  Intranuclear diffusion and hybridization state of oligonucleotides measured by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy in living cells. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  R. Singer,et al.  Movement of nuclear poly(A) RNA throughout the interchromatin space in living cells , 1999, Current Biology.

[20]  R. Peters,et al.  Molecular mobility and nucleocytoplasmic flux in hepatoma cells , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  T. Misteli,et al.  High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus , 2000, Nature.

[22]  K. Braeckmans,et al.  Anomalous photobleaching in fluorescence recovery after photobleaching measurements due to excitation saturation--a case study for fluorescein. , 2006, Journal of biomedical optics.

[23]  M. Carmo-Fonseca,et al.  In vivo aggregation properties of the nuclear poly(A)-binding protein PABPN1. , 2005, RNA.

[24]  F. Boisvert,et al.  The Transcription Coactivator Cbp Is a Dynamic Component of the Promyelocytic Leukemia Nuclear Body , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  Elmar Wahle,et al.  The intranuclear mobility of messenger RNA binding proteins is ATP dependent and temperature sensitive , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  Michael Bustin,et al.  Dynamic interaction of HMGA1a proteins with chromatin , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[27]  U. Kubitscheck,et al.  Scanning microphotolysis: three-dimensional diffusion measurement and optical single-transporter recording. , 1999, Methods.

[28]  Juan Valcárcel,et al.  The expanding transcriptome: the genome as the ‘Book of Sand’ , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[29]  A. Lustig,et al.  Mammalian poly(A)-binding protein II. Physical properties and binding to polynucleotides. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[30]  Florian Müller,et al.  Analysis of binding at a single spatially localized cluster of binding sites by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[31]  Xavier Darzacq,et al.  Imaging gene expression in single living cells , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[32]  Jan Ellenberg,et al.  Dissecting the contribution of diffusion and interactions to the mobility of nuclear proteins. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Y. Hiraoka,et al.  Dynamic interaction between BAF and emerin revealed by FRAP, FLIP, and FRET analyses in living HeLa cells. , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[34]  H. Tanke,et al.  Poly(A)+ RNAs roam the cell nucleus and pass through speckle domains in transcriptionally active and inactive cells , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[35]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Kinetic modelling approaches to in vivo imaging , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[36]  Sanjay Tyagi,et al.  Mechanism of mRNA transport in the nucleus. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Peter Hinow,et al.  The DNA binding activity of p53 displays reaction-diffusion kinetics. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[38]  D. Clapham,et al.  Real-time imaging of nuclear permeation by EGFP in single intact cells. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[39]  A. Lamond,et al.  Dynamic targeting of protein phosphatase 1 within the nuclei of living mammalian cells. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[40]  John Crank,et al.  The Mathematics Of Diffusion , 1956 .

[41]  M. Carmo-Fonseca,et al.  Dynamic association of RNA-editing enzymes with the nucleolus , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[42]  R. Pego,et al.  Analysis of binding reactions by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[43]  D. Ingber,et al.  A mathematical model to determine molecular kinetic rate constants under non-steady state conditions using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). , 2006, Biophysical chemistry.