Towards a Sociological Understanding of Robots as Companions

While Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) have, in the past, primarily mediated or facilitated emotional bonding between humans, contemporary robot technologies are increasingly making the bond between human and robots the core issue. Thinking of robots as companions is not only a development that opens up huge potential for new applications, it also raises social and ethical issues. In this paper we will argue that current conceptions of human-robot companionship are primarily rooted in cognitive psychological traditions and provide important, yet limited understanding of the companion relationship. Elaborating on a sociological perspective on the appropriation of new technology, we will argue for a richer understanding of companionship that takes the situatedness (in location, network and time) of the use-context into account.

[1]  C. Bullard.  Shaping technology/Building society , 1994 .

[2]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[3]  S. Turkle.  Authenticity in the age of digital companions , 2007 .

[4]  Nelly E.J. Oudshoorn,et al.  Diversity and Distributed Agency in the Design and Use ofMedical Video-Communication Technologies , 2005 .

[5]  Cory D. Kidd,et al.  Relational artifacts with children and elders: the complexities of cybercompanionship , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[6]  Y. Wilks,et al.  Book Review: Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical, and Design Issues edited by Yorick Wilks , 2010, CL.

[7]  Glenda Shaw-Garlock,et al.  Looking Forward to Sociable Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[8]  Ruth Aylett,et al.  A Socially-Aware Memory for Companion Agents , 2009, IVA.

[9]  Yorick Wilks.  Artificial Companions , 2004, MLMI.

[10]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  Evocative objects : things we think with , 2007 .

[11]  Sandra Pedrosa,et al.  Little Mozart: Establishing Long Term Relationships with (Virtual) Companions , 2009, IVA.

[12]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[13]  Shanyang Zhao,et al.  Humanoid social robots as a medium of communication , 2006, New Media Soc..

[14]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  Towards a conceptual and methodological framework for determining robot believability , 2010 .

[15]  S. Woolgar.  Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials , 1990 .

[16]  R. Sparrow.  The March of the robot dogs , 2002, Ethics and Information Technology.

[17]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  How robotic products become social products: An ethnographic study of cleaning in the home , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[18]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen , 1995 .

[19]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  The Product Ecology: Understanding Social Product Use and Supporting Design Culture , 2008 .

[20]  Carlos Martinho,et al.  Designing a game companion for long-term social interaction , 2009, AFFINE '09.

[21]  L. Suchman.  Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[22]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[23]  B. Latour.  On Recalling Ant , 1999 .

[24]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[25]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[26]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[27]  Prasad Boradkar.  Designing Things: A Critical Introduction to the Culture of Objects , 2010 .