Does the load-sharing classification predict ligamentous injury, neurological injury, and the need for surgery in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures?: Clinical article.

OBJECT The load-sharing score (LSS) of vertebral body comminution is predictive of results after short-segment posterior instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Some authors have posited that an LSS > 6 is predictive of neurological injury, ligamentous injury, and the need for surgical intervention. However, the authors of the present study hypothesized that the LSS does not predict ligamentous or neurological injury. METHODS The prospectively collected spinal cord injury database from a single institution was queried for thoracolumbar burst fractures. Study inclusion criteria were acute (< 24 hours) burst fractures between T-10 and L-2 with preoperative CT and MRI. Flexion-distraction injuries and pathological fractures were excluded. Four experienced spine surgeons determined the LSS and posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) integrity. Neurological status was assessed from a review of the medical records. RESULTS Forty-four patients were included in the study. There were 4 patients for whom all observers assigned an LSS > 6, recommending operative treatment. Eleven patients had LSSs ≤ 6 across all observers, suggesting that nonoperative treatment would be appropriate. There was moderate interobserver agreement (0.43) for the overall LSS and fair agreement (0.24) for an LSS > 6. Correlations between the LSS and the PLC score averaged 0.18 across all observers (range -0.02 to 0.34, p value range 0.02-0.89). Correlations between the LSS and the American Spinal Injury Association motor score averaged -0.12 across all observers (range -0.25 to -0.03, p value range 0.1-0.87). Correlations describing the relationship between an LSS > 6 and the treating physician's decision to operate averaged 0.17 across all observers (range 0.11-0.24, p value range 0.12-0.47). CONCLUSIONS The LSS does not uniformly correlate with the PLC injury, neurological status, or empirical clinical decision making. The LSSs of only one observer correlated significantly with PLC injury. There were no significant correlations between the LSS as determined by any observer and neurological status or clinical decision making.

[1]  R. Hurlbert,et al.  Classification and Surgical Decision Making in Acute Subaxial Cervical Spine Trauma , 2010, Spine.

[2]  C. Fisher,et al.  Using magnetic resonance imaging to accurately assess injury to the posterior ligamentous complex of the spine: a prospective comparison of the surgeon and radiologist. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[3]  P. Katonis,et al.  Combination of the AO-Magerl and load-sharing classifications for the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. , 2010, Orthopedics.

[4]  Alpesh A. Patel,et al.  Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma Classification , 2010, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[5]  Xiang-Yang Wang,et al.  Assessment of ligamentous injury in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures using MRI. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  D. Brodke,et al.  Thoracolumbar spine trauma classification: the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score system and case examples. , 2009, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[7]  L. Dai,et al.  Conservative Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Long-term Follow-up Results With Special Reference to the Load Sharing Classification , 2008, Spine.

[8]  Xiang-Yang Wang,et al.  Kyphosis recurrence after posterior short-segment fixation in thoracolumbar burst fractures. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[9]  R. Hurlbert,et al.  A review of the TLICS system: a novel, user-friendly thoracolumbar trauma classification system , 2008, Acta orthopaedica.

[10]  D. Brodke,et al.  Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems , 2007, Indian Journal of Orthopaedics.

[11]  Xiang-Yang Wang,et al.  The Load-Sharing Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures: An In Vitro Biomechanical Validation , 2007, Spine.

[12]  B. Aarabi,et al.  The Influence of Fracture Mechanism and Morphology on the Reliability and Validity of Two Novel Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Systems , 2007, Spine.

[13]  Xiang-Yang Wang,et al.  A review of the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. , 2007, Surgical neurology.

[14]  Alpesh A. Patel,et al.  The Adoption of a New Classification System: Time-Dependent Variation in Interobserver Reliability of the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score Classification System , 2007, Spine.

[15]  A. Y. Tabak,et al.  Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar junction burst fractures with short- or long-segment posterior fixation in magerl type a fractures , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[16]  R. Hurlbert,et al.  Validating a Newly Proposed Classification System for Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Looking to the Future of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[17]  Moe R. Lim,et al.  Surgical Decision Making for Unstable Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries: Results of a Consensus Panel Review by the Spine Trauma Study Group , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[18]  Moe R. Lim,et al.  Thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score: a new paradigm for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine trauma , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[19]  R. Hurlbert,et al.  A New Classification of Thoracolumbar Injuries: The Importance of Injury Morphology, the Integrity of the Posterior Ligamentous Complex, and Neurologic Status , 2005, Spine.

[20]  Mitchel B Harris,et al.  Assessment of two thoracolumbar fracture classification systems as used by multiple surgeons. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  L. Dai,et al.  Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability in the Load Sharing Classification of the Assessment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures , 2005, Spine.

[22]  R. Marino,et al.  Metric properties of the ASIA motor score: subscales improve correlation with functional activities. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  A. Minami,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting posterior ligamentous complex injury associated with thoracic and lumbar fractures. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[24]  P. Papagelopoulos,et al.  Gertzbein and Load Sharing Classifications for Unstable Thoracolumbar Fractures , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  P. Katonis,et al.  Functional outcome of burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine managed non-operatively, with early ambulation, evaluated using the load sharing classification. , 2002, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[26]  A J Verbout,et al.  Some Complications of Common Treatment Schemes of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures Can Be Predicted With Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prospective Study of 53 Patients With 71 Fractures , 2002, Spine.

[27]  R. Gaines,et al.  Successful short-segment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fractures: a consecutive 41/2-year series. , 2000, Spine.

[28]  V. Dietz,et al.  Analyses of 94 consecutive spinal cord injury patients using ASIA definition and modified Frankel score classification , 1994, Paraplegia.

[29]  R. Gaines,et al.  The Load Sharing Classification of Spine Fractures , 1994, Spine.

[30]  K. Wenger,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of the Stability of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures , 1994, Spine.

[31]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[32]  P. Huddleston Posterior Short-Segment Fixation with or without Fusion for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Five to Seven-Year Prospective Randomized Study , 2010 .