Investigation of Additively Manufactured Wind Tunnel Models with Integrated Pressure Taps for Vortex Flow Analysis

Wind tunnel models are traditionally machined from high-quality metal material; this condition reduces the possibility to test different geometric variations or models as it corresponds to incremental cost. In the last decade, the quality of additive manufacturing techniques has been progressively increasing, while the cost has been decreasing. The utilization of 3D-printing techniques suggests the possibility to improve the cost, time, and flexibility of a wind tunnel model production. Possible disadvantages in terms of quality of the model finishing, stiffness, and geometric accuracy are investigated, to understand if the production technique is capable of providing a suitable test device. Additionally, pressure taps for steady surface pressure measurements are integrated during the printing procedure and the production of complex three-dimensional highly swept wings have been selected as targets. Computational fluid dynamics tools are exploited to confirm the experimental results in accordance with the best practice approaches characterizing flow patterns dominated by leading-edge vortices. The fidelity level of the experimental data for scientific research of the described flow fields is investigated. An insight of the most important guidelines and the possible improvements is provided as well as the main features of the approach.

[1]  Christian Breitsamter,et al.  Unsteady flow phenomena associated with leading-edge vortices , 2008 .

[2]  Philip Dickens,et al.  Implications on design of rapid manufacturing , 2003 .

[3]  Christian Breitsamter,et al.  AVT-183 diamond wing flow field characteristics Part 1: Varying leading-edge roughness and the effects on flow separation onset , 2016 .

[4]  Christian Breitsamter,et al.  Leading-Edge Roughness Effects on the Flow Separation Onset of the AVT-183 Diamond Wing Configuration (Invited) , 2015 .

[5]  F. Knoth,et al.  Leading-Edge Roughness Affecting Diamond-Wing Aerodynamic Characteristics , 2018, Aerospace.

[6]  J. Edwards,et al.  Comparison of eddy viscosity-transport turbulence models for three-dimensional, shock-separated flowfields , 1996 .

[7]  Andreas Kirchheim,et al.  Why Education and Training in the Field of Additive Manufacturing is a Necessity , 2017 .

[8]  Vincent Thomson,et al.  A comparison of rapid prototyping techniques used for wind tunnel model fabrication , 1998 .

[9]  Y. Shmyglevskii,et al.  On “vortex breakdown” , 1995 .

[10]  Cyrus Aghanajafi,et al.  Integration of Three-Dimensional Printing Technology for Wind-Tunnel Model Fabrication , 2010 .

[11]  A. Springer Evaluating Aerodynamic Characteristics of Wind-Tunnel Models Produced by Rapid Prototyping Methods , 1998 .

[12]  Cyrus Aghanajafi,et al.  Influence of Layer Thickness on the Design of Rapid-Prototyped Models , 2009 .

[13]  P. Spalart,et al.  Turbulence Modeling in Rotating and Curved Channels: Assessing the Spalart-Shur Correction , 2000 .

[14]  W. H. Wentz,et al.  Wind tunnel investigations of vortex breakdown on slender sharp edged wings Final report , 1968 .

[15]  T. Gerhold,et al.  Technical Documentation of the DLR T-Code , 1997 .

[16]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[17]  Andreas Hövelmann,et al.  Analysis and Control of Partly-Developed Leading-Edge Vortices , 2016 .

[18]  Charles Tyler,et al.  Development of a Low Cost, Rapid Prototype, Lambda Wing-Body Wind Tunnel Model , 2003 .

[19]  Patrick Pradel,et al.  Complexity is not for free: the impact of component complexity on additive manufacturing build time , 2017 .