Description-text related soft information in peer-to-peer lending – Evidence from two leading European platforms

We examine the relation of soft factors that are derived from the description texts to the probability of successful funding and to the default probability in peer-to-peer lending for two leading European platforms. We find that spelling errors, text length and the mentioning of positive emotion evoking keywords predict the funding probability on the less restrictive of both platforms, which even accepts applications without credit scores. This platform also shows a better risk-return profile. Conditional on being funded, text-related factors hardly predict default probabilities in peer-to-peer lending for both platforms.

[1]  Jessica Ryan,et al.  Fighting for Funds: An Exploratory Study into the Field of Crowdfunding , 2011 .

[2]  Minae Park.  SPELLING AND GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN ELECTRONIC MEETINGS , 2010 .

[3]  Gregor N. F. Weiß,et al.  Mitigating Adverse Selection in P2P Lending – Empirical Evidence from Prosper.com , 2010 .

[4]  Axel Wieandt,et al.  The Future of Peer-to-Peer Finance , 2012 .

[5]  Douglas W. Diamond.  Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring , 1984 .

[6]  Jeremy Michels.  Do Unverifiable Disclosures Matter? Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Lending , 2012 .

[7]  Gary S. Becker,et al.  The Economics of Discrimination. , 1972 .

[8]  Lance A. Young,et al.  Trust and Credit: The Role of Appearance in Peer-to-peer Lending , 2012 .

[9]  Bill McDonald,et al.  Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures , 2013 .

[10]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Crowdfunding , 2013, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[11]  B. Lucey,et al.  The Role of Feelings in Investor Decision-Making , 2004 .

[12]  Craig R. Everett.  Group Membership, Relationship Banking and Loan Default Risk: The Case of Online Social Lending , 2015 .

[13]  Rajkamal Iyer,et al.  Screening Peers Softly: Inferring the Quality of Small Borrowers , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Jesse H. Jones.  How Accounts Shape Lending Decisions through Fostering Perceived Trustworthiness , 2011 .

[15]  Peter E. Kennedy.  A Guide to Econometrics , 1979 .

[16]  Rainer Böhme,et al.  Collective Exposure: Peer Effects in Voluntary Disclosure of Personal Data , 2011, Financial Cryptography.

[17]  L. Renneboog,et al.  Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior , 2008 .

[18]  Ning Chen,et al.  Auctions for social lending: A theoretical analysis , 2014, Games Econ. Behav..

[19]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  J. Hemer.  A snapshot on crowdfunding , 2011 .

[21]  Rainer Böhme,et al.  Social Lending aus der Perspektive des Datenschutzes , 2010, Sicherheit.

[22]  Yuliya Komarova Loureiro,et al.  When can a photo increase credit? The impact of lender and borrower profiles on online peer-to-peer loans , 2014 .

[23]  Nitin Bhatt,et al.  Determinants of Repayment in Microcredit: Evidence from Programs in the United States , 2002 .

[24]  D. Hirshleifer.  Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing , 2001 .

[25]  C. Fershtman,et al.  Trust and discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach , 2001 .

[26]  U. Dholakia,et al.  Tell Me a Good Story and I May Lend you Money: The Role of Narratives in Peer-to-Peer Lending Decisions , 2011 .

[27]  R. Lucas.  Expectations and the neutrality of money , 1972 .

[28]  D. Rivers,et al.  Limited Information Estimators and Exogeneity Tests for Simultaneous Probit Models , 1988 .

[29]  A. Kennedy,et al.  The influence of parafoveal typographical errors on eye movements in reading , 2004 .

[30]  G. Bruton,et al.  New Financial Alternatives in Seeding Entrepreneurship: Microfinance, Crowdfunding, and Peer–to–Peer Innovations , 2015 .

[31]  Byungtae Lee,et al.  Herding behavior in online P2P lending: An empirical investigation , 2012, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[32]  S. C. Berger,et al.  Emergence of Financial Intermediaries in Electronic Markets: The Case of Online P2P Lending , 2009 .

[33]  Tim Loughran,et al.  Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures: Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures , 2014 .

[34]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Microeconometrics Using Stata , 2009 .

[35]  D. Kreiner,et al.  Effects of Spelling Errors on the Perception of Writers , 2002, The Journal of general psychology.

[36]  Siva Viswanathan,et al.  Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[37]  Cristina Rossi Lamastra,et al.  Crowdfunding: The New Frontier for Financing Entrepreneurship? , 2012 .

[38]  B. Lucey,et al.  The Role of Feelings in Investor Decision-Making , 2004 .

[39]  Mingfeng Lin,et al.  Auction vs. Posted-Price: Market Mechanism, Lender Behaviors, and Transaction Outcomes in Online Crowdfunding , 2013 .

[40]  G. Jin,et al.  Do Social Networks Solve Information Problems for Peer-to-Peer Lending? Evidence from Prosper.Com , 2008 .

[41]  Qiang Gao,et al.  Linguistic Features and Peer-to-Peer Loan Quality: A Machine Learning Approach , 2014 .

[42]  Devin G. Pope,et al.  What’s in a Picture? , 2011, The Journal of Human Resources.

[43]  Jacob Solomon,et al.  Coordinating donors on crowdfunding websites , 2014, CSCW.

[44]  L. Figueredo,et al.  Didn't You Run the Spell Checker? Effects of Type of Spelling Error and Use of a Spell Checker on Perceptions of the Author , 2005 .

[45]  Enrichetta Ravina.  Love & Loans: The Effect of Beauty and Personal Characteristics in Credit Markets , 2012 .

[46]  Nataliya Barasinska,et al.  Is Crowdfunding Different? Evidence on the Relation between Gender and Funding Success from a German Peer-to-Peer Lending Platform , 2014 .

[47]  E. Gerber,et al.  Crowdfunding : Why People Are Motivated to Post and Fund Projects on Crowdfunding Platforms , 2011 .

[48]  J. Short,et al.  The effect of entrepreneurial rhetoric on microlending investment: : An examination of the warm-glow effect , 2013 .