Children's choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology

This study examines children's choice of drawing to communicate their understanding of the concept “technology”. The study explored whether the children's drawings accurately reflected the depth and range of their understanding of technology in a way that was interpretable by others. Data were collected from 314 primary school children in England and 745 children in Western Australia. Children were invited to demonstrate their knowledge and understanding about technology by responding to a writing/drawing activity and a representative subsample were then interviewed about their responses. About two-thirds of children's responses to the activity included drawings. Children held a wide range of ideas about technology and only rarely was a drawing difficult to interpret. Although overall the drawings reflected the range of children's ideas, sometimes they did not reveal the depth or breadth of an individual child's understanding. Consistent with the ideas represented in the drawings, the interviews found that younger children held simpler ideas about technology, while older children held more complex, and sometimes quite abstract concepts of technology. A notable difference between the two countries was the emphasis on “design and make” and a smaller proportion of no response in the English sample, reflecting the greater length of time technology education has been implemented in England compared to Western Australia.

[1]  D. Symington,et al.  The satisfaction of young children with their representational drawings of natural phenomena , 1984 .

[2]  M. Krampen Children's Drawings: Iconic Coding of the Environment , 1991 .

[3]  L. Rennie,et al.  Understanding technology: the development of a concept , 1996 .

[4]  D. Layton Technology's challenge to science education , 1993 .

[5]  Ruth Straus Gainer,et al.  Scientific Illustration for the Elementary School. , 1986 .

[6]  L. Rennie,et al.  Three approaches to measuring children's perceptions about technology , 1995 .

[7]  Paul L. Gardner,et al.  The technology-science relationship: Some curriculum implications , 1990 .

[8]  D. Symington,et al.  Children's drawings of natural phenomena , 1981 .

[9]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  English and Australian Children's Perceptions about Technology , 1995 .

[10]  J. K. Gilbert,et al.  A Method for Investigating Concept Understanding in Science , 1980 .

[11]  P. Light,et al.  SYMBOLISM AND INTELLECTUAL REALISM IN CHILDREN'S DRAWINGS , 1976 .

[12]  M. Krampen Children's Drawings: Iconic Coding of the Environment , 1991 .

[13]  Dale B. Harris,et al.  Children's Drawings as Measures of Intellectual Maturity , 1965 .

[14]  David Symington,et al.  Drawing during science activity in the primary school , 1994 .

[15]  Jh Jan Raat,et al.  Technology in education: Research and development in the project ‘Physics and Technology’ , 1987 .

[16]  Kay Melzi,et al.  Art in the Primary School , 1967 .

[17]  Rod Taylor,et al.  The Arts in the Primary School , 1993 .

[18]  Paul L. Gardner,et al.  The relationship between technology and science: Some historical and philosophical reflections. Part I , 1994 .

[19]  Hugh Munby,et al.  Science, Stories, and Sense-Making: A Comparison of Qualitative Data from a Wetlands Unit. , 1994 .

[20]  M. Cox,et al.  Children's Drawings of the Human Figure , 1993 .